Literature DB >> 23039461

Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.

Inge Brons1, Rolph Houben, Wouter A Dreschler.   

Abstract

Time-frequency masking is a method for noise reduction that is based on the time-frequency representation of a speech in noise signal. Depending on the estimated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), each time-frequency unit is either attenuated or not. A special type of a time-frequency mask is the ideal binary mask (IBM), which has access to the real SNR (ideal). The IBM either retains or removes each time-frequency unit (binary mask). The IBM provides large improvements in speech intelligibility and is a valuable tool for investigating how different factors influence intelligibility. This study extends the standard outcome measure (speech intelligibility) with additional perceptual measures relevant for noise reduction: listening effort, noise annoyance, speech naturalness, and overall preference. Four types of time-frequency masking were evaluated: the original IBM, a tempered version of the IBM (called ITM) which applies limited and non-binary attenuation, and non-ideal masking (also tempered) with two different types of noise-estimation algorithms. The results from ideal masking imply that there is a trade-off between intelligibility and sound quality, which depends on the attenuation strength. Additionally, the results for non-ideal masking suggest that subjective measures can show effects of noise reduction even if noise reduction does not lead to differences in intelligibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039461     DOI: 10.1121/1.4747006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  An ideal quantized mask to increase intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Jordan L Vasko
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.

Authors:  Kathryn Arehart; Pamela Souza; James Kates; Thomas Lunner; Michael Syskind Pedersen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Inge Brons; Rolph Houben; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.

Authors:  Elke M J Devocht; A Miranda L Janssen; Josef Chalupper; Robert J Stokroos; Erwin L J George
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Maj van den Tillaart-Haverkate; Inge de Ronde-Brons; Wouter A Dreschler; Rolph Houben
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Federico Bolner; Jessica J M Monaghan; Bas van Dijk; Andrzej Zarowski; Stefan Bleeck
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Efficacy of a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Function.

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Yuan Chen; Qianran Wang; Volker Kuehnel
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Listening to Music Through Hearing Aids: Potential Lessons for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

9.  The benefit of combining a deep neural network architecture with ideal ratio mask estimation in computational speech segregation to improve speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Thomas Bentsen; Tobias May; Abigail A Kressner; Torsten Dau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.