Literature DB >> 23037494

Evolution of axillary nodal staging in breast cancer: clinical implications of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial.

Miraj Shah-Khan1, Judy C Boughey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of the axilla in breast cancer patients has evolved from routine axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for all patients to a highly selective approach based on the assessment of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) as well as tumor and patient characteristics. Although ALND continues to have an important role in staging and regional control for many breast cancer patients, recent trial results question the need for routine ALND in patients who have positive SLNs.
METHODS: Not all axillary disease becomes clinically detectable or relevant with respect to recurrence and survival. Therefore, recent trends indicate that many surgeons have omitted ALND in subgroups of patients, particularly those with clinically node-negative, SLN-positive, early-stage breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving therapy with postoperative irradiation. This review explores trends in axillary management, focusing primarily on the clinical implications of the results from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 randomized controlled trial.
RESULTS: According to the results of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, the use of SLN dissection alone did not result in inferior survival compared with ALND in patients with limited SLN disease treated with breast-conserving therapy. This subgroup of women was spared the morbidity associated with ALND. However, several points of debate, including the smaller than anticipated sample size, the older study population, and the length of follow-up, suggest caution when applying these findings to all women with breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings of ACOSOG Z0011 are impressive, in clinical practice they are applicable to a limited number of women with breast cancer: those with T1-2 primary tumors with clinically negative axilla and 1 to 2 positive SLNs undergoing breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant whole-breast irradiation. The next generation of clinical trials may answer some of the remaining questions regarding how best to manage the axilla in additional subsets of patients undergoing treatment of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23037494     DOI: 10.1177/107327481201900403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Control        ISSN: 1073-2748            Impact factor:   3.302


  19 in total

1.  Axillary lymph node management in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Ioannis A Voutsadakis; Silvana Spadafora
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10

2.  Non-sentinel axillary tumor burden applying the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria to a large routine cohort.

Authors:  Fabian Riedel; Jörg Heil; Manuel Feißt; Mahdi Rezai; Mareike Moderow; Christof Sohn; Florian Schütz; Michael Golatta; André Hennigs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Breast cancer and sentinel lymph node micrometastases: indications for lymphadenectomy and literature review.

Authors:  G Zanghì; G Di Stefano; A Caponnetto; R Vecchio; A Lanaia; A La Terra; V Leanza; F Basile
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

4.  Upper limb lymphedema in breast cancer patients in the era of Z0011, sentinel lymph node biopsy and breast conservation.

Authors:  N R Bhatt; M R Boland; R McGovern; A Lal; S Tormey; A J Lowery; B A Merrigan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Comparative Age-Based Prospective Multi-Institutional Observations of 12,367 Patients Enrolled to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z901101 Trials (Alliance).

Authors:  Waddah B Al-Refaie; Paul A Decker; Karla V Ballman; Peter W T Pisters; Mitchell C Posner; Kelly K Hunt; Bryan Meyers; Armin D Weinberg; Heidi Nelson; Lisa Newman; Angelina Tan; Jennifer G Le-Rademacher; Arti Hurria; Aminah Jatoi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Evaluation of the Probability of Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis using Two Different Methods.

Authors:  İrfan Başoğlu; Muhammet Ferhat Çelik; Ahmet Cem Dural; Mustafa Gökhan Ünsal; Cevher Akarsu; Halil Fırat Baytekin; Selin Kapan; Halil Alış
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-10-01

7.  Is Preoperative Axillary Imaging Beneficial in Identifying Clinically Node-Negative Patients Requiring Axillary Lymph Node Dissection?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Maxine Jochelson; Jessica C Gooch; Sujata Patil; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: improvements in breast cancer quality indicators during a 3-year interval.

Authors:  Christine Laronga; Jhanelle E Gray; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; William J Fulp; Michelle Fletcher; Fred Schreiber; Richard Brown; Richard Levine; Thomas Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Phillip Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; David Shibata; Mokenge Malafa; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  A support vector machine model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in patients with sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaowen Ding; Shangnao Xie; Jie Chen; Wenju Mo; Hongjian Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-02-10

10.  Impact of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z11 on surgical training at an academic cancer center.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Jessica Young; Helen Cappuccino; Shicha Kumar
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.