BACKGROUND: Brain white matter (WM) abnormalities have been hypothesized to play an important role in the neurobiology of bipolar disorder (BD). The nature of these abnormalities is not well-characterized, however, and it is unknown whether they occur after disease onset or represent potential markers of genetic risk. METHODS: We examined WM integrity (assessed via fractional anisotropy [FA]) with diffusion tensor imaging in patients with BD (n=26), unaffected siblings of patients with BD (n=15), and healthy volunteers (n=27) to identify WM biomarkers of genetic risk. RESULTS: The FA differed significantly (p<.05; corrected) among the three groups within the right temporal WM. Unaffected siblings had FA values that were intermediate to and significantly different from those of healthy volunteers and patients with BD (healthy control subjects>unaffected siblings>BD). Moreover, FA values in this region correlated negatively and significantly with trait impulsivity in unaffected siblings. Probabilistic tractography indicated that the regional abnormality lies along the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, a large intrahemispheric association pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that lower WM integrity in the right temporal lobe might be a biomarker for genetic risk of BD. It is conceivable that the attenuated nature of these WM abnormalities present in unaffected siblings allows for some preservation of adaptive emotional regulation, whereas more pronounced alterations observed in patients is related to the marked emotional dysregulation characteristic of BD.
BACKGROUND:Brain white matter (WM) abnormalities have been hypothesized to play an important role in the neurobiology of bipolar disorder (BD). The nature of these abnormalities is not well-characterized, however, and it is unknown whether they occur after disease onset or represent potential markers of genetic risk. METHODS: We examined WM integrity (assessed via fractional anisotropy [FA]) with diffusion tensor imaging in patients with BD (n=26), unaffected siblings of patients with BD (n=15), and healthy volunteers (n=27) to identify WM biomarkers of genetic risk. RESULTS: The FA differed significantly (p<.05; corrected) among the three groups within the right temporal WM. Unaffected siblings had FA values that were intermediate to and significantly different from those of healthy volunteers and patients with BD (healthy control subjects>unaffected siblings>BD). Moreover, FA values in this region correlated negatively and significantly with trait impulsivity in unaffected siblings. Probabilistic tractography indicated that the regional abnormality lies along the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, a large intrahemispheric association pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that lower WM integrity in the right temporal lobe might be a biomarker for genetic risk of BD. It is conceivable that the attenuated nature of these WM abnormalities present in unaffected siblings allows for some preservation of adaptive emotional regulation, whereas more pronounced alterations observed in patients is related to the marked emotional dysregulation characteristic of BD.
Authors: Setsu Wakana; Hangyi Jiang; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K Matsuo; M Kopecek; M A Nicoletti; J P Hatch; Y Watanabe; F G Nery; G Zunta-Soares; J C Soares Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Juan Martino; Philip C De Witt Hamer; Francesco Vergani; Christian Brogna; Enrique Marco de Lucas; Alfonso Vázquez-Barquero; Juan A García-Porrero; Hugues Duffau Journal: J Anat Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Emma Sprooten; Jessika E Sussmann; April Clugston; Anna Peel; James McKirdy; T William J Moorhead; Seonaid Anderson; Allen J Shand; Stephen Giles; Mark E Bastin; Jeremy Hall; Eve C Johnstone; Stephen M Lawrie; Andrew M McIntosh Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Frank Bellivier; Jean-Louis Golmard; Marcella Rietschel; Thomas G Schulze; Alain Malafosse; Martin Preisig; Patrick McKeon; Lesley Mynett-Johnson; Chantal Henry; Marion Leboyer Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Tuula Kieseppä; Theo G M van Erp; Jari Haukka; Timo Partonen; Tyrone D Cannon; Veli-Pekka Poutanen; Jaakko Kaprio; Jouko Lönnqvist Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Hidayet E Arat; Virginie-Anne Chouinard; Bruce M Cohen; Kathryn E Lewandowski; Dost Öngür Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: New Fei Ho; Zhengjun Li; Fang Ji; Mingyuan Wang; Carissa N Kuswanto; Min Yi Sum; Han Ying Tng; Yih Yian Sitoh; Kang Sim; Juan Zhou Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Emma Sprooten; Jennifer Barrett; D Reese McKay; Emma E Knowles; Samuel R Mathias; Anderson M Winkler; Margaret S Brumbaugh; Stefanie Landau; Lindsay Cyr; Peter Kochunov; David C Glahn Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Emma Sprooten; Margaret S Brumbaugh; Emma E M Knowles; D Reese McKay; John Lewis; Jennifer Barrett; Stefanie Landau; Lindsay Cyr; Peter Kochunov; Anderson M Winkler; Godfrey D Pearlson; David C Glahn Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Scott C Fears; Susan K Service; Barbara Kremeyer; Carmen Araya; Xinia Araya; Julio Bejarano; Margarita Ramirez; Gabriel Castrillón; Juliana Gomez-Franco; Maria C Lopez; Gabriel Montoya; Patricia Montoya; Ileana Aldana; Terri M Teshiba; Zvart Abaryan; Noor B Al-Sharif; Marissa Ericson; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Jurjen J Luykx; Linda Navarro; Todd A Tishler; Lori Altshuler; George Bartzokis; Javier Escobar; David C Glahn; Jorge Ospina-Duque; Neil Risch; Andrés Ruiz-Linares; Paul M Thompson; Rita M Cantor; Carlos Lopez-Jaramillo; Gabriel Macaya; Julio Molina; Victor I Reus; Chiara Sabatti; Nelson B Freimer; Carrie E Bearden Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 21.596