Literature DB >> 23036841

A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke: a pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial.

Takashi Takebayashi1, Tetsuo Koyama, Satoru Amano, Keisuke Hanada, Mitsuru Tabusadani, Masashi Hosomi, Kohei Marumoto, Kayoko Takahashi, Kazuhisa Domen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term effects of the 'transfer package' in constraint-induced movement therapy, which is an optional protocol to facilitate actual use of the trained affected arm in activities of daily living.
DESIGN: A pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial with a blinded single assessor with six-month follow-up.
SETTING: Hospitalized care at university hospital.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-one post-stroke patients were quasi-randomized to either a group with transfer package during constraint-induced movement therapy or a control group (without transfer package).
INTERVENTIONS: The transfer package group received 4.5 hours of intensive task training and 0.5 hours of transfer package whereas the control group received 5.0 hours of intensive task training per day during 10 consecutive weekdays. MAIN MEASURES: Arm function was measured with Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Amount of Use score of Motor Activity Log.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were quasi-randomized, but data from two patients were missing from the long-term follow-up. Both groups showed increase in arm function postintervention. However, at six months' follow-up only the transfer package group showed consistent increase in arm function (with transfer package group versus control group; Fugl-Meyer Assessment, mean (± SD) from 48.6 ± 7.8 (preintervention) to 55.7 ± 4.5 (postintervention) and 59.0 ± 3.6 (six months postintervention) versus from 49.1 ± 5.5 to 52.8 ± 6.0 and 53.3 ± 4.9, P= 0.003; Amount of Use scale of Motor Activity Log, mean from 1.3 ± 0.55 (preintervention) to 2.12 ± 0.55 (postintervention) and 2.79 ± 0.98 (six months postintervention) versus from 1.18 ± 0.70 to 1.61 ± 0.54 and 1.65 ± 0.68, P= 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed the long-term effects of the transfer package in constraint-induced movement therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23036841     DOI: 10.1177/0269215512460779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  14 in total

1.  Predictors of Arm Nonuse in Chronic Stroke: A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Rini Varghese; Harrison Stoll; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Accelerating Stroke Recovery: Body Structures and Functions, Activities, Participation, and Quality of Life Outcomes From a Large Rehabilitation Trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Lewthwaite; Carolee J Winstein; Christianne J Lane; Sarah Blanton; Burl R Wagenheim; Monica A Nelsen; Alexander W Dromerick; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: a historical perspective with case exemplar from the accelerated skill acquisition program.

Authors:  Carolee Winstein; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Sarah R Blanton; Lois B Wolf; Laurie Wishart
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Generalizability of Results from Randomized Controlled Trials in Post-Stroke Physiotherapy.

Authors:  Matteo Paci; Claudia Prestera; Francesco Ferrarello
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 5.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-03

6.  Influences of hand dominance on the maintenance of benefits after home-based modified constraint-induced movement therapy in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Renata C M Lima; Lucas R Nascimento; Stella M Michaelsen; Janaine C Polese; Natália D Pereira; Luci F Teixeira-Salmela
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Robot-assisted and conventional therapies produce distinct rehabilitative trends in stroke survivors.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Verena Klamroth-Marganska; Carolee J Winstein; Robert Riener
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Video Game Rehabilitation for Outpatient Stroke (VIGoROUS): protocol for a multi-center comparative effectiveness trial of in-home gamified constraint-induced movement therapy for rehabilitation of chronic upper extremity hemiparesis.

Authors:  Lynne V Gauthier; Chelsea Kane; Alexandra Borstad; Nancy Strahl; Gitendra Uswatte; Edward Taub; David Morris; Alli Hall; Melissa Arakelian; Victor Mark
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 9.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-07

10.  Sequencing bilateral robot-assisted arm therapy and constraint-induced therapy improves reach to press and trunk kinematics in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Yu-wei Hsieh; Rong-jiuan Liing; Keh-chung Lin; Ching-yi Wu; Tsan-hon Liou; Jui-chi Lin; Jen-wen Hung
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.