OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine potential prognostic value of total lesion glycolysis (TLG) calculated from combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 126 patients with OSCC who underwent PET/CT before definitive treatment by radical surgery. The metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was calculated for the primary tumor according to an absolute standardized uptake value (SUV) of 3. TLG was calculated as MTV × the average SUV. The nodal SUVmax was also recorded. The median value of SUVmax and TLG were used to divide the patients into two categories (high and low). Patients were followed up until death or for at least 24 months from their surgery. Disease-free (DFS) and disease-specific survivals (DSS) were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: The median TLG of the primary tumor ((T)TLG) was 71.4, and the median nodal SUVmax ((N)SUV) was 7.5. Patients with high (T)TLG (≥ median) had a 2-year DFS of 52% whereas the DFS was 74% for those with a low (T)TLG (P=0.007); the 2-year-DSS rates were 53% vs. 84%, respectively (P<0.001). Similarly, patients with high (N)SUVmax (≥ median) had a 2-year DFS of 42% vs. 70% for patients with a low (N)SUVmax (P=0.001); the 2-year-DSS rates were 39% vs. 78%, respectively (P<0.001). In multivariate analyses, (T)TLG, (N)SUVmax, and pathological nodal status were independent prognostic factors for the 2-year DSS. A 3-point prognostic scoring system was formulated based on the presence or absence of the independent factors. Patients with positive neck nodes, high (N)SUVmax, and high (T)TLG (score 3) had a 32-fold higher risk of cancer death compared with those lacking such risk factors (2-year-DSS=26% vs. 97%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Primary tumor TLG is an independent prognostic factor for cancer control and survival in patients with OSCC. A prognostic scoring system that includes primary tumor TLG, nodal SUVmax, and pathological neck status may be useful for risk stratification in this group of patients.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine potential prognostic value of total lesion glycolysis (TLG) calculated from combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 126 patients with OSCC who underwent PET/CT before definitive treatment by radical surgery. The metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was calculated for the primary tumor according to an absolute standardized uptake value (SUV) of 3. TLG was calculated as MTV × the average SUV. The nodal SUVmax was also recorded. The median value of SUVmax and TLG were used to divide the patients into two categories (high and low). Patients were followed up until death or for at least 24 months from their surgery. Disease-free (DFS) and disease-specific survivals (DSS) were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: The median TLG of the primary tumor ((T)TLG) was 71.4, and the median nodal SUVmax ((N)SUV) was 7.5. Patients with high (T)TLG (≥ median) had a 2-year DFS of 52% whereas the DFS was 74% for those with a low (T)TLG (P=0.007); the 2-year-DSS rates were 53% vs. 84%, respectively (P<0.001). Similarly, patients with high (N)SUVmax (≥ median) had a 2-year DFS of 42% vs. 70% for patients with a low (N)SUVmax (P=0.001); the 2-year-DSS rates were 39% vs. 78%, respectively (P<0.001). In multivariate analyses, (T)TLG, (N)SUVmax, and pathological nodal status were independent prognostic factors for the 2-year DSS. A 3-point prognostic scoring system was formulated based on the presence or absence of the independent factors. Patients with positive neck nodes, high (N)SUVmax, and high (T)TLG (score 3) had a 32-fold higher risk of cancer death compared with those lacking such risk factors (2-year-DSS=26% vs. 97%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION:Primary tumorTLG is an independent prognostic factor for cancer control and survival in patients with OSCC. A prognostic scoring system that includes primary tumorTLG, nodal SUVmax, and pathological neck status may be useful for risk stratification in this group of patients.
Authors: A Tuba Kendi; Amanda Corey; Kelly R Magliocca; Dana C Nickleach; James Galt; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Mark W El-Deiry; J Trad Wadsworth; Patricia A Hudgins; Nabil F Saba; David M Schuster Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2015-03-14 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Jon Cacicedo; Arturo Navarro; Olga Del Hoyo; Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga; Filippo Alongi; Jose A Medina; Olgun Elicin; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile; Pedro Bilbao; Francisco Casquero; Berardino de Bari; Alan Dal Pra Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Michael R Folkert; Jeremy Setton; Aditya P Apte; Milan Grkovski; Robert J Young; Heiko Schöder; Wade L Thorstad; Nancy Y Lee; Joseph O Deasy; Jung Hun Oh Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Arman Rahmim; C Ross Schmidtlein; Andrew Jackson; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Charles Marcus; Saeed Ashrafinia; Madjid Soltani; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 3.609