Lindsay M Bearne1,2, Brittannia Volkmer1, Janet Peacock1,3, Mandeep Sekhon1,2, Graham Fisher1, Melissa N Galea Holmes1,4, Abdel Douiri1, Aliya Amirova1, Dina Farran1, Sophia Quirke-McFarlane5, Bijan Modarai6, Catherine Sackley1,7, John Weinman5, Julie Bieles1. 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 2. Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Epidemiology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. 4. Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration North Thames, London, United Kingdom. 5. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 6. Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London and British Health Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom. 7. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Importance: Home-based walking exercise interventions are recommended for people with peripheral artery disease (PAD), but evidence of their efficacy has been mixed. Objective: To investigate the effect of a home-based, walking exercise behavior change intervention delivered by physical therapists in adults with PAD and intermittent claudication compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized clinical trial including 190 adults with PAD and intermittent claudication in 6 hospitals in the United Kingdom between January 2018 and March 2020; final follow-up was September 8, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive a walking exercise behavior change intervention delivered by physical therapists trained to use a motivational approach (n = 95) or usual care (n = 95). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-minute walking distance at 3-month follow-up (minimal clinically important difference, 8-20 m). There were 8 secondary outcomes, 3 of which were the Walking Estimated Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH) questionnaire (score range, 0 [best performance] to 100), the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (score range, 0 to 80 [80 indicates negative perception of illness]), and the Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire (score range, 3 to 21 [21 indicates best attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, or intentions]); a minimal clinically important difference was not defined for these instruments. Results: Among 190 randomized participants (mean age 68 years, 30% women, 79% White race, mean baseline 6-minute walking distance, 361.0 m), 148 (78%) completed 3-month follow-up. The 6-minute walking distance changed from 352.9 m at baseline to 380.6 m at 3 months in the intervention group and from 369.8 m to 372.1 m in the usual care group (adjusted mean between-group difference, 16.7 m [95% CI, 4.2 m to 29.2 m]; P = .009). Of the 8 secondary outcomes, 5 were not statistically significant. At 6-month follow-up, baseline WELCH scores changed from 18.0 to 27.8 in the intervention group and from 20.7 to 20.7 in the usual care group (adjusted mean between-group difference, 7.4 [95% CI, 2.5 to 12.3]; P = .003), scores on the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire changed from 45.7 to 38.9 in the intervention group and from 44.0 to 45.8 in the usual care group (adjusted mean between-group difference, -6.6 [95% CI, -9.9 to -3.4]; P < .001), and scores on the attitude component of the Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire changed from 14.7 to 15.4 in the intervention group and from 14.6 to 13.9 in the usual care group (adjusted mean between-group difference, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.3 to 2.5]; P = .02). Thirteen serious adverse events occurred in the intervention group, compared with 3 in the usual care group. All were determined to be unrelated or unlikely to be related to the study. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with PAD and intermittent claudication, a home-based, walking exercise behavior change intervention, compared with usual care, resulted in improved walking distance at 3 months. Further research is needed to determine the durability of these findings. Trial Registrations: ISRCTN Identifier: 14501418; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03238222.
Importance: Home-based walking exercise interventions are recommended for people with peripheral artery disease (PAD), but evidence of their efficacy has been mixed. Objective: To investigate the effect of a home-based, walking exercise behavior change intervention delivered by physical therapists in adults with PAD and intermittent claudication compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized clinical trial including 190 adults with PAD and intermittent claudication in 6 hospitals in the United Kingdom between January 2018 and March 2020; final follow-up was September 8, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive a walking exercise behavior change intervention delivered by physical therapists trained to use a motivational approach (n = 95) or usual care (n = 95). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-minute walking distance at 3-month follow-up (minimal clinically important difference, 8-20 m). There were 8 secondary outcomes, 3 of which were the Walking Estimated Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH) questionnaire (score range, 0 [best performance] to 100), the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (score range, 0 to 80 [80 indicates negative perception of illness]), and the Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire (score range, 3 to 21 [21 indicates best attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, or intentions]); a minimal clinically important difference was not defined for these instruments. Results: Among 190 randomized participants (mean age 68 years, 30% women, 79% White race, mean baseline 6-minute walking distance, 361.0 m), 148 (78%) completed 3-month follow-up. The 6-minute walking distance changed from 352.9 m at baseline to 380.6 m at 3 months in the intervention group and from 369.8 m to 372.1 m in the usual care group (adjusted mean between-group difference, 16.7 m [95% CI, 4.2 m to 29.2 m]; P = .009). Of the 8 secondary outcomes, 5 were not statistically significant. At 6-month follow-up, baseline WELCH scores changed from 18.0 to 27.8 in the intervention group and from 20.7 to 20.7 in the usual care group (adjusted mean between-group difference, 7.4 [95% CI, 2.5 to 12.3]; P = .003), scores on the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire changed from 45.7 to 38.9 in the intervention group and from 44.0 to 45.8 in the usual care group (adjusted mean between-group difference, -6.6 [95% CI, -9.9 to -3.4]; P < .001), and scores on the attitude component of the Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire changed from 14.7 to 15.4 in the intervention group and from 14.6 to 13.9 in the usual care group (adjusted mean between-group difference, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.3 to 2.5]; P = .02). Thirteen serious adverse events occurred in the intervention group, compared with 3 in the usual care group. All were determined to be unrelated or unlikely to be related to the study. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with PAD and intermittent claudication, a home-based, walking exercise behavior change intervention, compared with usual care, resulted in improved walking distance at 3 months. Further research is needed to determine the durability of these findings. Trial Registrations: ISRCTN Identifier: 14501418; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03238222.
Authors: Cora L Craig; Alison L Marshall; Michael Sjöström; Adrian E Bauman; Michael L Booth; Barbara E Ainsworth; Michael Pratt; Ulf Ekelund; Agneta Yngve; James F Sallis; Pekka Oja Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Jack M Guralnik; Michael H Criqui; Kiang Liu; Melina R Kibbe; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Kiang Liu; Jack M Guralnik; Michael H Criqui; Bonnie Spring; Lu Tian; Kathryn Domanchuk; Luigi Ferrucci; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Melina Kibbe; Huimin Tao; Lihui Zhao; Yihua Liao; W Jack Rejeski Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Naomi A Newman-Beinart; Sam Norton; Dominic Dowling; Dimitri Gavriloff; Chiara Vari; John A Weinman; Emma L Godfrey Journal: Physiotherapy Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Bonnie Spring; Jeffrey S Berger; Diane Treat-Jacobson; Michael S Conte; Mark A Creager; Michael H Criqui; Luigi Ferrucci; Heather L Gornik; Jack M Guralnik; Elizabeth A Hahn; Peter Henke; Melina R Kibbe; Debra Kohlman-Trighoff; Lingyu Li; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Walter McCarthy; Tamar S Polonsky; Christopher Skelly; Lu Tian; Lihui Zhao; Dongxue Zhang; W Jack Rejeski Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Lu Tian; Michael H Criqui; Luigi Ferrucci; Michael S Conte; Lihui Zhao; Lingyu Li; Robert Sufit; Tamar S Polonsky; Melina R Kibbe; Philip Greenland; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Mariana Romano de Lira; Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira; Roberta Aniceto França; Ana Claudia Pereira; Emma L Godfrey; Thais Cristina Chaves Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 2.362