BACKGROUND: Evidence from prospective studies on intake of meat and fish and risk of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) is scarce. We prospectively investigated the association of meat and fish intake with risk of SCC of the UADT and the possible mechanism via heme iron in the large multicenter European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. METHODS: Multivariable proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks (RR) of SCC of the UADT in relation to intake of total meat, as well as subtypes of meat, fish, and heme iron among 348,738 individuals from 7 European countries. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 11.8 years, a total of 682 incident cases of UADT SCC were accrued. Intake of processed meat was positively associated with risk of SCC of the UADT in the total cohort [highest vs. lowest quintile: RR = 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.94], however, in stratified analyses, this association was confined to the group of current smokers (highest vs. lowest quintile: RR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.22-2.93). Red meat, poultry, fish, and heme iron were not consistently related to UADT SCC. CONCLUSION: Higher intake of processed meat was positively associated with SCC of the UADT among smokers. Although this finding was stable in various sensitivity analyses, we cannot rule out residual confounding by smoking. Confirmation in future studies and identification of biologic mechanisms is warranted. IMPACT: Smokers may further increase their risk for SCC of the UADT if they additionally consume large amounts of processed meat.
BACKGROUND: Evidence from prospective studies on intake of meat and fish and risk of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) is scarce. We prospectively investigated the association of meat and fish intake with risk of SCC of the UADT and the possible mechanism via hemeiron in the large multicenter European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. METHODS: Multivariable proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks (RR) of SCC of the UADT in relation to intake of total meat, as well as subtypes of meat, fish, and hemeiron among 348,738 individuals from 7 European countries. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 11.8 years, a total of 682 incident cases of UADTSCC were accrued. Intake of processed meat was positively associated with risk of SCC of the UADT in the total cohort [highest vs. lowest quintile: RR = 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.94], however, in stratified analyses, this association was confined to the group of current smokers (highest vs. lowest quintile: RR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.22-2.93). Red meat, poultry, fish, and hemeiron were not consistently related to UADTSCC. CONCLUSION: Higher intake of processed meat was positively associated with SCC of the UADT among smokers. Although this finding was stable in various sensitivity analyses, we cannot rule out residual confounding by smoking. Confirmation in future studies and identification of biologic mechanisms is warranted. IMPACT: Smokers may further increase their risk for SCC of the UADT if they additionally consume large amounts of processed meat.
Authors: Helena F Balder; Johande Vogel; Margje C J F Jansen; Matty P Weijenberg; Piet A van den Brandt; Susanne Westenbrink; Roelof van der Meer; R Alexandra Goldbohm Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Gina D Tran; Xiu-Di Sun; Christian C Abnet; Jin-Hu Fan; Sanford M Dawsey; Zhi-Wei Dong; Steven D Mark; You-Lin Qiao; Philip R Taylor Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2005-01-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: N Slimani; G Deharveng; I Unwin; D A T Southgate; J Vignat; G Skeie; S Salvini; M Parpinel; A Møller; J Ireland; W Becker; A Farran; S Westenbrink; E Vasilopoulou; J Unwin; A Borgejordet; S Rohrmann; S Church; P Gnagnarella; C Casagrande; M van Bakel; M Niravong; M C Boutron-Ruault; C Stripp; A Tjønneland; A Trichopoulou; K Georga; S Nilsson; I Mattisson; J Ray; H Boeing; M Ocké; P H M Peeters; P Jakszyn; P Amiano; D Engeset; E Lund; M Santucci de Magistris; C Sacerdote; A Welch; S Bingham; A F Subar; E Riboli Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-03-21 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Shawn A Zamani; Kathleen M McClain; Barry I Graubard; Linda M Liao; Christian C Abnet; Michael B Cook; Jessica L Petrick Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Andy Perloy; Denise H E Maasland; Piet A van den Brandt; Bernd Kremer; Leo J Schouten Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: S Vingeliene; D S M Chan; A R Vieira; E Polemiti; C Stevens; L Abar; D Navarro Rosenblatt; D C Greenwood; T Norat Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: F Bravi; C Bosetti; M Filomeno; F Levi; W Garavello; S Galimberti; E Negri; C La Vecchia Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 7.640