BACKGROUND: The evidence for red meat as a determinant of colorectal cancer remains equivocal, which might be explained by differences in heme content. Heme is the pro-oxidant, iron-containing porphyrin pigment of meat and its content depends on the type of meat. Chlorophyll from green vegetables might modify this association. METHODS: The Netherlands Cohort Study was initiated in 1986 when a self-administered questionnaire on risk factors for cancer was completed by 120,852 subjects ages 55 to 69 years. After 9.3 years of follow-up through the Cancer Registry, 1,535 incident colorectal cancer cases (869 men and 666 women) were available. Nineteen of the 150 items in the validated dietary questionnaire related to consumption of specific types of fresh and processed meat. Heme iron content was calculated as a type-specific percentage of the total iron content and chlorophyll content of vegetables was derived from the literature. RESULTS: Multivariate rate ratios for quintiles of heme iron intake and colon cancer were 1.00, 0.98, 1.04, 1.13, and 1.29 (P(trend) = 0.10) among men and 1.00, 1.31, 1.44, 1.18, and 1.20 (P(trend) = 0.56) among women, respectively. No consistent associations were observed for rectal cancer. Rate ratios for colon cancer increased across successive quintiles of the ratio of heme/chlorophyll among men only (1.00, 1.08, 1.01, 1.32, and 1.43; P(trend) = 0.01). No associations were observed between fresh meat and colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest an elevated risk of colon cancer in men with increasing intake of heme iron and decreasing intake of chlorophyll. Further research is needed to confirm these results.
BACKGROUND: The evidence for red meat as a determinant of colorectal cancer remains equivocal, which might be explained by differences in heme content. Heme is the pro-oxidant, iron-containing porphyrin pigment of meat and its content depends on the type of meat. Chlorophyll from green vegetables might modify this association. METHODS: The Netherlands Cohort Study was initiated in 1986 when a self-administered questionnaire on risk factors for cancer was completed by 120,852 subjects ages 55 to 69 years. After 9.3 years of follow-up through the Cancer Registry, 1,535 incident colorectal cancer cases (869 men and 666 women) were available. Nineteen of the 150 items in the validated dietary questionnaire related to consumption of specific types of fresh and processed meat. Hemeiron content was calculated as a type-specific percentage of the total iron content and chlorophyll content of vegetables was derived from the literature. RESULTS: Multivariate rate ratios for quintiles of hemeiron intake and colon cancer were 1.00, 0.98, 1.04, 1.13, and 1.29 (P(trend) = 0.10) among men and 1.00, 1.31, 1.44, 1.18, and 1.20 (P(trend) = 0.56) among women, respectively. No consistent associations were observed for rectal cancer. Rate ratios for colon cancer increased across successive quintiles of the ratio of heme/chlorophyll among men only (1.00, 1.08, 1.01, 1.32, and 1.43; P(trend) = 0.01). No associations were observed between fresh meat and colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest an elevated risk of colon cancer in men with increasing intake of hemeiron and decreasing intake of chlorophyll. Further research is needed to confirm these results.
Authors: Tim Y Hou; Laurie A Davidson; Eunjoo Kim; Yang-Yi Fan; Natividad R Fuentes; Karen Triff; Robert S Chapkin Journal: Annu Rev Nutr Date: 2016-07-17 Impact factor: 11.848
Authors: Amanda J Cross; Rashmi Sinha; Richard J Wood; Xiaonan Xue; Wen-Yi Huang; Meredith Yeager; Richard B Hayes; Marc J Gunter Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-06-17
Authors: Amanda J Cross; Leah M Ferrucci; Adam Risch; Barry I Graubard; Mary H Ward; Yikyung Park; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Rashmi Sinha Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Heather A Ward; Alicia Gayle; Paula Jakszyn; Melissa Merritt; Beatrice Melin; Heinz Freisling; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anne Tjonneland; Anja Olsen; Christina C Dahm; Kim Overvad; Verena Katzke; Tilman Kühn; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Andreas Kyrozis; Domenico Palli; Vittorio Krogh; Rosario Tumino; Fulvio Ricceri; Amalia Mattiello; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; José Ramón Quirós; Antonio Agudo; Miguel Rodriguez-Barranco; Nerea Larrañaga; José M Huerta; Aurelio Barricarte; Emily Sonestedt; Isabel Drake; Maria Sandström; Ruth C Travis; Pietro Ferrari; Elio Riboli; Amanda J Cross Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Xuehong Zhang; Edward L Giovannucci; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Kana Wu; Charles S Fuchs; Michael Pollak; Walter C Willett; Jing Ma Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-09-11 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Noortje Ijssennagger; Clara Belzer; Guido J Hooiveld; Jan Dekker; Saskia W C van Mil; Michael Müller; Michiel Kleerebezem; Roelof van der Meer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L M Ferrucci; A J Cross; B I Graubard; L A Brinton; C A McCarty; R G Ziegler; X Ma; S T Mayne; R Sinha Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 7.640