Literature DB >> 23032983

Prevalence and predictors of columnar lined esophagus in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients undergoing upper endoscopy.

Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian1, Mandeep Singh, Neil Gupta, Srinivas Gaddam, Maria Giacchino, Sachin B Wani, Brian Moloney, April D Higbee, Amit Rastogi, Ajay Bansal, Prateek Sharma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE), the most important surrogate marker for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The need to document the presence of intestinal metaplasia in esophageal biopsies from a columnar lined esophagus (CLE) to diagnose BE is debated. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of CLE in a large cohort of GERD patients undergoing upper endoscopy.
METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting to the endoscopy unit at a tertiary referral center for their index upper endoscopy for evaluation of GERD symptoms were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Patients were asked to complete a validated GERD questionnaire that documents the onset of GERD symptoms (heartburn and acid regurgitation) and grades the frequency and severity of symptoms experienced over the past year. Demographic information, body mass index, and use of aspirin/nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were recorded. Endoscopic details including length of CLE, presence and size of hiatal hernia were noted. Patients with CLE (cases) were compared with those without CLE (controls) using Fischer's exact test and t-test. All factors that were statistically significant (P<0.05) were then entered into stepwise logistic regression to evaluate for independent predictors of CLE.
RESULTS: A total of 1058 patients with GERD symptoms were prospectively enrolled. On index endoscopy, the prevalence of CLE was 23.3%, whereas of CLE with documented intestinal metaplasia was 14.1%. On univariate analysis, male gender, Caucasian race, heartburn duration of >5 years, presence and size of hiatal hernia were significantly associated with the presence of CLE compared with controls (P<0.05). On multivariate analysis, heartburn duration >5 years (odds ratio (OR): 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-2.09, P=0.01), Caucasian race (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.42-4.03, P=0.001), and hiatal hernia (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.50-2.87, P<0.01) were found to be independent predictors for CLE. CLE length was significantly associated with the presence of intestinal metaplasia (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: If BE is defined by the presence of CLE alone on upper endoscopy, up to 25% of GERD patients are diagnosed with this lesion. Enrolling all these patients in surveillance programs would have significant ramifications on health-care resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23032983     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  22 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors affecting the Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-neoplasia sequence.

Authors:  Craig S Brown; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

2.  Regional Variability of Repeat Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Use in the National Veteran Population.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Garrett Cole; Nan Hu; William K Thompson; John Fang; Matthew Samore
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Predicting regression of Barrett's esophagus: results from a retrospective cohort of 1342 patients.

Authors:  Craig S Brown; Brittany Lapin; Chi Wang; Jay L Goldstein; John G Linn; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; Mark S Talamonti; John A Howington; Joann Carbray; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Reflux control is important in the management of Barrett's Esophagus: results from a retrospective 1,830 patient cohort.

Authors:  Craig S Brown; Brittany Lapin; Chi Wang; Jay L Goldstein; John G Linn; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; Mark S Talamonti; John A Howington; Joann Carbray; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Radical excision of Barrett's esophagus and complete recovery of normal squamous epithelium.

Authors:  Hirohito Mori; Hideki Kobara; Kazi Rafiq; Noriko Nishiyama; Shintaro Fujihara; Maki Ayagi; Tatsuo Yachida; Kiyohito Kato; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  The frequency of histologically confirmed Barrett's esophagus varies by the combination of ethnicity and gender.

Authors:  Sian S Chisholm; Joe E Khoury; M Mazen Jamal; Carlos Palacio; Sunitha Pudhota; Kenneth J Vega
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Screening for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Sarmed S Sami; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03

Review 9.  Screening for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: rationale, recent progress, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Sarmed S Sami; Krish Ragunath; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Differences in intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus patients in an ethnically diverse south London population.

Authors:  Rhys Hewett; Vivek Chhaya; Derek Chan; Jin-Yong Kang; Andrew Poullis
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.