Literature DB >> 29330747

Recent Advances in Screening for Barrett's Esophagus.

Sarmed S Sami1, Prasad G Iyer2.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a pressing need for effective strategies to halt the increase in both the incidence and mortality of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Screening for Barrett's esophagus, which is the only known precursor of EAC, remains a ripe area for research, particularly with regard to identifying the target population, screening tools, and management of screen-detected populations. This review aims to explore in depth the rationale for screening for Barrett's esophagus, recent biotechnological advances which may have the potential of making screening feasible, and also highlight the challenges which will have to be overcome in order make screening for BE a realistic prospect. RECENT
FINDINGS: Imaging techniques such as portable transnasal endoscopy have the advantage of providing an immediate diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus as well as other significant pathologies such as reflux esophagitis and cancer; however, larger studies in non-enriched community screening populations are required to evaluate their feasibility. The capsule sponge is a cell-sampling device coupled with a biomarker, which has been most extensively evaluated with very promising results as regards feasibility, acceptability, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness. Its effectiveness in increasing the detection of Barrett's esophagus in primary care is currently being evaluated. Several Barrett's esophagus risk prediction scores have been developed with variable degrees of accuracy. Several minimally and non-invasive screening techniques have been studied including imaging and cell-sampling devices. Barrett's risk assessment models need to be further validated in independent, relevant screening populations with clear cut-offs for recommending screening to be defined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s esophagus; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Risk stratification; Screening; Screening tools

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330747      PMCID: PMC6614868          DOI: 10.1007/s11938-018-0166-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  71 in total

1.  Office-based unsedated small-caliber endoscopy is equivalent to conventional sedated endoscopy in screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: a randomized and blinded comparison.

Authors:  Blair A Jobe; John G Hunter; Eugene Y Chang; Charles Y Kim; Glenn M Eisen; Jedediah D Robinson; Brian S Diggs; Robert W O'Rourke; Anne E Rader; Paul Schipper; David A Sauer; Jeffrey H Peters; David A Lieberman; Cynthia D Morris
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia.

Authors:  Amitabh Chak; Ashley Faulx; Charis Eng; William Grady; Margaret Kinnard; Heather Ochs-Balcom; Gary Falk
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of PillCam ESO esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux diseases.

Authors:  Rami Eliakim; Virender K Sharma; Kamel Yassin; Samuel N Adler; Harold Jacob; David R Cave; Ritu Sachdev; Roger D Mitty; Dirk Hartmann; Dieter Schilling; Jurgen F Riemann; Simon Bar-Meir; Eytan Bardan; Brian Fennerty; Glenn Eisen; Douglas Faigel; Blair S Lewis; David E Fleischer
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Use of a simple symptom questionnaire to predict Barrett's esophagus in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L B Gerson; R Edson; P W Lavori; G Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Frederik Hvid-Jensen; Lars Pedersen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Peter Funch-Jensen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  A cost-utility analysis of ablative therapy for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Ma Somsouk; Ryan D Madanick; Jennifer P Thomas; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  A multibiomarker risk score helps predict risk for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Aaron P Thrift; Jose M Garcia; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Tatiana Benaglia; Linda D Sharples; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Gary W Falk; Prasad G Iyer; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic Testing for Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-02

2.  Is the age of diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma getting younger? Analysis at a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Alexandra Strauss; Eun Jeong Min; Qi Long; Peter Gabriel; Yu-Xiao Yang; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Hyperinsulinemia Promotes Esophageal Cancer Development in a Surgically-Induced Duodeno-Esophageal Reflux Murine Model.

Authors:  Diletta Arcidiacono; Arben Dedja; Cinzia Giacometti; Matteo Fassan; Daniele Nucci; Simona Francia; Federico Fabris; Alice Zaramella; Emily J Gallagher; Mauro Cassaro; Massimo Rugge; Derek LeRoith; Alfredo Alberti; Stefano Realdon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Assessment of Premalignant and Malignant Esophageal Lesions: Present and Future.

Authors:  Daniela Cornelia Lazăr; Mihaela Flavia Avram; Alexandra Corina Faur; Adrian Goldiş; Ioan Romoşan; Sorina Tăban; Mărioara Cornianu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Detection of circulating BMP5 as a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Ana C P Correia; Silvia Calpe; Nahid Mostafavi; Sanne Johanna Maria Hoefnagel; Maria Del Carmen Sancho-Serra; Patricia S de Koning; Kausilia K Krishnadath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparative Cost Effectiveness of Reflux-Based and Reflux-Independent Strategies for Barrett's Esophagus Screening.

Authors:  Sarmed S Sami; James P Moriarty; Jordan K Rosedahl; Bijan J Borah; David A Katzka; Kenneth K Wang; John B Kisiel; Krish Ragunath; Joel H Rubenstein; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 12.045

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.