Literature DB >> 23032567

Presence, fate and effects of the intense sweetener sucralose in the aquatic environment.

Knut Erik Tollefsen1, Luca Nizzetto, Duane B Huggett.   

Abstract

Sucralose (1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-b-D-fructo-furanosyl 4-chloro-4-deoxy-a-D-galactopyranoside), sold under the trade name Splenda, has been detected in municipal effluents and surface waters in the United States and Europe. The environmental presence of sucralose has led to interest in the possibility of toxic effects in non-target species. This review presents an environmental risk assessment of sucralose based on available data concerning its presence, fate and effects in the environment. Sucralose, which is made by selective chlorination of sucrose, is a highly stable compound, which undergoes negligible metabolism in mammals, including humans, and displays a low biodegradation potential in the environment. This intense sweetener is highly soluble in water, displays a low bioaccumulation potential and a low sorption potential to soil and organic matter, and thus is predominantly present in the water column. The predicted environmental concentration (PEC) for sucralose, based on measured data in surface waters, was determined to be 10 μg/L. Aquatic toxicity studies using standardized, validated protocols used in regulatory decision making indicate that sucralose does not alter survival, growth and reproduction of aquatic organisms (such as plants, algae, crustaceans and fish) at concentrations >9000 times higher than those detected in the environment. Some studies, using non-standardized protocols, have reported behavioral and other non-traditional responses in aquatic organisms, but the relevance of these findings for assessing adverse effects on individuals and populations will require further investigation. In terms of traditional risk assessment, the proposed predicted no effect concentration for aquatic organisms (PNEC) was determined to be 0.93 mg/L, based on the lowest no effect concentration (NOEC) from a validated chronic study with mysid shrimp and an application factor of 100. The resultant PEC/PNEC quotient was determined to be well below 1 (PEC/PNEC=0.08), thus indicating a limited risk to the environment using traditional ecological risk assessment approaches.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23032567     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  11 in total

Review 1.  Oxidation of artificial sweetener sucralose by advanced oxidation processes: a review.

Authors:  Virender K Sharma; Mehmet Oturan; Hyunook Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A synoptic survey of select wastewater-tracer compounds and the pesticide imidacloprid in Florida's ambient freshwaters.

Authors:  James Silvanima; Andy Woeber; Stephanie Sunderman-Barnes; Rick Copeland; Christopher Sedlacek; Thomas Seal
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Contaminants of emerging concern in surface waters in Barbados, West Indies.

Authors:  Quincy A Edwards; Sergei M Kulikov; Leah D Garner-O'Neale; Chris D Metcalfe; Tamanna Sultana
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans formed from sucralose at high temperatures.

Authors:  Shujun Dong; Guorui Liu; Jicheng Hu; Minghui Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Fate of artificial sweeteners through wastewater treatment plants and water treatment processes.

Authors:  Shaoli Li; Yuhang Ren; Yingying Fu; Xingsheng Gao; Cong Jiang; Gang Wu; Hongqiang Ren; Jinju Geng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Removal of artificial sweeteners and their effects on microbial communities in sequencing batch reactors.

Authors:  Shaoli Li; Jinju Geng; Gang Wu; Xingsheng Gao; Yingying Fu; Hongqiang Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Environmental Impact of the Presence, Distribution, and Use of Artificial Sweeteners as Emerging Sources of Pollution.

Authors:  Ab Qayoom Naik; Tabassum Zafar; Vinoy Kumar Shrivastava
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2021-04-14

8.  Sucralose induces biochemical responses in Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Ann-Kristin Eriksson Wiklund; Margaretha Adolfsson-Erici; Birgitta Liewenborg; Elena Gorokhova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  A Review of the Environmental Fate and Effects of Acesulfame-Potassium.

Authors:  Kerry Belton; Edward Schaefer; Patrick D Guiney
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 10.  Analytical Methods for Determination of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners in Foodstuffs.

Authors:  Viki Oktavirina; Nadhila B Prabawati; Rohmah Nur Fathimah; Miguel Palma; Kiki Adi Kurnia; Noviyan Darmawan; Brian Yulianto; Widiastuti Setyaningsih
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.