Literature DB >> 23029587

Genetic characterizations of Giardia duodenalis in sheep and goats in Heilongjiang Province, China and possibility of zoonotic transmission.

Weizhe Zhang1, Xiaoli Zhang, Rongjun Wang, Aiqin Liu, Yujuan Shen, Hong Ling, Jianping Cao, Fengkun Yang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Longxian Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Giardia duodenalis is a widespread intestinal protozoan of both humans and mammals. To date, few epidemiological studies have assessed the potential and importance of zoonotic transmission; and the human giardiasis burden attributable to G. duodenalis of animal origin is unclear. No information about occurrence and genotyping data of sheep and goat giardiasis is available in China. The aim of the present study was to determine prevalence and distribution of G. duodenalis in sheep and goats in Heilongjiang Province, China, and to characterize G. duodenalis isolates and assess the possibility of zoonotic transmission. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A total of 678 fecal specimens were collected from sheep and goats on six farms ranging in age from one month to four years in Heilongjiang Province, China. The average prevalence of G. duodenalis infection was 5.0% (34/678) by microscopy after Lugol's iodine staining, with 5.6% (30/539) for the sheep versus 2.9% (4/139) for the goats. Molecular analysis was conducted on 34 G. duodenalis isolates based on the triosephosphate isomerase (tpi) gene. 29 tpi gene sequences were successfully obtained and identified as assemblages A (n = 4), B (n = 2) and E (n = 23). High heterogeneity was observed within assemblage E at the tpi locus, with five novel subtypes found out of seven subtypes. Two subtypes of assemblage A were detected, including subtype AI (n = 3) and a novel subtype (designated as subtype AIV) (n = 1). Two assemblage B isolates were identical to each other in the tpi gene sequences.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first report of G. duodenalis infections in sheep and goats in China. The present data revealed the unique endemicity on prevalence, distribution and genetic characterization of G. duodenalis in sheep and goats in Heilongjiang Province. The findings of assemblages A and B in sheep and goats implied the potential of zoonotic transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23029587      PMCID: PMC3447956          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1935-2727


Introduction

Giardia duodenalis (syn. Giardia lamblia, Giardia intestinalis) is one of the most common protozoa in humans and animals. Giardiasis of humans and animals has a wide spectrum of clinical signs, including the onset of diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, vomiting, nausea and/or weight loss. The parasite can lead to growth and development retardation of children, even in asymptomatic cases [1], and is also of significant clinical and economic importance in livestock and pet animals [2]–[4]. To date, molecular data revealed the presence of seven assemblages (A to G) within G. duodenalis based on genetic analysis and host specificity. In a recent study, assemblage H has been described in marine vertebrates [5]. Among them, assemblages A and B have the widest host range. They both have the ability to infect humans and a variety of mammals, including livestock, dogs, cats and wildlife [6], [7]. Assemblages C, D, E, F and G seem to be host specific for nonhuman species. However, assemblages C, D, E and F have been isolated from humans, but at a very low prevalence [7]. Outbreaks of human giardiasis are most frequently waterborne and caused by contamination of drinking water, although other routes have also been described [8], [9]. G. duodenalis is one of the most common pathogens in water-associated outbreaks of parasitic protozoan diseases, accounting for 40.6% (132/325) out of total outbreaks [10]. The sources of contamination of water supplies may come from humans, farm animals and wildlife. Due to the lack of data of transmission dynamics between humans and animals, the role of animals in the spread of infections remains unclear. Contact with farm animals has been pointed out as a risk factor of human infection of G. duodenalis in case control studies [11], [12]. The previous report of an outbreak of sheep giardiasis with the death of some animals in Central Italy is of concern for sheep farmers [3]. Years of epidemiological data have documented the occurrence of G. duodenalis infection in sheep and goats, indicating a wide range in prevalence from 1.5% to 55.6% in sheep and from 12.3% to 42.2% in goats [13]. Studies using molecular analysis have confirmed the presence of assemblages A, B and E of G. duodenalis in sheep and goats. Assemblage E was the major genotype in sheep/goats in most countries, with assemblage A being occasionally detected in Australia, Sweden, the USA, Belgium, and Spain and with assemblage B being occasionally detected in Norway and Spain [14]–[21]. In a study in Australia, assemblage A is the most common subtype in sheep [22]. Interestingly, only G. duodenalis assemblages A and B have been reported in sheep in Italy, with an absence of assemblage E [3], [23]. In China, there are no reports about the investigations and genotyping data of sheep and goat giardiasis so far. China has one of the largest populations of sheep and goat flocks [24]. To understand the prevalence and distribution of G. duodenalis in sheep and goats in China, a survey of G. duodenalis was conducted in sheep and goats in Heilongjiang Province, and the tpi gene sequences of G. duodenalis isolates were analyzed for genetic characterization and assessment of the potential of zoonotic transmission at both genotyping and subtyping levels.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Before beginning work on the study, we contacted the farm owners and obtained their permission to have their animals involved. During specimen collection, all animal work followed guidelines in accordance with the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals, and approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Harbin Medical University.

Specimen collection

A total of 678 fecal specimens (539 from sheep and 139 from goats) were randomly collected on six farms within Heilongjiang Province, China in a two-year survey from October 2009 to November 2011 (Table 1). The specimens were taken directly from the rectum of each animal with sterile plastic gloves. For each animal, the sampling date, species, ages and the identification number were recorded. Their ages ranged from one month to four years. The specimens were transported to the laboratory in a cool box and then stored at 4°C and processed within two days of collection. Each fecal specimen was directly used to smear three slides for iodine wet mount staining. Wet smears were examined for the presence of G. duodenalis cysts by light field microscopy at 400× magnification. All G. duodenalis-positive specimens were stored in 2.5% potassium dichromate solution at 4°C before DNA extraction.
Table 1

Prevalence and assemblage distribution of G. duodenalis on six farms of sheep and goats in Heilongjiang Province.

FarmAnimal speciesNo. of Positive/No. of Examined (%)No. of G. duodenalis assemblages A, B and E
Age group (month)
<23–67–11>12Total
Farm1sheep4/15 (26.7)5/54 (9.3)1/21 (4.8)1/46 (2.2)11/136 (8.1)E(9)
Farm2sheep2/11 (18.2)2/41 (4.9)1/29 (3.4)0/23 (0)5/104 (4.8)A(1), B(2)
Farm3sheep1/6 (16.7)2/33 (6.1)2/41 (4.9)0/10 (0)5/90(5.6)E(4)
Farm4sheep2/13 (15.4)4/42 (9.5)3/58 (5.2)1/35 (2.9)10/148 (6.8)A(3), E(6)
Farm5sheep0/8 (0)0/22 (0)0/13 (0)0/18 (0)0/61 (0)
Farm6goat2/19 (10.5)1/21 (4.8)1/48 (2.1)0/51 (0)4/139 (2.9)E(4)
Total11/72 (15.3)14/233 (6.0)8/220 (3.6)2/183 (1.1)34/678 (5.0)A(4), B(2), E(23)

DNA extraction

G. duodenalis-positive fecal specimens were washed four times with distilled water to remove potassium dichromate from the solution. Genomic DNA was directly extracted from approximately 200 mg of the fecal pellet using a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAgen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer's instruction. DNA was eluted in 200 µL of AE elution buffer and DNA preparation was stored at −20°C prior to use in PCR analysis.

G. duodenalis genotyping and subtyping

G. duodenalis isolates were genotyped and subtyped at the tpi locus using a nested PCR which amplifies an approximately 530-bp fragment as previously described [25]. All secondary PCR products were purified and directly sequenced. Each DNA preparation was analyzed at least twice by PCR. Genotypes and subtypes of G. duodenalis isolates were identified by analyzing and comparing the tpi gene sequences obtained in the present study with those published in GenBank.

DNA sequence analysis

All secondary PCR products were sequenced with secondary PCR primers on an ABI PRISM™ 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA), using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, USA). Accuracy of the sequencing data was confirmed by sequencing in both directions and a new PCR product once more if necessary for some isolates. Nucleotide sequences obtained in the present study were aligned with each other and reference sequences downloaded from GenBank and analyzed using Clustal X 1.83.

Results

Prevalence of G. duodenalis

678 fecal specimens were examined by microscopy after iodine staining. 34 of which were positive for G. duodenalis cysts. The average prevalence of G. duodenalis infection was 5.0% (34/678), with 5.6% (30/539) for the sheep versus 2.9% (4/139) for the goats. With the exception of Farm 5 where G. duodenalis infection was absent, the parasite was detected on the other five farms (Table 1).

Assemblage distribution of G. duodenalis

PCR products were obtained from 32 of 34 G. duodenalis -positive specimens. However, only 29 were successfully sequenced at the tpi locus. The sequences obtained were aligned with reference sequences and identified as three G. duodenalis assemblages: 13.8% (4/29) for assemblage A, 6.9% (2/29) for assemblage B and 79.3% (23/29) for assemblage E. Assemblage E was not only the most prevalent but also the most widespread in the investigated areas, accounting for assemblage E on four farms, assemblage A on two farms and assemblage B on only one farm (Table 1).

Genetic diversity of assemblages A, B and E

Sequence analysis of the tpi gene of G. duodenalis revealed the presence of two subtypes out of four assemblages A isolates. Three assemblage A isolates belonged to subtype AI (JQ928711), which had 100% similarity with the human-derived subtype AI sequences from Malaysia (HQ836660), France (FJ560569), the USA (EF688031 to EF688043), Peru (EF688038, EF688039), Australia (EF688031, EF688034), Israel (EF688040), Egypt (EF688036) and Henan of China (GU564274 to GU564276). It was also identical to subtype AI sequences from animals, including sheep in Australia (GQ444447), cattle (EF654693, AY655704) in the USA, and cats (AB569393) in Japan. The remaining one was a novel subtype of assemblage A (JQ928710), having four, four and five base differences compared to AI, AII and AIII, respectively (Table 2). The genetic variations led to our proposal of the designation of subtype AIV. The same sequences have been found in human-derived assemblage A isolates from Sweden (GQ329677, GQ329678) and Western Sahara (EU041756), and cat-derived assemblage A isolates (AB569394, AB569398) from Japan. In the present study, two sequences of assemblage B were identical to each other at the tpi locus (JQ928712) and had 100% homology with those from dairy cattle (JN162353), rabbits (HQ397719) and wastewater (HQ603781) in the investigated areas.
Table 2

Variations in the TPI nucleotide sequences among subtypes of G. duodenalis assemblage A in sheep and goats in Heilongjiang Province.

SequenceNucleotide at positionAccession no. in GenBank
Subtype284192102210370
Ref sequencesAITGTTACGU564274
AIITGTCATGU564277
AIIITGCTACEF654695
This studyAITGTTACJQ928711
AIVCATCGCJQ928710
The intra-genotypic diversity of G. duodenalis assemblage E was observed in the present study. Seven representative sequences (JQ928713 to JQ928717, JQ951964, JQ951965) were obtained out of 23 tpi gene sequences. They were respectively named as subtypes E-I to E-VII for convenient description, with one to four base variations noted at nine different nucleotide sites (Table 3) using the AY655706 as a reference sequence. The same sequences have been described, with subtype E-I (n = 9) having been found in cattle (AY655706, EF654682, AY228646, JN162347), and subtype E-II (n = 2) in sheep (GQ444461). The remaining five subtypes (E-III to E-VII) were never identical to any reported assemblage E subtypes and all of them had a low frequency, accounting for 13.0% (3/23) for E-IV and EVII, and 8.7% (2/23) for EIII, E-V and E-VI.
Table 3

Variations in the TPI nucleotide sequences among subtypes of G. duodenalis of assemblage E in sheep and goats in Heilongjiang Province.

Subtype (No.)Nucleotide at positionAccession no. in GenBank
457882108262303430441469
Ref sequenceTTACTTAGGAY655706
E-I(9)TTACTTAGGJQ928713
E-II(2)TTGCTTAAGJQ928714
E-III(2)CGATTTGGGJQ928715
E-IV(3)CTGCTTAGGJQ928716
E-V(2)TTGCCTAAGJQ928717
E-VI(2)TTACTTAGAJQ951964
E-VII(3)TTACTCAGGJQ951965
In the present study, even on some individual farms, we also observed the widespread occurrence of intra-genetic diversity of assemblage E at the tpi locus. At least two subtypes have been found on four farms for 23 isolates of assemblage E. For assemblage A, two subtypes representing four isolates have been found on Farm 2 and Farm 4, respectively (Table 4).
Table 4

G. duodenalis genotypes and subtypes identified in sheep and goats on farms in Heilongjiang Province.

FarmNo. of PositiveSubtype (No.)
Assemblage AAssemblage BAssemblage E
Farm19E-I(5), E-II(2), E-III(2)
Farm23AIV(1)B*(2)
Farm34E-I(2), E-VI(2)
Farm49AI(3)E-IV(3), E-VII(3)
Farm50
Farm64E-I(2), E-V(2)
Total29AI(3), AIV(1)B*(2)E-I(9), E-II(2), E-III(2), E-IV(3), E-V(2), E-VI(2),E-VII(3)

There is no clear subtyping in assemblage B currently.

There is no clear subtyping in assemblage B currently.

Discussion

The present study is the first to report the occurrence and genetic characterization of G. duodenalis in sheep and goats in China. The average infection rate for sheep would be 5.6% versus 2.9% for the goats, which was lower than those reported worldwide except in Italy (1.5%) [13]. Infection rates of G. duodenalis were noticed to be inversely associated with the age of animals, with the highest infection rate (17.0%) in lambs and (10.5%) in goat kids. There were an apparent declining infection rates with the increasing age of the animals (Table 1). Young animals were more susceptible to opportunistic parasites than adults. Thus, in the limited epidemiological studies of giardiasis of sheep and goats, the majority focused on the occurrence of G. duodenalis in lambs and goat kids. In a longitudinal study of lambs in Norway, overall prevalence of G. duodenalis was 23.0% at the first sampling and 31.0% at the second sampling [19]. In Belgium, the prevalence was 25.5% in lambs and 35.8% in goat kids [14]. A 42.0% infection rate of G. duodenalis was reported in (one to three)-month-old lambs in Spain [20]. In fact, infection rates are complicated and are often related to many factors, including detection methods, health status and age of the animals, size and structure of specimens, management system, geographical and seasonal differences [14]. Due to the lack of related epidemiological data on giardiasis of animals in the investigated areas, we could not give the reasons for the low prevalence in addition to the low sensitivity of morphological methods and the relative small number of specimens examined from less than two-month-old lambs and goat kids compared to other age groups in the present study. Four out of five sheep farms and the one goat farm had G. duodenalis infected animals, and infection rates ranged from 2.9% to 8.1% (Table 1). Farm 5 was not contaminated by G. duodenalis. This might be related to strict sanitation management with the farm being built newly. Currently, PCR-based molecular analysis techniques (DNA sequencing of PCR products and PCR-RFLP) have been developed and used to identify G. duodenalis-positive isolates [26]. Among the numerous target genes (such as the SSU rRNA, gdh, tpi, ef1α, bg, and variant surface protein [vsp] genes), tpi gene was frequently used to differentiate G. duodenalis at genotype and subtype levels because of the highest genetic heterogeneity at the locus [27]. In the present study, 29 partial tpi gene sequences were obtained, with 13.8% (4/29),6.9%(2/29) and 79.3% (23/29) for assemblages A, B and E, respectively. Assemblage E was detected on four farms, whereas assemblages A and B were detected on two farms and one farm, respectively (Table 1). Assemblage E was more prevalent and widespread than assemblages A and B in sheep and goats in the present study. Similar results were also commonly seen in sheep/goats, respectively in Belgium, Australia, Sweden, the USA, Norway, Spain and Mexico, where molecular epidemiological data have showed that assemblage E constituted the majority of G. duodenalis-positive specimens (percentages from 60.7% to 100%) [14]–[21], [28], [29]. Assemblage E seems to have apparent host preference. Molecular epidemiological data showed that assemblage E is the most common in cattle and pig in addition to sheep and goats [13]. The present results implied that sheep and goats in the investigated areas have been infected with assemblage E and posed a threat to other susceptible animals, including uninfected sheep and goats, cattle and pigs. Assemblage E might be less risky to humans based on the fact that it has only been isolated from three Egyptians [30]. It has been reported that G. duodenalis infections have an effect on growth and performance of animals, and most of relationship studies are only at the species level of G. duodenalis [31]. A recent study demonstrated that lambs infected with G. duodenalis could lead to decreased hot carcase weights and dressing percentage of sheep [32]. Up to date, no information is obtained on clinical symptoms of animal giardiasis resulting from assemblage E. Sequence analysis of the tpi gene of G. duodenalis revealed the presence of seven subtypes out of 23 assemblage E isolates. The most common subtype E-I (39.1%; 9/23) showed 100% similarity with the cattle-derived assemblage E sequences in our investigated areas (JN162347) and the USA (AY655706, EF654682, AY228646). Subtype E-II (8.7%; 2/23) had the same nucleotide sequence as the isolate of G. duodenalis from an Australian sheep (GQ444447). Subtypes E-I and E-II appeared to have no differences in geographical distribution. The remaining five novel subtypes (E-III to E-VII) have never been reported before and might represent endemic genetic characterizations of assemblage E in the investigated areas. In addition to high polymorphism observed within assemblage E in sheep and goats at the tpi locus in the present and previous studies [29], intra-genotype variations of assemblage E were also described in the animals at the bg locus [14], [20], [29]. A high level of genetic diversity within assemblage E has also been reported in cattle based on the tpi gene [27], [33]. It is generally considered that assemblages A and B are infrequently detected in sheep and goats. However, there are exceptions appearing in a few studies of sheep and goat giardiasis, with assemblage A being found to be a common genotype besides assemblage E [14], [17], [18]. Even in an Australian study, assemblage A was found to be more prevalent than assemblage E in sheep [22]. More surprisingly, assemblage A isolates have been identified from Italian sheep with the absence of assemblages B and E [23]. For assemblage B, so far, there have only been four reports involved in sheep and goats, with three in sheep [3], [19], [21] and one in goats [34]. The low occurrence of assemblages A and B in sheep and goats as well as in cattle may be related to the predominance of assemblage E in these animals, for they have to compete with the more common assemblage E. In the present study, four assemblage A isolates (13.8%; 4/29), representing two subtypes, were detected from the G. duodenalis-positive specimens. Three of them were identified as subtype AI, showing 100% homology with each other as well as the subtype AI tpi gene sequences from humans (Table 5) and some animals [22], [27], [35], [36]. The remaining one isolate was a novel subtype of assemblage A, which was designated as subtype AIV based on the base variations compared to subtypes AI, AII and AIII, respectively (Table 2). The same sequences have been obtained from humans in Sweden and Western Sahara (Table 5), and cats in Japan [36]. Currently, three subtypes AI, AII and AIII constitute the overwhelming majority of assemblage A isolates, and all of them appear to have different host preferences. Subtype AI is mostly found in animals and occasionally in humans; subtype AII commonly infects humans and was sometimes seen in animals; subtype AIII circulated in wildlife, but it has been seen in a few humans based on the bg gene [5]. Two tpi gene sequences of assemblage B isolates in the present study had 100% homology with each other and was identical to those obtained from dairy cattle, rabbits and wastewater in the investigated areas [33], [37], [38]. The same sequence has never been reported before in human and animal cases in other countries or areas. This may be of characteristic geographical distributions.
Table 5

Homology analyses of sheep/goat-derived isolates of assemblages A and B with human-derived isolates.

CountryRefHostNo. of isolates characterizedLoci amplifiedAssemblage (subtype)Accession No.Accession No. of human-derived isolatesb (country)
Australia [22] Sheep26TPIA (AI)GQ444447EF688042-43(USA), EF688041(Puerto Rico), EF688040(Israel), EF688036(Egypt), EF688038-39(Peru), EF688031,34(Australia), GU564274-76(China), HQ836660(Malaysia)
Sheep1TPIAGQ444448No
Sheep1TPIAGQ444449No
Sheep1TPIAGQ444450No
Sheep1TPIAGQ444451No
unspecifiedunpublishedsheepunspecifiedGDHA (AI)JF958092AB569385(Japan), EU594662(Cuba), EF685702(USA), GQ502960(Uganda), GQ168944(Australia), GQ329674(Sweden), HM748043(Thailand), JF917089(Iran), JF918516 and JF918453(India)
Belgium [14] Sheep2BGA (AII)EU642896GU396696 and FJ009208(Poland), HM165227(Sweden)
[14] Goat6BGA (AII)EU642897No
USA [16] Sheep1SSU rDNAAAY655700a AY826204-05(Holland)
Italy [23] Sheep5GDHA (AI)M84604a No
BGA (AI)M36728a No
Spain [20] Sheep1BGA (AI)EU726988No
Norway [19] Sheep1BGBGQ337974No
ChinaThis studySheep1TPIA (AIV)JQ928710EU041756(Western Sahara), GQ329677-78(Sweden)
3TPIA (AI)JQ928711EF688031, 34(Australia), EF688036(Egypt), EF688038, 39 (Peru), EF688040(Israel), EF688041(Puerto Rico), EF688042-43(USA), J560569(France), GU564274-76(China), HQ836660(Malaysia)
2TPIBJQ928712No

Note:

Accession Nos indicating that sheep-derived isolates have 100% homology with the sequences of instead of their own.

All the human-derived isolates having 100% homology with sheep/goat-derived isolates of assemblages A and B.

Note: Accession Nos indicating that sheep-derived isolates have 100% homology with the sequences of instead of their own. All the human-derived isolates having 100% homology with sheep/goat-derived isolates of assemblages A and B. Although no human giardiasis cases were reported in the investigated areas, the molecular epidemiological data worldwide can help us to assess the possibility of zoonotic giardiasis caused by sheep and goats. To date, at least 52 sheep-/goat-derived isolates of assemblages A and B have been obtained based on tpi, gdh, bg and SSU rRNA genes. Among 14 representative sequences of assemblage A obtained from 49 isolates, six sequences show 100% homology with those derived from humans. Even in Australia and China, the same sequences of assemblage AI have been seen in both humans and sheep (Table 5). Thus, there might be the large possibility of cross-species transmission of assemblage AI between sheep and humans due to the similar genetic backgrounds of assemblage AI. However, what portion of human subtype AI infections attributable to zoonotic transmission is still unclear. The role that sheep and goats may play in the epidemiology of human giardiasis remains controversial. Some studies do not support sheep and goats as an important reservoir mainly based on the fact that G. duodenalis assemblage E is the predominant genotype in these animals in most countries and areas [15], [19], [29]. Up to date, few epidemiological studies have assessed the importance of zoonotic transmission of G. duodenalis. An assessment of zoonotic transmission had better come from the dynamics data of giardiasis between humans and animals in the same household or localized focus of endemicity. In conclusion, the findings above provide the first report on sheep and goat giardiasis in China. Percentages and genetic characteristics of G. duodenalis assemblages in Heilongjiang Province seem to be different from other countries or areas and may represent the endemicity of G. duodenalis. The fact that the sequences of subtypes AI and AIV in the present study have also been described in human-derived G. duodenalis isolates implies the sheep infected with assemblage A posed a serious threat to local inhabitants and are of public health importance. The unique finding of the tpi gene sequence of assemblage B in different hosts (cattle, rabbits and sheep) and environmental specimen (wastewater) in the investigated areas may reflect characteristic geographical distribution. The transmission dynamic of assemblages A and B, and the burden of human giardiasis caused by animals need to be assessed by systematic molecular epidemiological investigations of humans and animals in the future.
  38 in total

Review 1.  Update on Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in cattle.

Authors:  Merle E Olson; Ryan M O'Handley; Brenda J Ralston; Timothy A McAllister; R C Andrew Thompson
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2004-04

2.  Sheep may not be an important zoonotic reservoir for Cryptosporidium and Giardia parasites.

Authors:  Una M Ryan; Caroline Bath; Ian Robertson; Carolyn Read; Aileen Elliot; Linda McInnes; Rebecca Traub; Brown Besier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Occurrence of bovine giardiasis and endemic genetic characterization of Giardia duodenalis isolates in Heilongjiang Province, in the Northeast of China.

Authors:  Aiqin Liu; Xiaoyun Zhang; Longxian Zhang; Rongjun Wang; Xingchao Li; Jing Shu; Xiaoli Zhang; Yujuan Shen; Weizhe Zhang; Hong Ling
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Prevalence and molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis from sheep in central Italy.

Authors:  Annunziata Giangaspero; Barbara Paoletti; Raffaella Iorio; Donato Traversa
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 5.  Giardiasis as a re-emerging infectious disease and its zoonotic potential.

Authors:  R C Thompson
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.981

6.  Risk of giardiasis in Aucklanders: a case-control study.

Authors:  M Ekramul Hoque; Virginia T Hope; Tord Kjellström; Robert Scragg; Roy Lay-Yee
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Asymptomatic giardiasis and growth in young children; a longitudinal study in Salvador, Brazil.

Authors:  M S Prado; S Cairncross; A Strina; M L Barreto; A M Oliveira-Assis; S Rego
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis genotypes in pre-weaned dairy calves.

Authors:  James M Trout; Mónica Santín; Ellis Greiner; Ronald Fayer
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 2.738

9.  Children at risk of giardiasis in Auckland: a case-control analysis.

Authors:  M E Hoque; V T Hope; R Scragg; T Kjellström
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis.

Authors:  Irshad M Sulaiman; Ronald Fayer; Caryn Bern; Robert H Gilman; James M Trout; Peter M Schantz; Pradeep Das; Altaf A Lal; Lihua Xiao
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  19 in total

1.  Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy and native beef (Qinchuan) calves in Shaanxi province, northwestern China.

Authors:  X T Wang; R J Wang; G J Ren; Z Q Yu; L X Zhang; S Y Zhang; H Lu; X Q Peng; G H Zhao
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Occurrence and molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in sheep and goats reared under dairy husbandry systems in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tzanidakis; Smaragda Sotiraki; Edwin Claerebout; Amimul Ehsan; Nikolaos Voutzourakis; Despoina Kostopoulou; Casaert Stijn; Jozef Vercruysse; Thomas Geurden
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Genetic diversity of Giardia duodenalis: multilocus genotyping reveals zoonotic potential between clinical and environmental sources in a metropolitan region of Brazil.

Authors:  Mauricio Durigan; Aluana Gonçalves Abreu; Maria Imaculada Zucchi; Regina Maura Bueno Franco; Anete Pereira de Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Giardia duodenalis genetic assemblages and hosts.

Authors:  Martin F Heyworth
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  The presence of Giardia intestinalis in donkeys, Equus asinus, in China.

Authors:  Xiao-Xuan Zhang; Fu-Kai Zhang; Fa-Cai Li; Jun-Ling Hou; Wen-Bin Zheng; Shuai-Zhi Du; Quan Zhao; Xing-Quan Zhu
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium species and Giardia duodenalis in lambs in Oromia Special Zone, Central Ethiopia.

Authors:  Teklu Wegayehu; Md Robiul Karim; Junqiang Li; Haileeyesus Adamu; Berhanu Erko; Longxian Zhang; Getachew Tilahun
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Genetic analysis of the Gdh and Bg genes of animal-derived Giardia duodenalis isolates in Northeastern China and evaluation of zoonotic transmission potential.

Authors:  Aiqin Liu; Fengkun Yang; Yujuan Shen; Weizhe Zhang; Rongjun Wang; Wei Zhao; Longxian Zhang; Hong Ling; Jianping Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Henan, China.

Authors:  Haiyan Wang; Guanghui Zhao; Gongyi Chen; Fuchun Jian; Sumei Zhang; Chao Feng; Rongjun Wang; Jinfeng Zhu; Haiju Dong; Jun Hua; Ming Wang; Longxian Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Occurrence and multilocus genotyping of Giardia intestinalis assemblage C and D in farmed raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonoides, in China.

Authors:  Xiao-Xuan Zhang; Wen-Bin Zheng; Jian-Gang Ma; Qiu-Xia Yao; Yang Zou; Cai-Jia Bubu; Quan Zhao; Xing-Quan Zhu
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Prevalence and molecular characterization of Giardia intestinalis in racehorses from the Sichuan province of southwestern China.

Authors:  Lei Deng; Wei Li; Zhijun Zhong; Xuehan Liu; Yijun Chai; Xue Luo; Yuan Song; Wuyou Wang; Chao Gong; Xiangming Huang; Yanchun Hu; Hualin Fu; Min He; Ya Wang; Yue Zhang; Kongju Wu; Suizhong Cao; Guangneng Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.