| Literature DB >> 23028642 |
John Widger1, Mark R Oliver, Michele O'Connell, Fergus J Cameron, Sarath Ranganathan, Phil J Robinson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) are relatively insulinopenic and are at risk of diabetes, especially during times of stress. There is a paucity of data in the literature describing glucose tolerance during CF pulmonary exacerbations. We hypothesised that glucose tolerance would be worse during pulmonary exacerbations in children with CF than during clinical stability.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23028642 PMCID: PMC3441597 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of study subjects at recruitment.
|
|
|
|
| 14.5 (2.8) |
|
| 8F/3 M |
|
| 0.02 (0.77) |
|
| 5.7(5.2,6.7) |
|
| |
|
| 5 (45%) |
|
| 3 (27%) |
|
| 2 (18%) |
|
| 1 (9%) |
|
| |
|
| 5 (45%) |
|
| 2 (18%) |
|
| 2 (18%) |
|
| 2 (18%) |
Data on HbA1c, 2 hour glucose and BMI.
| Patient | HbA1c | 2hrg | BMI | BMIz |
| 1 | 5.6 | 9.3 | −1.2 | −1.1 |
| 2 | 5.4 | 5.5 | −0.42 | −0.25 |
| 3 | 5.2 | 6.2 | −0.09 | −02 |
| 4 | 5.2 | 7 | 0.58 | 0.63 |
| 5# | 6.1 | 12.6 | −0.75 | n/a |
| 6 | 5.8 | 13.6 | 0.41 | 0.02 |
| 7 | 6.6 | 15.5 | 0.78 | 0.63 |
| 8 | 5.2 | 10.9 | 0.52 | 0.04 |
| 9 | 5.7 | 8.4 | 1.17 | 1.23 |
| 10 | 5.6 | 6.8 | −1.01 | −0.35 |
| 11$ | 6.7 | 11.8 | 0.2 | n/a |
| Mean | 5.7 | 9.78 | −0.06 | 0.09 |
On admission.
At follow up.
HbA1c = Glycated Haemoglobin.
2hrg = 2 hour glucose.
BMI = Body mass index.
# Patient 5 died during admission.
$ Patient 11 was started on insulin and did not have a follow up OGTT.
Figure 1Change in 2-hour glucose measurements between admission and follow up (n = 9).
Only one patient had a change in glucose tolerance status (from IGT to NGT). NGT = Normal Glucose Tolerance; IGT = Impaired Glucose Tolerance; CFRD = Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes.
Figure 2Glucose and insulin curves from 9 patients who had paired OGTTs.
Mean (± SE) insulin and glucose levels are reported for each time point during OGTTS at admission and follow up. Area under the curve for glucose (p = 0.18) and insulin (p = 0.26) did not differ between admission and follow up.
Figure 3A boxplot of %FEV1 for each subject at each study time point.
Transverse line is the mean and whiskers are maximum and minimum. There was a decline in mean %FEV1 from baseline to admission in all patients (mean change 10.9%, p<0.001).