| Literature DB >> 23028563 |
Catarina Magalhães1, Mark I Stevens, S Craig Cary, Becky A Ball, Bryan C Storey, Diana H Wall, Roman Türk, Ulrike Ruprecht.
Abstract
Multitrophic communities that maintain the functionality of the extreme Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems, while the simplest of any natural community, are still challenging our knowledge about the limits to life on earth. In this study, we describe and interpret the linkage between the diversity of different trophic level communities to the geological morphology and soil geochemistry in the remote Transantarctic Mountains (Darwin Mountains, 80°S). We examined the distribution and diversity of biota (bacteria, cyanobacteria, lichens,Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23028563 PMCID: PMC3446939 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of Darwin-Hatherton Glacier region.
Sampling sites were located around Lake Wellman (LW samples), Junction Spur (S samples) and on Dusky Ridge (DR1 sample).
Geochemical properties of soil samples from all sampling sites (n.a. = not available).
| Moisture | TN | TC | OC | pH | TC/TN | Cond. | Altitude | Drift ages | |
| ID | % (g/g) | mg/g soil | µS/cm | (m) | |||||
|
| 0.8 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.22 | 8.69 | 41.72 | 124.6 | 850 | Hatherton |
|
| 0.7 | 0.11 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 8.19 | 5.89 | 166.4 | 852 | Hatherton |
|
| n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 852 | Hatherton |
|
| n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 885 | Britannia |
|
| 3.8 | 3.51 | 0.95 | 0.31 | 7.52 | 0.27 | 10368.9 | 874 | Hatherton |
|
| 1.1 | 0.08 | 0.71 | 0.14 | 8.45 | 9.02 | 282.8 | 892 | Hatherton |
|
| 1.2 | 0.32 | 1.52 | 0.50 | 7.93 | 4.76 | 11.5 | 929 | Britannia |
|
| 4.4 | 2.88 | 0.73 | 0.31 | 8.00 | 0.26 | 7900.0 | 939 | Britannia |
|
| 1.9 | 0.75 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 8.03 | 0.28 | 2260.2 | 940 | Britannia |
|
| 2.2 | 0.74 | 1.117 | 0.59 | 7.61 | 1.59 | 2474.4 | 941 | Britannia |
|
| n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 944 | Hatherton |
|
| 4.5 | 3.99 | 1.73 | 0.59 | 7.73 | 0.43 | 7915.0 | 955 | Britannia |
|
| 0.9 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 7.91 | 1.04 | 910.5 | 987 | Britannia |
|
| 11.3 | 3.02 | 1.19 | 0.31 | 8.32 | 0.40 | 9394.4 | 993 | Britannia |
|
| 0.9 | 0.73 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 7.75 | 0.21 | 1847.8 | 1025 | Britannia |
|
| 1.8 | 1.40 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 7.8 | 0.15 | 4316.8 | 1073 | Britannia |
|
| 1.4 | 1.31 | 0.39 | 0.15 | 7.94 | 0.30 | 2967.1 | 1101 | Britannia |
|
| 1.9 | 1.19 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 7.83 | 0.26 | 4381.1 | 1104 | Danum |
|
| 5.6 | 2.54 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 7.53 | 0.16 | 5409.4 | 1147 | Isca |
|
| 4.1 | 1.18 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 7.93 | 0.17 | 4628.5 | 1148 | Isca |
|
| 2.0 | 1.48 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 7.63 | 0.11 | 3492.0 | 1150 | Isca |
|
| 1.7 | 1.51 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 7.75 | 0.09 | 3603.5 | 1161 | Isca |
|
| 3.4 | 0.41 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 7.97 | 0.58 | 2057.7 | 1230 | Isca |
|
| 2.9 | 0.08 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 7.80 | 6.56 | 280.0 | 1371 | Isca |
|
| n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 1501 | Isca |
|
| 3.3 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 8.33 | 7.23 | 29.7 | 908 | Hatherton |
|
| 2.3 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 7.92 | 17.66 | 12.5 | 927 | Hatherton |
|
| 6.3 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 7.87 | 34.84 | 75.1 | 910 | Hatherton |
|
| 6.4 | 0.16 | 1.38 | 0.85 | 8.92 | 8.78 | 162.7 | 845 | Hatherton |
|
| 2.2 | 1.24 | 14.83 | 14.29 | 7.34 | 11.95 | 1097.9 | 968 | Hatherton |
Drift ages modified after Bockheim et al. [30].
Figure 2Geomorphological map of Lake Wellman area.
Lake Wellman (LW) sampling sites were projected on the main drift ages modified after Bockheim et al. [30].
Figure 3Hierarchical clustering of biota richness (A) and spatial variation of soil conductivity (B).
Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed based on group average linking of Euclidean distances calculated for fourth root richness data of bacteria, cyanobacteria, invertebrates, lichens and algae presented at Table S2. Spatial variation of conductivity was plotted for the samples analysed by hierarchical clustering analysis; dashed lines represent mean conductivity values for the samples grouped within each cluster generated.
Figure 4Redundancy analysis ordination (RDA) plot for the biogeochemical/geographic variables and richness of the different groups of organisms analyzed.
Environmental variables included in the analysis (Table 1; Table S1) were found to contribute significantly to the explanation of different richness distributions. Richness values for bacteria, cyanobacteria, invertebrates, lichens and algae are represented as circles of diameter scaled linearly to the magnitude of the value.