BACKGROUND: Although dialysis after kidney transplant failure (TF) is common, the outcomes of these patients remain unclear. We compared outcomes of TF patients with transplant-naïve (TN) patients wait-listed for kidney transplantation. METHODS: We used data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), including laboratory markers and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Mortality and hospitalization of participants with one prior TF versus TN patients were compared using the Cox regression analysis. HR-QOL physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) were examined using linear mixed models, and clinical practices were compared using logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with TN patients (n = 2806), TF patients (n = 1856) were younger (48 versus 51 years, P = 0.003), less likely to be diabetic (18 versus 27%, P < 0.0001) and to use a permanent surgical vascular access {adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-1.03], P = 0.10}, particularly within the first 3 months after TF [AOR 0.45 (0.32-0.62), P < 0.0001]. TF patients also had lower PCS [mean difference -2.56 (-3.36, -1.75), P < 0.0001] but not MCS [-0.42 (-1.34, 0.50), P = 0.37]. All-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.32 (95% CI: 1.05-1.66), P = 0.02], especially infection-related [AHR 2.45 (95% CI: 1.36-4.41), P = 0.01], was higher among TF patients. CONCLUSIONS: TF patients have reduced QOL and higher mortality, particularly due to infections, than TN patients. Interventions to optimize care before and after starting dialysis remain to be identified and applied in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Although dialysis after kidney transplant failure (TF) is common, the outcomes of these patients remain unclear. We compared outcomes of TF patients with transplant-naïve (TN) patients wait-listed for kidney transplantation. METHODS: We used data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), including laboratory markers and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Mortality and hospitalization of participants with one prior TF versus TNpatients were compared using the Cox regression analysis. HR-QOL physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) were examined using linear mixed models, and clinical practices were compared using logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with TNpatients (n = 2806), TF patients (n = 1856) were younger (48 versus 51 years, P = 0.003), less likely to be diabetic (18 versus 27%, P < 0.0001) and to use a permanent surgical vascular access {adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-1.03], P = 0.10}, particularly within the first 3 months after TF [AOR 0.45 (0.32-0.62), P < 0.0001]. TF patients also had lower PCS [mean difference -2.56 (-3.36, -1.75), P < 0.0001] but not MCS [-0.42 (-1.34, 0.50), P = 0.37]. All-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.32 (95% CI: 1.05-1.66), P = 0.02], especially infection-related [AHR 2.45 (95% CI: 1.36-4.41), P = 0.01], was higher among TF patients. CONCLUSIONS: TF patients have reduced QOL and higher mortality, particularly due to infections, than TNpatients. Interventions to optimize care before and after starting dialysis remain to be identified and applied in clinical practice.
Authors: Martin P Gallagher; Patrick J Kelly; Meg Jardine; Vlado Perkovic; Alan Cass; Jonathan C Craig; Josette Eris; Angela C Webster Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: R A Wolfe; V B Ashby; E L Milford; A O Ojo; R E Ettenger; L Y Agodoa; P J Held; F K Port Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-12-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronald L Pisoni; Brenda W Gillespie; David M Dickinson; Kenneth Chen; Michael H Kutner; Robert A Wolfe Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Juan M López-Gómez; Isabel Pérez-Flores; Rosa Jofré; Diana Carretero; Patrocinio Rodríguez-Benitez; Maite Villaverde; Rafael Pérez-García; George M Nassar; Enrique Niembro; Juan Carlos Ayus Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Matthew Kadatz; John S Gill; Jagbir Gill; Richard N Formica; Scott Klarenbach Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Kenneth J Woodside; Sarah Bell; Purna Mukhopadhyay; Kaitlyn J Repeck; Ian T Robinson; Ashley R Eckard; Sudipta Dasmunshi; Brett W Plattner; Jeffrey Pearson; Douglas E Schaubel; Ronald L Pisoni; Rajiv Saran Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Micah R Chan; Bharvi Oza-Gajera; Kevin Chapla; Arjang X Djamali; Brenda L Muth; Jennifer Turk; Maureen Wakeen; Alexander S Yevzlin; Brad C Astor Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: S V Bontha; D G Maluf; K J Archer; C I Dumur; M G Dozmorov; A L King; E Akalin; T F Mueller; L Gallon; V R Mas Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2017-07-08 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Naoka Murakami; Nathan D Baggett; Margaret L Schwarze; Keren Ladin; Andrew M Courtwright; Hilary J Goldberg; Eric P Nolley; Nelia Jain; Michael Landzberg; Kirsten Wentlandt; Jennifer C Lai; Myrick C Shinall; Nneka N Ufere; Christopher A Jones; Joshua R Lakin Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 2.947