Literature DB >> 31704739

Economic Evaluation of Extending Medicare Immunosuppressive Drug Coverage for Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Current Era.

Matthew Kadatz1, John S Gill2,3,4, Jagbir Gill1,3, Richard N Formica5, Scott Klarenbach6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients must take immunosuppressant drugs to prevent rejection and maintain transplant function. Medicare coverage of immunosuppressant drugs for kidney transplant recipients ceases 36 months after transplantation, potentially increasing the risk of transplant failure. A contemporary economic analysis of extending Medicare coverage for the duration of transplant survival using current costs of immunosuppressant medications in the era of generic equivalents may inform immunosuppressant drug policy.
METHODS: A Markov model was used to determine the incremental cost and effectiveness of extending Medicare coverage for immunosuppressive drugs over the duration of transplant survival, compared with the current policy of 36-month coverage, from the perspective of the Medicare payer. The expected improvement in transplant survival by extending immunosuppressive drug coverage was estimated from a cohort of privately insured transplant recipients who receive lifelong immunosuppressant drug coverage compared with a cohort of Medicare-insured transplant recipients, using multivariable survival analysis.
RESULTS: Extension of immunosuppression Medicare coverage for kidney transplant recipients led to lower costs of -$3077 and 0.37 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient. When the improvement in transplant survival associated with extending immunosuppressant coverage was reduced to 50% of that observed in privately insured patients, the strategy of extending drug coverage had an incremental cost-utility ratio of $51,694 per QALY gained. In a threshold analysis, the extension of immunosuppression coverage was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, $50,000, and $0 per QALY if it results in a decrease in risk of transplant failure of 5.5%, 7.8%, and 13.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Extending immunosuppressive drug coverage under Medicare from the current 36 months to the duration of transplant survival will result in better patient outcomes and cost-savings, and remains cost-effective if only a fraction of anticipated benefit is realized.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Economic Analysis; Medicare; kidney transplantation; transplant outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31704739      PMCID: PMC6934999          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2019070646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  23 in total

1.  Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes.

Authors:  M Tonelli; N Wiebe; G Knoll; A Bello; S Browne; D Jadhav; S Klarenbach; J Gill
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Unemployment in inner-city renal transplant recipients: predictive and sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  M S Markell; A DiBenedetto; V Maursky; N Sumrani; J H Hong; D A Distant; A M Miles; B G Sommer; E A Friedman
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Joshua T Cohen; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Economics.

Authors:  M A Schnitzler; M A Skeans; D A Axelrod; K L Lentine; H B Randall; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Secular Trends in the Cost of Immunosuppressants after Solid Organ Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Margaret E Helmuth; Qian Liu; Marc N Turenne; Jeong M Park; Murewa Oguntimein; Sarah K Dutcher; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Pratima Sharma; Jarcy Zee; Alan B Leichtman; Abigail R Smith
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Cost-effectiveness of extending Medicare coverage of immunosuppressive medications to the life of a kidney transplant.

Authors:  Eugene F Yen; Karen Hardinger; Daniel C Brennan; Robert S Woodward; Niraj M Desai; Jeffrey S Crippin; Brian F Gage; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Disability following kidney transplantation: the link to medication coverage.

Authors:  D P Slakey; M Rosner
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.863

8.  Socioeconomic Status and Kidney Transplant Outcomes in a Universal Healthcare System: A Population-based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kyla L Naylor; Gregory A Knoll; Salimah Z Shariff; Eric McArthur; Amit X Garg; Carl Van Walraven; Peter C Austin; Megan K McCallum; Robert R Quinn; Vivian S Tan; S Joseph Kim
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  Gillian D Sanders; Peter J Neumann; Anirban Basu; Dan W Brock; David Feeny; Murray Krahn; Karen M Kuntz; David O Meltzer; Douglas K Owens; Lisa A Prosser; Joshua A Salomon; Mark J Sculpher; Thomas A Trikalinos; Louise B Russell; Joanna E Siegel; Theodore G Ganiats
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments.

Authors:  Melanie Wyld; Rachael Lisa Morton; Andrew Hayen; Kirsten Howard; Angela Claire Webster
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Kidney Transplantation Decision Modelling Studies.

Authors:  Mohsen Yaghoubi; Sonya Cressman; Louisa Edwards; Steven Shechter; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Paul Keown; Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Economic analysis of screening for subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation using protocol biopsies and noninvasive biomarkers.

Authors:  Chethan M Puttarajappa; Rajil B Mehta; Mark S Roberts; Kenneth J Smith; Sundaram Hariharan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Passage of the Comprehensive Immunosuppressive Drug Coverage for Kidney Transplant Patients Act-a Chance to Celebrate and Reflect.

Authors:  John S Gill; Richard N Formica; Barbara Murphy
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  After 20 Years of Advocacy, Comprehensive Immunosuppressive Drug Coverage for Kidney Transplant Patients Finally Become Law.

Authors:  Macey L Levan; David J Reich; Dorry L L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.385

Review 5.  Policy in pediatric nephrology: successes, failures, and the impact on disparities.

Authors:  Jill R Krissberg; Scott M Sutherland; Lisa J Chamberlain; Paul H Wise
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Association of Race and Risk of Graft Loss among Kidney Transplant Recipients in the US Military Health System.

Authors:  Crystal J Forman; Christina M Yuan; Rahul M Jindal; Lawrence Y Agodoa; Kevin C Abbott; Robert Nee
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 8.237

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.