Literature DB >> 23027363

Comparative analysis of 3 different construct systems for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: stand-alone cage, iliac graft plus plate augmentation, and cage plus plating.

Chang-Hyun Lee1, Seung-Jae Hyun, Min Jeong Kim, Jin S Yeom, Wook Ha Kim, Ki-Jeong Kim, Tae-Ahn Jahng, Hyun-Jib Kim, Sang Hoon Yoon.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort-nested longitudinal study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiologic and clinically functional outcomes after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using 3 different fusion construct systems applying an accurate and reliable methodology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is an established procedure that uses 3 different fusion construct systems: cage alone (CA), iliac tricortical bone block with plate (IP), and cage with plate construct (CP). The outcome of a previous study is quite different and did not correlate with experimental studies.
METHODS: ACDF was performed on 158 patients (90 male and 68 female), who were followed up for >12 months. The patients were divided into the following 3 treatment groups: CA, IP, and CP. Factors related to outcome were also evaluated. Fusion rate, subsidence rate, and cervical angles were used to measure radiologic outcome. The Odom criteria and the visual analog scale were used to evaluate the clinical outcome.
RESULTS: The fusion rate was higher for patients in the IP (87.1%) and CP (79.5%) groups than for those in the CA group (63.2%) after 12 months of follow-up (P=0.019). The subsidence rate was lower for patients in the IP (28.1%) and CP (38.5%) groups than for those in the CA group (58.6%) (P=0.010). Subsidence occurred for the anterior height regardless of constructs. Radiating arm pain showed greater relief in the CP group than in the CA group (P=0.015). It improved more in the CP group than in the IP group, but the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.388). Other clinical outcomes did not show significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The trend of excellent radiologic outcome was observed for IP≥CP>CA. Plating may play a key role in the support of anterior height. As a result, plating prevents segmental kyphosis and subsidence and promotes bone fusion. Although the overall clinical outcomes were not different among the 3 groups, except for arm pain, more favorable trends regarding clinical outcome were observed for CP≥IP>CA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23027363     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318274148e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  25 in total

1.  The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study.

Authors:  Jarle Sundseth; Oddrun Anita Fredriksli; Frode Kolstad; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Are Hugo Pripp; Hege Andresen; Erling Myrseth; Kay Müller; Øystein P Nygaard; John-Anker Zwart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  I Noordhoek; M T Koning; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Osamu Nemoto; Akira Kitada; Satoko Naitou; Atsuko Tachibana; Yuya Ito; Akira Fujikawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-05

4.  Influence of cervical bone mineral density on cage subsidence in patients following stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Martin Dostal; Johann Scharf; Christel Weiß; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Sheng Huang; Ming Gong; Liangping Li; Ting Yu; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-04

6.  Cage deviation in the subaxial cervical spine in relation to implant position in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Klaus Christian Mende; Sven Oliver Eicker; Friedrich Weber
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion can restore cervical sagittal alignment in degenerative cervical disease.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Byung-Wan Choi; JeaSeok Park; Sebastien Pesenti; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-01-25

8.  [Effect of zero-profile and self-locking intervertebral cage and plate-cage construct on maintenance of cervical curvature after anterior cervical surgery].

Authors:  Junsong Yang; Peng Liu; Tuanjiang Liu; Jijun Liu; Hao Chen; Xiaozhou Xu; Jianan Zhang; Zhengping Zhang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-15

9.  A radiographic follow-up study of stand-alone-cage and graft-plate constructs for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Joseph F Baker; Jaime Gomez; Kartik Shenoy; Sarah Kim; Afshin Razi; Yong Kim
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

10.  Clinical Outcomes between Stand-Alone Zero-Profile Spacers and Cervical Plate with Cage Fixation for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis of 166 Patients.

Authors:  Samuel Sommaruga; Joaquin Camara-Quintana; Kishan Patel; Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore; Granit Molliqaj; Shreyas Panchagnula; Michael Robinson; Justin Virojanapa; Xin Sun; Fjodor Melnikov; Luis Kolb; Karl Schaller; Khalid Abbed; Joseph Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.