Literature DB >> 23026623

Comparative analysis of the complications of 5347 endomyocardial biopsies applied to patients after heart transplantation and with cardiomyopathies: a single-center study.

A I Fiorelli1, L Benvenuti, V Aielo, A Q Coelho, J F Palazzo, R Rossener, A C P Barreto, C Mady, F Bacal, E Bocchi, N A G Stolf.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) plays an important role in allograft surveillance to screen an acute rejection episode after heart transplantation (HT), to diagnose an unknown cause of cardiomyopathies (CMP) or to reveal a cardiac tumor. However, the procedure is not risk free.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this research was to describe our experience with EMB during the last 33 years comparing surgical risk between HT versus no-HT patients.
METHOD: We analyzed retrospectively the data of 5347 EMBs performed from 1978 to 2011 (33 years). For surveillance of acute rejection episodes after HT we performed 3564 (66.7%), whereas 1777 (33.2%) for CMP diagnosis, and 6 (1.0%) for cardiac tumor identification.
RESULTS: The main complications due to EMB were divided into 2 groups to facilitate analysis: major complications associated with potential death risk, and minor complications. The variables that showed a significant difference in the HT group were as follows: tricuspid injury (.0490) and coronary fistula (.0000). Among the no-HT cohort they were insufficient fragment (.0000), major complications (.0000) and total complications (.0000).
CONCLUSIONS: EMB can be accomplished with a low risk of complications and high effectiveness to diagnose CMP and rejection after HT. However, the risk is great among patients with CMP due to their anatomic characteristics. Children also constitute a risk group for EMB due to their small size in addition to the heart disease. The risk of injury to the tricuspid valve was higher among the HT group.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23026623     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

1.  Long-term surveillance biopsy: Is it necessary after pediatric heart transplant?

Authors:  David M Peng; Victoria Y Ding; Seth A Hollander; Tigran Khalapyan; John C Dykes; David N Rosenthal; Christopher S Almond; Charlotte Sakarovitch; Manisha Desai; Doff B McElhinney
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  Reducing Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy in Pediatric Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Gossett; Christina L Sammet; Anya Agrawal; Karen Rychlik; David F Wax
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Endomyocardial biopsy via the femoral access - still safe and valuable diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Sylwia Sławek; Aleksander Araszkiewicz; Agnieszka Gaczkowska; Justyna Koszarska; Damian Celiński; Marek Grygier; Maciej Lesiak; Stefan Grajek
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Use of speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived strain and systolic strain rate measurements to predict rejection in transplant hearts with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Andrew S Tseng; Umama S Gorsi; Sergio Barros-Gomes; Fletcher A Miller; Patricia A Pellikka; Alfredo L Clavell; Hector R Villarraga
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Mitral Valve Regurgitation: A Severe Complication following Left Ventricular Biopsy 15 Years after Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Marcel Vollroth; Joerg Seeburger; Philipp Kiefer; Jens Garbade; Friedrich W Mohr; Markus J Barten
Journal:  Case Rep Transplant       Date:  2013-03-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.