| Literature DB >> 23025571 |
Taryn P Stewart1, Xia Mao, Maha N Aqqad, Deon Uffort, Kristy D Dillon, Arnold M Saxton, Jung Han Kim.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously established a congenic mouse strain with TALLYHO/Jng (TH) donor segment on chromosome 6 in a C57BL/6 (B6) background that harbors an obesity quantitative trait locus, tabw2. The B6.TH-tabw2 congenic mice developed increased adiposity that became exacerbated upon feeding a high fat-high sucrose (HFS) diet. To fine map the tabw2, in this study we generated and characterized subcongenic lines with smaller TH donor segments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23025571 PMCID: PMC3519667 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1B6.TH-congenic and subcongenic intervals at the locus on mouse chromosome 6. SSLP primers shown at the top were used to allelotype the congenic interval. The open and filled boxes represent a B6 and TH allele, respectively. Mean fat pad weights (g) are listed for each group under two diets for comparison (detailed phenotypic data are presented in Table 1).
Body and fat pad weights of B6.TH-congenic, subcongenic, and B6-homozygous control mice on chow and high fat-high sucrose diets (HFS) (males)
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 0 | 28.7 ± 0.4a (n = 15) | 29.6 ± 0.7d (n = 17) | 0.81 ± 0.06c (n = 15) | 1.77 ± 0.27c (n = 17) |
| 140.1 | 112.3 | 28.4 ± 0.5ab (n = 13) | 36.9 ± 1.1a (n = 7) | 1.15 ± 0.07a (n = 13) | 5.22 ± 0.42a (n = 7) | |
| Line A | 57.9 | 39.9 | 27.4 ± 0.4bc (n = 19) | 29.8 ± 0.9cd (n = 11) | 0.85 ± 0.06bc (n = 19) | 2.87 ± 0.33b (n = 11) |
| Line B | 92.5 | 57.2 | 27.2 ± 0.5bc (n = 11) | 31.3 ± 0.8bcd (n = 14) | 1.16 ± 0.07a (n = 11) | 2.74 ± 0.30b (n = 14) |
| Line C | 45.1 | 30.7 | 26.9 ± 0.3c (n = 29) | 32.2 ± 0.6b (n = 28) | 0.99 ± 0.05ab (n = 29) | 2.70 ± 0.21b (n = 28) |
| Line D | 10.8 | 1.4 | 28.5 ± 0.3a (n = 33) | 31.7 ± 0.5bc (n = 40) | 0.95 ± 0.04bc (n = 33) | 2.49 ± 0.18b (n = 40) |
| 0.0007 | <0.0001 | 0.0003 | <0.0001 | |||
The maximal TH interval retained is marked by the most proximal and distal primers with known B6 homozygous genotypes for a given donor region. The minimal TH interval retained is marked by the most proximal and distal primers with known TH homozygous genotypes for a given donor region. Fat pad weight is the sum of five fat pad weights (inguinal, epididymal, mesenteric, retroperitoneal including perirenal, and subscapular). Data are means ± SEM. Group means labeled with different letters are significantly different within a diet (P < 0.05)
Energy expenditure (heat production), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), locomotor activity (ambulatory count/day), and food intake of B6.TH-congenic, subcongenic, and B6-homozygous control mice on chow and HFS diets over a 24 hour period (males)
| Control (n = 10) | 0.4879 ± 0.0117ab | 0.918 ± 0.007a | 19766 ± 1668a | n.d. |
| 0.4880 ± 0.0185abc | 0.916 ± 0.012a | 15163 ± 2638ab | n.d. | |
| Line A (n = 10) | 0.4691 ± 0.0117bc | 0.907 ± 0.007a | 18182 ± 1668ab | n.d. |
| Line B (n = 8) | 0.4479 ± 0.0131c | 0.916 ± 0.008a | 13994 ± 1865b | n.d. |
| Line C (n = 9) | 0.4556 ± 0.0123bc | 0.923 ± 0.008a | 19173 ± 1758a | n.d. |
| Line D (n = 14) | 0.5028 ± 0.0099a | 0.925 ± 0.006a | 18796 ± 1410a | n.d. |
| 0.0081 | 0.5653 | 0.1850 | | |
| Control (n = 12) | 0.5541 ± 0.0107a | 0.899 ± 0.007a | 24571 ± 1523a | 15.06 ± 0.52b |
| 0.5713 ± 0.0214a | 0.906 ± 0.014a | 15962 ± 3046bc | 18.99 ± 1.04a | |
| Line A (n = 11) | 0.5305 ± 0.0112a | 0.866 ± 0.007b | 14741 ± 1591c | 12.87 ± 0.54c |
| Line B (n = 8) | 0.5398 ± 0.0131a | 0.909 ± 0.008a | 16928 ± 1865bc | 16.18 ± 0.63b |
| Line C (n = 18) | 0.5377 ± 0.0087a | 0.899 ± 0.006a | 17188 ± 1243bc | 15.61 ± 0.42b |
| Line D (n = 23) | 0.5497 ± 0.0077a | 0.890 ± 0.005a | 19463 ± 1100b | 15.20 ± 0.37b |
| 0.4033 | 0.0014 | 0.0004 | <0.0001 | |
Data are means ± SEM. Group means labeled with different letters are significantly different within a diet (P < 0.05).ND no data.
Diet composition of chow and high fat-high sucrose diets (HFS)
| Protein | | | 23.9 | 28.5 | | 18.5 | 16.8 | |
| Carbohydrate | | | 48.7 | 58.0 | | 56.7 | 51.4 | |
| Fat | | | 5.0 | 13.5 | | 15.6 | 31.8 | |
| | | Total | | 100.0 | | | 100.0 | |
| | | kcal/gm | 3.36 | | | 4.41 | | |
| | | | ||||||
| Arginine,% | 1.41 | 0.55 | Linolenic Acid,% | 0.10 | 0.218 | Zinc, ppm | 79 | 32 |
| Cystine,% | 0.31 | 0.11 | Other omega-3 Fatty Acids,% | 0.19 | | Manganese, ppm | 70 | 65 |
| Glycine,% | 1.21 | 0.27 | Total Saturated Fatty Acids,% | 1.56 | 4.02 | Copper, ppm | 13 | 6.5 |
| Histidine,% | 0.57 | 0.42 | Total Monounsaturated Fatty Acids,% | 1.60 | 4.04 | Cobalt, ppm | 0.9 | |
| Isoleucine,% | 1.14 | 0.69 | Fiber (crude),% | 5.1 | | Iodine, ppm | 1 | 0.2 |
| Leucine,% | 1.83 | 1.44 | Cellulose, BW200,% | | 2.8 | Chromium, ppm | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Lysine,% | 1.41 | 1.20 | Starch,% | 31.9 | 20.6 | Selenium, ppm | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Methionine,% | 0.67 | 0.79 | Glucose,% | 0.22 | 42 | Carotene, ppm | 2.3 | |
| Phenylalanine,% | 1.04 | 0.77 | Fructose,% | 0.3 | 14 | Vitamin K, ppm | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| Tyrosine,% | 0.71 | 0.83 | Sucrose,% | 3.7 | 28.8 | Thiamin, ppm | 16 | 6.3 |
| Threonine,% | 0.91 | 0.66 | Lactose,% | 2.01 | | Riboflavin, ppm | 4.5 | 7.3 |
| Tryptophan,% | 0.29 | 0.19 | Calcium,% | 0.95 | 0.77 | Niacin, ppm | 120 | 31 |
| Valine,% | 1.17 | 0.85 | Phosphorus,% | 0.66 | 1.02 | Pantothenic Acid, ppm | 24 | 17 |
| Serine,% | 1.19 | 0.91 | Phosphorus (non-phytate),% | 0.39 | | Choline, ppm | 2250 | 788 |
| Aspartic Acid,% | 2.81 | 1.11 | Potassium,% | 1.18 | 0.54 | Folic Acid, ppm | 7.1 | 2.1 |
| Glutamic Acid,% | 4.37 | 3.48 | Magnesium,% | 0.21 | 0.05 | Pyridoxine, ppm | 6 | 7.4 |
| Alanine,% | 1.43 | 0.46 | Sulfur,% | 0.36 | 0.04 | Biotin, ppm | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Proline,% | 1.49 | 1.62 | Sodium,% | 0.4 | 0.35 | B12, mcg/kg | 50 | 10.4 |
| Taurine,% | 0.02 | | Chlorine,% | 0.67 | 0.17 | Vitamin A, IU/gm | 15 | 4.2 |
| Cholesterol, ppm | 200 | | Fluorine, ppm | 16 | | Vitamin D, IU/gm | 4.5 | 1.0 |
| Linoleic Acid,% | 1.22 | 6.9 | Iron, ppm | 270 | 42 | Vitamin E, IU/kg | 42 | 52 |