Literature DB >> 23025466

Clinical accuracy for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: evaluation of 23 possible combinations of antiphospholipid antibody specificities.

S Sciascia1, V Murru, G Sanna, D Roccatello, M A Khamashta, M L Bertolaccini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) specificities both individually and/or in combination, in a wide cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in an attempt to identify a panel of tests that may provide the best accuracy for diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 230 patients (218 women, mean age 42.7 ± 11.9 years, mean disease duration 12.2 ± 8.7 years), all fulfilling the 1982 criteria for SLE. All patients were tested for lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-β(2) glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI), solid phase anti-prothrombin (aPT), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT), and anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE) antibodies. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy for each combination of tests was assessed by ROC and their area under the curve analysis as well as by the Youden's index (YI).
RESULTS: Testing for six aPL derived 23 possible combinations of results. Among them, LA + anti-β(2)GPI + aPS/PT had the best diagnostic accuracy for APS as a whole and individually for both thrombosis and pregnancy loss (AUC 0.712, OR 3.73 [95% CI 1.82-5.38], P = 0.0001, YI = 0.32 and AUC 0.709, OR 3.75 [95% CI 2.13-6.62], P = 0.0001, YI = 0.37 and AUC 0.677, OR 4.82 [95% CI 2.17-10.72], P = 0.0007, YI = 0.38, respectively) and the best specificity when compared with all the other obtainable combination of tests. Triple positivity for LA + anti-β(2)GPI + aPS/PT was more strongly associated with clinical events (thrombosis and/or PL) when compared with double or single positivity (OR 23.2 [95% CI 2.57-46.2] vs. OR 7.3 [95% CI 2.21-25.97], OR 5.7 [95% CI 2.12-17.01] or OR 3.11 [95% CI 1.56-7.8] for single positivity for LA, aPS/PT and anti-β(2)GPI, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Combining LA, anti-β(2)GPI and aPS/PT improves the diagnostic power and helps in stratifying the risk for each patient, according to their aPL profile.
© 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23025466     DOI: 10.1111/jth.12014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  25 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Risk Assessment in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Current Landscape and Emerging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Shruti Chaturvedi; Keith R McCrae
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Clinical features of new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus during pregnancy in Central China: a retrospective study of 68 pregnancies.

Authors:  Xiaodan He; Dongbin Jiang; Zhenbo Wang; Yao Li; Jingjing Wang; Dalin Xu; Jianqiang Chen; Xiaokang Liu; Guanmin Gao
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  New tests to detect antiphospholipid antibodies: antiprothrombin (aPT) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies.

Authors:  Savino Sciascia; Munther A Khamashta; Maria Laura Bertolaccini
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent thrombosis after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Sameer Parpia; Frederick A Spencer; Trevor Baglin; Scott M Stevens; Kenneth A Bauer; Steven R Lentz; Craig M Kessler; James D Douketis; Stephan Moll; Scott Kaatz; Sam Schulman; Jean M Connors; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Luciana Spadafora; Vinai Bhagirath; Patricia C Liaw; Jeffrey I Weitz; Jim A Julian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Laboratory evaluation of anti-phospholipid syndrome: a preliminary prospective study of phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in an at-risk patient cohort.

Authors:  N M Heikal; T D Jaskowski; E Malmberg; G Lakos; D W Branch; A E Tebo
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  How to Identify High-Risk APS Patients: Clinical Utility and Predictive Values of Validated Scores.

Authors:  Kenji Oku; Olga Amengual; Shinsuke Yasuda; Tatsuya Atsumi
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Diagnostic value of antibodies to phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex for antiphospholipid syndrome in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Chun Li; Na Liu; Xin Yang; R L Jia; Rong Mu; Yin Su; Z G Li
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Presence of antiphospholipid antibody is a risk factor in thrombotic events in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome or relevant diseases.

Authors:  Koji Habe; Hideo Wada; Takeshi Matsumoto; Kohshi Ohishi; Makoto Ikejiri; Kimiko Matsubara; Tatsuhiko Morioka; Yuki Kamimoto; Tomoaki Ikeda; Naoyuki Katayama; Tsutomu Nobori; Hitoshi Mizutani
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Renal involvement in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Savino Sciascia; Maria José Cuadrado; Munther Khamashta; Dario Roccatello
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 28.314

10.  Antiphospholipid patterns predict risk of thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Selcan Demir; Jessica Li; Laurence S Magder; Michelle Petri
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.