Literature DB >> 23024245

Trends in the use and advertising of discount versus premium snuff.

David S Timberlake1, Cornelia Pechmann.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Conwood Company, a major producer of discount moist snuff, was awarded a $1 billion antitrust settlement in the year 2000 against its leading competitor, the U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company. The objective of this study was to examine the trends in use and advertising of discount versus premium snuff since the Conwood settlement, a topic seldom addressed in the tobacco control literature.
METHODS: 2 sources of data were analyzed in 2011: (a) male snuff users from the 2002-2009 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (N = 13,172) and (b) total advertisements of moist snuff identified from over 350 consumer magazines dated 2005-2009 (N = 861). For the survey data, demographic and tobacco-related measures were assessed as predictors of use of discount versus premium snuff in logistic regression models. For the advertising data, associations were examined between the snuff category and nicotine content, magazine youth readership, and year of magazine publication.
RESULTS: The prevalence of discount and premium snuff use among males increased and decreased, respectively, from 2002 to 2009. Significant predictors of using discount versus premium snuff were being an adolescent, being an African-American, being a current or former smoker, living in a less populated region of the country, and using snuff frequently. Discount snuff advertising was associated with publication in magazines with a high youth readership.
CONCLUSIONS: Discount snuff has grown in popularity among male adolescents who have been a target of advertising. The tobacco's cheap price and high nicotine content pose a public health problem because of the potential for long-term tobacco use and dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23024245     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  7 in total

1.  The debate over weight- versus price-based taxation of snuff in the United States' state legislatures.

Authors:  David S Timberlake; Mojgan Sami; Sonam Patel; Shamili Thiagarajan; Ramin Badiyan; Shay Willard
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.222

2.  Advertising Receptivity and Youth Initiation of Smokeless Tobacco.

Authors:  David S Timberlake
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  The Case to Include Brand of Moist Snuff in Health Surveys.

Authors:  David S Timberlake
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  The Reach and Impact of Direct Marketing via Brand Websites of Moist Snuff.

Authors:  David S Timberlake; Tim A Bruckner; Vyvian Ngo; Dmitriy Nikitin
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-04

Review 5.  The Effect of Tobacco Control Policies on US Smokeless Tobacco Use: A Structured Review.

Authors:  David T Levy; Darren Mays; Raymond G Boyle; Jamie Tam; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 6.  A Policy Perspective on the Global Use of Smokeless Tobacco.

Authors:  Kamran Siddiqi; Aishwarya Lakshmi Vidyasagaran; Anne Readshaw; Ray Croucher
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2017-08-31

7.  Facebook Recruitment Using Zip Codes to Improve Diversity in Health Research: Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Cornelia Pechmann; Connor Phillips; Douglas Calder; Judith J Prochaska
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 7.076

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.