Glen P Mays1, Rachel A Hogg. 1. Department of Health Services Management, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. glen.mays@uky.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delivery system research to identify how best to organize, finance, and implement health improvement strategies has focused heavily on clinical practice settings, with relatively little attention paid to public health settings-where research is made more difficult by wide heterogeneity in settings and limited sources of existing data and measures. This study examines the approaches used by public health practice-based research networks (PBRNs) to expand delivery system research and evidence-based practice in public health settings. METHODS: Practice-based research networks employ quasi-experimental research designs, natural experiments, and mixed-method analytic techniques to evaluate how community partnerships, economic shocks, and policy changes impact delivery processes in public health settings. In addition, network analysis methods are used to assess patterns of interaction between practitioners and researchers within PBRNs to produce and apply research findings. RESULTS: Findings from individual PBRN studies elucidate the roles of information exchange, community resources, and leadership and decision-making structures in shaping implementation outcomes in public health delivery. Network analysis of PBRNs reveals broad engagement of both practitioners and researchers in scientific inquiry, with practitioners in the periphery of these networks reporting particularly large benefits from research participation. CONCLUSIONS: Public health PBRNs provide effective mechanisms for implementing delivery system research and engaging practitioners in the process. These networks also hold promise for accelerating the translation and application of research findings into public health settings.
BACKGROUND: Delivery system research to identify how best to organize, finance, and implement health improvement strategies has focused heavily on clinical practice settings, with relatively little attention paid to public health settings-where research is made more difficult by wide heterogeneity in settings and limited sources of existing data and measures. This study examines the approaches used by public health practice-based research networks (PBRNs) to expand delivery system research and evidence-based practice in public health settings. METHODS: Practice-based research networks employ quasi-experimental research designs, natural experiments, and mixed-method analytic techniques to evaluate how community partnerships, economic shocks, and policy changes impact delivery processes in public health settings. In addition, network analysis methods are used to assess patterns of interaction between practitioners and researchers within PBRNs to produce and apply research findings. RESULTS: Findings from individual PBRN studies elucidate the roles of information exchange, community resources, and leadership and decision-making structures in shaping implementation outcomes in public health delivery. Network analysis of PBRNs reveals broad engagement of both practitioners and researchers in scientific inquiry, with practitioners in the periphery of these networks reporting particularly large benefits from research participation. CONCLUSIONS: Public health PBRNs provide effective mechanisms for implementing delivery system research and engaging practitioners in the process. These networks also hold promise for accelerating the translation and application of research findings into public health settings.
Authors: Glen P Mays; Sharla A Smith; Richard C Ingram; Laura J Racster; Cynthia D Lamberth; Emma S Lovely Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Ross C Brownson; Paula Ballew; Brian Dieffenderfer; Debra Haire-Joshu; Gregory W Heath; Matthew W Kreuter; Bradford A Myers Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: C J Peek; Russell E Glasgow; Kurt C Stange; Lisa M Klesges; E Peyton Purcell; Rodger S Kessler Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jonathon P Leider; Gulzar Shah; Nikki Rider; Angela Beck; Brian C Castrucci; Jenine K Harris; Katie Sellers; Danielle Varda; Jiali Ye; Paul C Erwin; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ross C Brownson; Rodrigo S Reis; Peg Allen; Kathleen Duggan; Robert Fields; Katherine A Stamatakis; Paul C Erwin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Glen P Mays; Rachel A Hogg; Doris M Castellanos-Cruz; Anna G Hoover; Lizeth C Fowler Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Heather L Shepherd; Liesbeth Geerligs; Phyllis Butow; Lindy Masya; Joanne Shaw; Melanie Price; Haryana M Dhillon; Thomas F Hack; Afaf Girgis; Tim Luckett; Melanie Lovell; Brian Kelly; Philip Beale; Peter Grimison; Tim Shaw; Rosalie Viney; Nicole M Rankin Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2019-10-18
Authors: William C Livingood; Angela H Peden; Gulzar H Shah; Nandi A Marshall; Ketty M Gonzalez; Russell B Toal; Dayna S Alexander; Alesha R Wright; Lynn D Woodhouse Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 2.655