Literature DB >> 23022756

Completely laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy in stage I-III/C gastric cancer: safety, efficacy and five-year oncologic outcome.

L M Siani1, F Ferranti, A De Carlo, A Quintiliani.   

Abstract

AIM: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is becoming a minimally invasive procedure widely accepted by laparoscopic surgeons; yet, many doubts remain about its oncologic efficacy in treating malignant neoplasia. Aim of this study was to analyze our experience comparing completely laparoscopic total gastrectomy to its laparotomic counterpart, about safety, efficacy and five-year oncologic outcome.
METHODS: From January 2003 to October 2009, 25 patients with stage I-III/C gastric cancer (TNM Seventh Edition, 2010) were operated on and retrospectively compared to an homogeneous group of patients, stratified for age, stage of disease and comorbidities. Length of surgery, estimated blood loss, postoperative ileus, resumption of oral intake, morbidity, 30 days mortality, number of lymph nodes harvested, five years overall and disease free survival were analyzed, comparing the two groups.
RESULTS: There was no conversion. Thirty days mortality was zero for both groups, while morbidity was 16% in the lap group, 32% in the open group (P<0.05). Length of operation was 211±23 min for the lap group, and 185±19 min for the open group (P>0.05); the estimated blood loss was 250±150 mL for the lap group, 495±190 mL for the open group (P<0.05). Number of lymph nodes harvested was 35±18 for the lap group, 40±16 for the open group (P>0.05). No port site metastatic implantation occurred in any patient treated laparoscopically; five years overall and disease free survival were 55.7% and 54.2% for the lap group, 52.9% and 52.1% for the open group, respectively, with no statistical difference (P>0.05). Completely laparoscopic total gastrectomy represents a new challenge for the laparoscopic surgeon. In spite of clear advantage for patients, some debate remains about its oncologic efficacy in the middle and long period, even if many authors report comparable results to open total gastrectomy. In our experience, it is a safe and valid alternative to its open counterpart, with no statistically different number of lymph nodes harvested, five years overall and disease free survival in respect to the open gastrectomy. Yet, it remains a complex procedure requiring high laparoscopic skill.
CONCLUSION: In our opinion, completely laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a safe and effective procedure, with long term oncologic results not statistically different from the open procedure; yet, it requires high laparoscopic experience, especially to carry out an extended lymphadenectomy and to fashion the anastomosis. More randomized prospective trials are needed to state this procedure as a new gold-standard in treating stage I-III/C non metastatic gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23022756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Chir        ISSN: 0026-4733            Impact factor:   1.000


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weizhi Wang; Zheng Li; Jie Tang; Meilin Wang; Baolin Wang; Zekuan Xu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Xiong; Quentin M Nunes; Wei Huang; Chun-Lu Tan; Neng-Wen Ke; Si-Ming Xie; Xun Ran; Hao Zhang; Yong-Hua Chen; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Jia-Qin Cai; Xiao-Wu Xu; Di Wu; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Improving the outcomes in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Juul J W Tegels; Michiel F G De Maat; Karel W E Hulsewé; Anton G M Hoofwijk; Jan H M B Stoot
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.

Authors:  Marita D Bauman; David G Becerra; E Molly Kilbane; Nicholas J Zyromski; C Max Schmidt; Henry A Pitt; Attila Nakeeb; Michael G House; Eugene P Ceppa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Systematic review of anastomotic complications of esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mikito Inokuchi; Sho Otsuki; Yoshitaka Fujimori; Yuya Sato; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Kazuyuki Kojima
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Xiao-Wu Xu; Ren-Chao Zhang; Yu Pan; Di Wu; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological gastric surgery].

Authors:  Kaja Ludwig; Christian Barz; Uwe Scharlau
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Xiao-Wu Xu; Yi-Ping Mou; Yu Pan; Yu-Cheng Zhou; Ren-Chao Zhang; Di Wu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.