INTRODUCTION: We compared 2 anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) assays using a routine patient cohort. METHODS: Two-hundred ninety-five sera were collected from patients for whom ACPA was ordered and tested for ACPA by QUANTA Lite® CCP 3 (INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego) and EliA® CCP (CCP, Phadia, Germany). Rheumatoid factor (RF) was determined using Quantex RF(II) (Biokit, Spain). RESULTS: Acceptable qualitative (96.6%, kappa=0.93) and quantitative agreements (Spearman rho=0.77; p<0.0001) were observed between the two ACPA assays. Nine samples were CCP3+/CCP2- and one sample was CCP2+/CCP3-. Of the 9 CCP3+/CCP2- patients, 6 (66.7%) had RA, one patient had ankylosing spondylitis, one osteoarthritis and one psoriatic arthritis. The CCP3-/CCP2+ patient had juvenile RA. At the manufacturer's cut-offs, the sensitivities and specificities were 77.3%/98.1% (CCP2), 81.6%/96.8% (CCP3) and 65.2%/89.6% (RF), respectively. At 98.7% specificity level, the sensitivities in the total cohort were 59.6% (CCP2) and 69.5% (CCP3) while the sensitivities in the RF-negative group were 49.0% (CCP2) and 57.1% (CCP3). In the RF-negative group, sensitivities for patients with a disease duration of ≤ 5years were 38.7% (CCP2) and 51.6% (CCP3). CONCLUSION: Discrimination between RA and non-RA patients was better using CCP3, most pronounced in RF-negative RA.
INTRODUCTION: We compared 2 anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) assays using a routine patient cohort. METHODS: Two-hundred ninety-five sera were collected from patients for whom ACPA was ordered and tested for ACPA by QUANTA Lite® CCP 3 (INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego) and EliA® CCP (CCP, Phadia, Germany). Rheumatoid factor (RF) was determined using Quantex RF(II) (Biokit, Spain). RESULTS: Acceptable qualitative (96.6%, kappa=0.93) and quantitative agreements (Spearman rho=0.77; p<0.0001) were observed between the two ACPA assays. Nine samples were CCP3+/CCP2- and one sample was CCP2+/CCP3-. Of the 9 CCP3+/CCP2- patients, 6 (66.7%) had RA, one patient had ankylosing spondylitis, one osteoarthritis and one psoriatic arthritis. The CCP3-/CCP2+ patient had juvenile RA. At the manufacturer's cut-offs, the sensitivities and specificities were 77.3%/98.1% (CCP2), 81.6%/96.8% (CCP3) and 65.2%/89.6% (RF), respectively. At 98.7% specificity level, the sensitivities in the total cohort were 59.6% (CCP2) and 69.5% (CCP3) while the sensitivities in the RF-negative group were 49.0% (CCP2) and 57.1% (CCP3). In the RF-negative group, sensitivities for patients with a disease duration of ≤ 5years were 38.7% (CCP2) and 51.6% (CCP3). CONCLUSION: Discrimination between RA and non-RApatients was better using CCP3, most pronounced in RF-negative RA.
Authors: Kim D Jones; Terri Gelbart; Thomas C Whisenant; Jill Waalen; Tony S Mondala; David N Iklé; Daniel R Salomon; Robert M Bennett; Sunil M Kurian Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: Timothy S Travers; Lisa Harlow; Ivan O Rosas; Bernadette R Gochuico; Ted R Mikuls; Sanjoy K Bhattacharya; Carlos J Camacho; Dana P Ascherman Journal: J Immunol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Xiaobo Meng; Peyman Ezzati; Irene Smolik; Charles N Bernstein; Carol Ann Hitchon; Hani S El-Gabalawy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ine Vos; Christof Van Mol; Leendert A Trouw; Michael Mahler; Jaap A Bakker; Jan Van Offel; Luc De Clerck; Tom W Huizinga Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2017-06-03 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Laura Martinez-Prat; Michael J Nissen; Céline Lamacchia; Chelsea Bentow; Laura Cesana; Pascale Roux-Lombard; Cem Gabay; Michael Mahler Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 7.561