Literature DB >> 23021630

Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities.

Karen B Chen1, Anne B Savage, Amrish O Chourasia, Douglas A Wiegmann, Mary E Sesto.   

Abstract

Touch technology is becoming more prevalent as functionality improves and cost decreases. Therefore, it is important that this technology is accessible to users with diverse abilities. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of button and gap size on performance by individuals with varied motor abilities. Participants with (n = 38) and without (n = 15) a motor control disability completed a digit entry task. Button size ranged from 10 to 30 mm and gap size was either 1 or 3 mm. Results indicated that as button size increased, there was a decrease in misses, errors, and time to complete tasks. Performance for the non-disabled group plateaued at button size 20 mm, with minimal, if any gains observed with larger button sizes. In comparison, the disabled group's performance continued to improve as button size increased. Gap size did not affect user performance. These results may help to improve accessibility of touch technology.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23021630      PMCID: PMC3572909          DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  13 in total

1.  Assessing design features of virtual keyboards for text entry.

Authors:  Marita A O'Brien; Wendy A Rogers; Arthur D Fisk; Mark Richman
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  J E Ware; B Gandek
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Comparison of paper and computer-based questionnaire modes for measuring health outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nina Shervin; Janet Dorrwachter; Charles R Bragdon; David Shervin; David Zurakowski; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  User discomfort, work posture and muscle activity while using a touchscreen in a desktop PC setting.

Authors:  Gwanseob Shin; Xinhui Zhu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Effect of touch screen button size and spacing on touch characteristics of users with and without disabilities.

Authors:  Mary E Sesto; Curtis B Irwin; Karen B Chen; Amrish O Chourasia; Douglas A Wiegmann
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Performance and touch characteristics of disabled and non-disabled participants during a reciprocal tapping task using touch screen technology.

Authors:  Curt B Irwin; Mary E Sesto
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Effects of focal basal ganglia lesions on timing and force control.

Authors:  Paul Aparicio; Joern Diedrichsen; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Standing at a kiosk: effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference.

Authors:  Herbert Colle; Keith Hiszem
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; J F Lu; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Short Form 36 assessed health-related quality of life after focal spasticity therapy.

Authors:  Ulla Bergfeldt; Camilla Sköld; Per Julin
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Human centred design considerations for connected health devices for the older adult.

Authors:  Richard P Harte; Liam G Glynn; Barry J Broderick; Alejandro Rodriguez-Molinero; Paul M A Baker; Bernadette McGuiness; Leonard O'Sullivan; Marta Diaz; Leo R Quinlan; Gearóid ÓLaighin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-06-04

2.  Development of the optimal touchscreen interface for patients with scleroderma.

Authors:  Gianluca Moroncini; Agnese Brunzini; Alessandra Papetti; Emanuele Filippini; Valentina Maurizi; Giulia Cesaretti; Rosaria Gesuita; Armando Gabrielli; Michele Germani
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2020-10-19

3.  An mHealth App for Users with Dexterity Impairments: Accessibility Study.

Authors:  Daihua Yu; Bambang Parmanto; Brad Dicianno
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  The Effects of Smart Home Interface Touch Button Design Features on Performance among Young and Senior Users.

Authors:  Na Yu; Ziwei Ouyang; Hehe Wang; Da Tao; Liang Jing
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Study on Smart Home Interface Design Characteristics Considering the Influence of Age Difference: Focusing on Sliders.

Authors:  Na Yu; Ziwei Ouyang; Hehe Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  An Empirical Study on the Influence of Smart Home Interface Design on the Interaction Performance of the Elderly.

Authors:  Chengmin Zhou; Yingyi Dai; Ting Huang; Hanxiao Zhao; Jake Kaner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.