Literature DB >> 15513716

Standing at a kiosk: effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference.

Herbert Colle1, Keith Hiszem.   

Abstract

Touch screen input keys compete with other information for limited screen space. The present study estimated the smallest key size that would not degrade performance or user satisfaction. Twenty participants used finger touches to enter one, four or 10 digits in a numeric keypad displayed on a capacitive touch screen, while standing in front of a touch screen kiosk. Key size (10, 15, 20, 25 mm square) and edge-to-edge key spacing (1, 3 mm) were factorially combined. Performance was evaluated with response time and errors, and user preferences were obtained. Spacing had no measurable effects. Entry times were longer and errors were higher for smaller key sizes, but no significant differences were found between key sizes of 20 and 25 mm. Participants also preferred 20 mm keys to smaller keys, and they were indifferent between 20 and 25 mm keys. Therefore, a key size of 20 mm was found to be sufficiently large for land-on key entry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15513716     DOI: 10.1080/00140130410001724228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Human centred design considerations for connected health devices for the older adult.

Authors:  Richard P Harte; Liam G Glynn; Barry J Broderick; Alejandro Rodriguez-Molinero; Paul M A Baker; Bernadette McGuiness; Leonard O'Sullivan; Marta Diaz; Leo R Quinlan; Gearóid ÓLaighin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-06-04

2.  Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities.

Authors:  Karen B Chen; Anne B Savage; Amrish O Chourasia; Douglas A Wiegmann; Mary E Sesto
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  An mHealth App for Users with Dexterity Impairments: Accessibility Study.

Authors:  Daihua Yu; Bambang Parmanto; Brad Dicianno
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Numerical Simulation of the Dust Production and Transportation Law of an Intermediate Mine Heap.

Authors:  Zhian Huang; Yang Huang; Zhijun Yang; Jun Zhang; Yukun Gao; Zhenlu Shao; Yinghua Zhang; Mingli Chen
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-01-07

5.  The Effects of Smart Home Interface Touch Button Design Features on Performance among Young and Senior Users.

Authors:  Na Yu; Ziwei Ouyang; Hehe Wang; Da Tao; Liang Jing
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Study on Smart Home Interface Design Characteristics Considering the Influence of Age Difference: Focusing on Sliders.

Authors:  Na Yu; Ziwei Ouyang; Hehe Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  An Empirical Study on the Influence of Smart Home Interface Design on the Interaction Performance of the Elderly.

Authors:  Chengmin Zhou; Yingyi Dai; Ting Huang; Hanxiao Zhao; Jake Kaner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.