Literature DB >> 23020642

Visual aesthetics and human preference.

Stephen E Palmer1, Karen B Schloss, Jonathan Sammartino.   

Abstract

Human aesthetic preference in the visual domain is reviewed from definitional, methodological, empirical, and theoretical perspectives. Aesthetic science is distinguished from the perception of art and from philosophical treatments of aesthetics. The strengths and weaknesses of important behavioral techniques are presented and discussed, including two-alternative forced-choice, rank order, subjective rating, production/adjustment, indirect, and other tasks. Major findings are reviewed about preferences for colors (single colors, color combinations, and color harmony), spatial structure (low-level spatial properties, shape properties, and spatial composition within a frame), and individual differences in both color and spatial structure. Major theoretical accounts of aesthetic response are outlined and evaluated, including explanations in terms of mere exposure effects, arousal dynamics, categorical prototypes, ecological factors, perceptual and conceptual fluency, and the interaction of multiple components. The results of the review support the conclusion that aesthetic response can be studied rigorously and meaningfully within the framework of scientific psychology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23020642     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  71 in total

1.  Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.

Authors:  Vanessa Era; Matteo Candidi; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The evolution of early symbolic behavior in Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Kristian Tylén; Riccardo Fusaroli; Sergio Rojo; Katrin Heimann; Nicolas Fay; Niels N Johannsen; Felix Riede; Marlize Lombard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Color preference in red-green dichromats.

Authors:  Leticia Álvaro; Humberto Moreira; Julio Lillo; Anna Franklin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The imaginative mind.

Authors:  Anna Abraham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Alters how Specific Attributes are Weighed in Subjective Valuation.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Marcus Sefranek; Lesley K Fellows
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Color naming across languages reflects color use.

Authors:  Edward Gibson; Richard Futrell; Julian Jara-Ettinger; Kyle Mahowald; Leon Bergen; Sivalogeswaran Ratnasingam; Mitchell Gibson; Steven T Piantadosi; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Interfering with activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex via TMS affects social impressions updating.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Tomaso Vecchi; Alexander Todorov; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Aesthetic preference recognition of 3D shapes using EEG.

Authors:  Lin Hou Chew; Jason Teo; James Mountstephens
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Haptic aesthetics in the blind: A behavioral and fMRI investigation.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Lora T Likova
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2018

10.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.