Literature DB >> 23020551

3D tissue-engineered construct analysis via conventional high-resolution microcomputed tomography without X-ray contrast.

Roman S Voronov1, Samuel B VanGordon, Robert L Shambaugh, Dimitrios V Papavassiliou, Vassilios I Sikavitsas.   

Abstract

As the field of tissue engineering develops, researchers are faced with a large number of degrees of freedom regarding the choice of material, architecture, seeding, and culturing. To evaluate the effectiveness of a tissue-engineered strategy, histology is typically done by physically slicing and staining a construct (crude, time-consuming, and unreliable). However, due to recent advances in high-resolution biomedical imaging, microcomputed tomography (μCT) has arisen as a quick and effective way to evaluate samples, while preserving their structure in the original state. However, a major barrier for using μCT to do histology has been its inability to differentiate between materials with similar X-ray attenuation. Various contrasting strategies (hardware and chemical staining agents) have been proposed to address this problem, but at a cost of additional complexity and limited access. Instead, here we suggest a strategy for how virtual 3D histology in silico can be conducted using conventional μCT, and we provide an illustrative example from bone tissue engineering. The key to our methodology is an implementation of scaffold surface architecture that is ordered in relation to cells and tissue, in concert with straightforward image-processing techniques, to minimize the reliance on contrasting for material segmentation. In the case study reported, μCT was used to image and segment porous poly(lactic acid) nonwoven fiber mesh scaffolds that were seeded dynamically with mesenchymal stem cells and cultured to produce soft tissue and mineralized tissue in a flow perfusion bioreactor using an osteogenic medium. The methodology presented herein paves a new way for tissue engineers to identify and distinguish components of cell/tissue/scaffold constructs to easily and effectively evaluate the tissue-engineering strategies that generate them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23020551     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  3 in total

1.  Histological Method to Study the Effect of Shear Stress on Cell Proliferation and Tissue Morphology in a Bioreactor.

Authors:  Morgan Chabanon; Hervé Duval; Jérôme Grenier; Claire Beauchesne; Benoit Goyeau; Bertrand David
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.169

2.  Three-dimensional characterization of tissue-engineered constructs by contrast-enhanced nanofocus computed tomography.

Authors:  Ioannis Papantoniou; Maarten Sonnaert; Liesbet Geris; Frank P Luyten; Jan Schrooten; Greet Kerckhofs
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Multifactorial Optimization of Contrast-Enhanced Nanofocus Computed Tomography for Quantitative Analysis of Neo-Tissue Formation in Tissue Engineering Constructs.

Authors:  Maarten Sonnaert; Greet Kerckhofs; Ioannis Papantoniou; Sandra Van Vlierberghe; Veerle Boterberg; Peter Dubruel; Frank P Luyten; Jan Schrooten; Liesbet Geris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.