| Literature DB >> 23020166 |
Qiquan Sun1, Xianghua Huang, Song Jiang, Caihong Zeng, Zhihong Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since the term chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was removed from the Banff scheme in 2005, transplant glomerulopathy (TG) has been regarded as a clinicopathological entity that is one of the major causes of graft loss. To assess the distinction between CAN and TG, we performed a comprehensive evaluation comparing TG with traditional CAN.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23020166 PMCID: PMC3507718 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Demographic characteristics of thestudy population
| Mean age (years) | 42.88 ± 10.99 | 41.81 ± 8.91 | 0.356 |
| Male (%) | 34 (79.1%) | 29 (67.4%) | 0.330 |
| Primary disease (%) | |||
| CGN | 31 (72.1%) | 35 (81.4%) | 0.444 |
| DN | 1 (2.3%) | 0 | 1.0 |
| IgAN | 2 (4.7%) | 2 (4.7%) | 1.0 |
| FSGS | 2 (4.7%) | 1 (3.3%) | 1.0 |
| Alport syndrome | 0 | 2 (4.7%) | 0.494 |
| Others | 7 (16.3%) | 3 (7.0%) | 0.313 |
| Time from transplant to biopsy (years) | 4.93 ± 2.72 | 4.53 ± 2.52 | 0.772 |
| Immunosuppressive regimen (%) | |||
| CMP | 20 (46.5%) | 26 (60.5%) | 0.28 |
| FMP | 19 (44.2%) | 13 (30.2%) | 0.265 |
| CAP | 3 (7.0%) | 4 (9.3%) | 1.0 |
| Other | 1 (2.3%) | 0 | 1.0 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or number of cases. CGN: chronic glomerulonephritis; DN: diabetic nephropathy; IgAN: IgA nephropathy; FSGS: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; CMP: cyclosporine A (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids; FMP: Tacrolimus (Tac), MMF and steroids; CAP: CsA, azathioprine (AZA) and steroids.
Clinic features of theTG and non-TG groups at thetime of biopsy
| Proteinuria (g/24 h) | 2.01 ± 1.60 | 0.89 ± 0.96 | 0.001 |
| Patients with proteinuria | 40 (93.0%) | 20 (46.5%) | <0.001 |
| <1 g/24 h | 10 (23.3%) | 9 (20.9%) | 0.565 |
| 1-3.5 g/24 h | 22 (51.2%) | 10 (23.2%) | 0.007 |
| >3.5 g/24 h | 8 (18.6%) | 1 (2.3%) | 0.014 |
| Hematuria | 13 (30.2%) | 5 (11.6%) | 0.034 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 9.48 ± 2.18 | 10.66 ± 2.01 | 0.011 |
| Patients with anemia | 37 (86.0%) | 28 (65.1%) | 0.022 |
| Mild (9-12 g/dl) | 17 (39.5%) | 18 (41.9%) | 0.500 |
| Moderate (6-9 g/dl) | 18 (41.9%) | 10 (23.3%) | 0.050 |
| Severe (<6 g/dl) | 2 (4.7%) | 0 | 0.247 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 33.79 ± 4.89 | 39.50 ± 4.48 | 0.330 |
| Hypoalbuminemia | 26 (60.5%) | 5 (11.6%) | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl)* | 2.12 ± 1.26 | 2.00 ± 1.02 | 0.600 |
| Patients with the history of rejection | 15 (34.9%) | 14 (32.6%) | 0.943 |
| HCV infection | 15 (34.9%) | 3 (7.0%) | 0.003 |
| HLA-I antibodies present | 9/30(30%) | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0.018 |
| HLA-II antibodies present | 17/30 (56.7%) | 4/23 (17.4%) | 0.004 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or number of cases. *Creatinine compared in TG group had excluded 3 dialysis patients.
Pathologic features of theTG and non-TG groups*
| TG score | 1.88 ± 0.85 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | <0.0001 |
| C4d+ | 30 (69.8%) | 14 (32.6%) | 0.001 |
| C4d score | 1.91 ± 1.32 | 0.58 ± 0.96 | <0.0001 |
| Peritubular capillaritis present | 40 (93.0%) | 15 (34.9%) | <0.0001 |
| PTC score | 1.88 ± 0.79 | 0.49 ± 0.73 | <0.0001 |
| Glomerulitis present | 40 (93.0%) | 27 (62.8%) | 0.001 |
| Glomerulitis score | 1.35 ± 0.69 | 0.79 ± 0.74 | <0.001 |
| Mesangial matrix expansion score | 1.58 ± 0.62 | 1.07 ± 0.63 | <0.001 |
| Interstitial fibrosis (ci) | 1.51 ± 0.83 | 1.33 ± 0.72 | 0.27 |
| Tubular atrophy (ct) | 1.49 ± 0.88 | 1.47 ± 0.77 | 0.89 |
| Fibrous intimal thickening (cv) | 1.14 ± 0.83 | 0.91 ± 0.68 | 0.16 |
| IgA stain positive(%) | 19 (44.2%) | 7 (16.3%) | 0.005 |
| IgA score | 0.70 ± 0.86 | 0.26 ± 0.62 | 0.008 |
| CD4 cell infiltration in glomerular | 0.82 ± 0.84 | 0.31 ± 0.53 | 0.002 |
| CD8 cell infiltration in glomerular | 0.86 ± 1.15 | 0.49 ± 0.90 | 0.127 |
| CD68 cell infiltration in glomerular | 7.84 ± 6.19 | 1.64 ± 2.98 | <0.001 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or number of cases. *Evaluation of the biopsies was based on the Banff ’07 acute and chronic indices, including presence of glomerulitis, TG, mesangial matrix expansion (based on silver stain), degree of PTC congestion, extent of interstitial fibrosis (based on trichrome stain) and tubular atrophy, vascular pathology, and deposition of C4d.
Figure 1The graft survival aftertransplantation of TG andnon-TG group. The median graft survival was 115.4 months in TG group, while it was 170.4 months in non-TG group (P =0.05).
Figure 2The graft survival afterbiopsy of TG andnon-TG group. The median graft survival after biopsy in TG group and non-TG was 34.1 months and 38.1 months respectively (P = 0.04).
Clinical features of theC4d- and C4d + in TG at thetime of biopsy
| Hematuria | 9 (30%) | 4 (30.8%) | 0.487 |
| Proteinuria (g/24 hrs) | 2.44 ± 2.23 | 1.71 ± 1.49 | 0.218 |
| Albumin(g/L) | 33.86 ± 5.08 | 35.86 ± 2.25 | 0.020 |
| hypoalbuminemia | 21 (70.0%) | 5 (38.4%) | 0.055 |
| Creatinine(mg/dl) | 2.53 ± 1.83 | 2.61 ± 1.51 | 0.891 |
| History of AR | 10 (33.3%) | 5 (38.5%) | 0.504 |
| HCV infection | 13 (43.3%) | 2 (15.4%) | 0.108 |
| HLA-I antibodies present | 7/19 (36.8%) | 2/11 (18.2%) | 0.258 |
| HLA-II antibodies present | 14/19 (73.6%) | 3/11 (27.3%) | 0.018 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or number of cases.
Pathologic features of theC4d- and C4d + in TG
| TG score | 2.07 ± 0.89 | 1.44 ± 0.66 | 0.018 |
| PTC score | 2.10 ± 0.48 | 1.38 ± 1.12 | 0.044 |
| Glomerulitis score | 1.37 ± 0.67 | 1.31 ± 0.75 | 0.809 |
| Mesangial matrix expansion Score | 1.70 ± 0.58 | 1.31 ± 0.63 | 0.070 |
| Interstitial fibrosis (ci) | 1.50 ± 0.77 | 1.54 ± 0.96 | 0.900 |
| Tubular atrophy (ct) | 1.47 ± 0.77 | 1.54 ± 1.12 | 0.837 |
| Fibrous intimal thickening (cv) | 1.30 ± 0.72 | 0.77 ± 1.13 | 0.104 |
| IgA stain positive(%) | 16 (43.3%) | 3 (23.1%) | 0.065 |
| IgA score | 0.80 ± 0.84 | 0.46 ± 0.87 | 0.253 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or number of cases.
Clinical and pathologic featuresof the HCV + and HCV- in TG
| Hematuria | 7 (46.7%) | 6 (21.4%) | 0.087 |
| Proteinuria (g/24 hrs) | 2.74 ± 1.71 | 1.65 ± 1.36 | 0.043 |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 31.15 ± 6.12 | 35.13 ± 3.28 | 0.009 |
| Elevated liver transaminases (%) | 3 (20%) | 0 | 0.037 |
| Cryoglobulinemia present | 2 (13.3%) | 0 | 0.116 |
| HCV RNA test positive | 4 (26.7%) | 0 | 0.011 |
| TG score | 2.27 ± 0.79 | 1.68 ± 0.81 | 0.029 |
| C4d+ | 86.7% (13/15) | 60.7% (17/28) | 0.075 |
| C4d score | 2.53 ± 1.06 | 1.57 ± 1.34 | 0.021 |
| IgA stain positive (%) | 5 (33.3%) | 14 (50%) | 0.349 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or number of cases.
Figure 3The graft survival aftertransplantation of HCV- and HCV + in TG. The median graft survival after transplantation in HCV- group and HCV + was 156 months and 96 months respectively (P = 0.05).
Figure 4The graft survival afterbiopsy of HCV + and HCV- in TG. The median graft survival after biopsy in HCV- group and HCV + was 48 months and 24 months respectively (P = 0.005).
Figure 5TG is strongly correlatedwith the antibody andantibody-related lesions: the incidence of HLAantibodies (HLA-I antibodies: 30%vs. 4.3%, P = 0.018; HLA-II antibodies: 56.7%vs. 17.4%, P = 0.004),PTC C4d deposition(69.8%vs. 32.6%, P = 0.001),PTC inflammation(93.0%vs. 34.9%, P < 0.001)and glomerulitis(93.0%vs. 62.8%, P = 0.001)were higher in TGpatients.