Literature DB >> 23016764

Less is not more: neural responses to missing and superfluous accents in context.

Diana V Dimitrova1, Laurie A Stowe, Gisela Redeker, John C J Hoeks.   

Abstract

Prosody, particularly accent, aids comprehension by drawing attention to important elements such as the information that answers a question. A study using ERP registration investigated how the brain deals with the interpretation of prosodic prominence. Sentences were embedded in short dialogues and contained accented elements that were congruous or incongruous with respect to a preceding question. In contrast to previous studies, no explicit prosodic judgment task was added. Robust effects of accentuation were evident in the form of an "accent positivity" (200-500 msec) for accented elements irrespective of their congruity. Our results show that incongruously accented elements, that is, superfluous accents, activate a specific set of neural systems that is inactive in case of incongruously unaccented elements, that is, missing accents. Superfluous accents triggered an early positivity around 100 msec poststimulus, followed by a right-lateralized negative effect (N400). This response suggests that redundant information is identified immediately and leads to the activation of a neural system that is associated with semantic processing (N400). No such effects were found when contextually expected accents were missing. In a later time window, both missing and superfluous accents triggered a late positivity on midline electrodes, presumably related to making sense of both kinds of mismatching stimuli. These results challenge previous findings of greater processing for missing accents and suggest that the natural processing of prosody involves a set of distinct, temporally organized neural systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23016764     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

Review 1.  A review on the cognitive function of information structure during language comprehension.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Xiaoqing Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  The neural processing of pitch accents in continuous speech.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; James S German; G Nike Gnanateja; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.054

3.  N400 amplitude, latency, and variability reflect temporal integration of beat gesture and pitch accent during language processing.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Nicole Landi; Julia Irwin; James C McPartland
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.610

4.  Conversation electrified: ERP correlates of speech act recognition in underspecified utterances.

Authors:  Rosa S Gisladottir; Dorothee J Chwilla; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  When correction turns positive: processing corrective prosody in Dutch.

Authors:  Diana V Dimitrova; Laurie A Stowe; John C J Hoeks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The Temporal Prediction of Stress in Speech and Its Relation to Musical Beat Perception.

Authors:  Eleonora J Beier; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

7.  Neurobehavioral Correlates of Surprisal in Language Comprehension: A Neurocomputational Model.

Authors:  Harm Brouwer; Francesca Delogu; Noortje J Venhuizen; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-11

8.  An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail?

Authors:  Nienke Meulman; Laurie A Stowe; Simone A Sprenger; Moniek Bresser; Monika S Schmid
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.