Literature DB >> 23015882

Proximal hamstring avulsion injuries: a technique note on surgical repairs.

Mathew Pombo1, James P Bradley.   

Abstract

Proximal hamstring avulsions from the ischium are becoming more frequently recognized, secondary to their disability when treated nonoperatively. The acute repair of these injuries is becoming prevalent given the improved outcomes reported in the literature. Anatomic studies have recently been conducted on the proximal hamstring origin; however, there are few reports on surgical techniques for repair in the setting of injury. The present article describes the technique for proximal hamstring avulsion repair, as performed by the senior author. More than 30 cases have been performed based on this technique, with excellent results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  avulsion; proximal hamstring injury; repair

Year:  2009        PMID: 23015882      PMCID: PMC3445245          DOI: 10.1177/1941738109332259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Health        ISSN: 1941-0921            Impact factor:   3.843


Acute hamstring strains are one of the most common injuries in athletes, and the majority are successfully treated with nonoperative measures.[1,2,21] However, proximal hamstring avulsions from the ischial tuberosity are a distinct type of injury. They are increasingly recognized as needing surgical intervention, leading to a delay in return to sport and to long-lasting functional impairments when not treated appropriately.[2-8,10-14,19,20,22] Early case reports and anatomic studies show positive results from surgical repair of proximal hamstring injuries. For surgical repair, early diagnosis is critical to facilitating a successful outcome and preventing long-term functional impairment. Ishikawa et al[10] made the first such report of surgical repair in 1988—specifically, 2 cases of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions. Reported rates of return to preinjury levels have ranged from 88% to 100%, but each study included a small number of case reports.[4,7,10,11,14-16] A repaired hamstring tendon may be almost as functional as the uninjured hamstring (88% to 91% on Cybex testing).[11,16] Surgical repair of proximal hamstring injuries may lead to improved functional outcomes.[2-8,10-14,19,20,22] Proximal hamstring tendon anatomy, injury classification, and repair techniques have been detailed in previous publications.[6,9,17,18] Anatomic studies have shown that the proximal hamstrings consist of a conjoint tendon (biceps femoris and semitendinosus) that inserts posterior and inferior on the ischial tuberosity to the more proximal-anterior semimembranosus tendon. In considering the need for a surgical repair of the proximal hamstring tendons, injury classification is important, given that some injury patterns can be successfully treated nonoperatively. The surgical procedure can be divided into 3 steps: patient positioning and surgical exposure, tendon repair, and postoperative protocol.

Operative Technique

Patient Positioning and Surgical Exposure

The patient is placed in the prone position on the operating room table, with all bony prominences padded and with the table flexed 20° (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Hamstring repair reclining: table flexed 20°.

Hamstring repair reclining: table flexed 20°. A transverse incision is made in the gluteal crease of the affected leg, directly inferior to the ischial tuberosity (Figure 2). A transverse incision is preferred to a traditionally described longitudinal incision, because of improved cosmesis and accessibility to the avulsed tendons. If inferior dissection is warranted to retrieve retracted tendons, this incision can be extended by making a T limb down the back of the thigh.
Figure 2.

Gluteal incision: inferior to the ischial tuberosity.

Gluteal incision: inferior to the ischial tuberosity. The incision is dissected to the gluteal fascia, which is incised transversely while taking care to avoid injury to the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve. This provides access to the gluteus maximus muscle. When the muscle fibers of the gluteus maximus are exposed, the dissection is carried out longitudinally by splitting the muscle fibers in line with their length. This is accomplished by locating a raphe that is in line, and just inferior to, the ischial tuberosity at palpation. This will expose the hamstring fascia in which the hamstring tendons are located. A longitudinal incision is made in the hamstring fascia. Typically, hematoma and/or serous fluid in an acute setting will be expressed. In more chronic settings, a layer of fibrous tissue (scar), or pseudosheath, can lie over the ruptured coalescence of the hamstring tendons and so give the appearance of intact tendons. This layer must be incised to expose the avulsed tendons. Care should be taken to protect the sciatic nerve, which in chronic cases may become adherent and scarred to the area of injury. Staying within the hamstring fascia, or pseudosheath, is an important component in the protection of the sciatic nerve (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Normal proximal hamstring anatomy. The sciatic nerve is 1.2 ± 0.2 cm lateral to the tendons; the inferior gluteal nerve is more proximal but can be in danger with proximal and lateral deviation during exposure.

Normal proximal hamstring anatomy. The sciatic nerve is 1.2 ± 0.2 cm lateral to the tendons; the inferior gluteal nerve is more proximal but can be in danger with proximal and lateral deviation during exposure.

Tendon Repair

The sciatic nerve should be protected by gentle lateral blunt retraction. After the tendons have been exposed and the tear pattern identified, the fibrotic tissue on the ends of the tendons should be debrided to normal tissue (Figures 4 and 5). Care should be taken not to remove an excessive amount of tissue, because doing so may shorten the tendon.
Figure 4.

Fibrotic tissue on the ends of the tendons debrided to normal tissue.

Figure 5.

Open repair: avoid removing excessive amount of tendon tissue to avoid shortening the tendon.

Fibrotic tissue on the ends of the tendons debrided to normal tissue. Open repair: avoid removing excessive amount of tendon tissue to avoid shortening the tendon. The tendons are mobilized and tagged with heavy suture for traction. The ischial tuberosity is identified, as is the hamstring insertion on its inferolateral aspect. A periosteal elevator, rongeur, and curette are used to expose the anatomic origin of the tendons, which will denude the bone and so provide for direct tendon healing to bone. Motorized burrs should not be used because they may cause iatrogenic injuries to the sciatic nerve. The semimembranosus tendon is located anterior and lateral to the conjoint tendon (composed of the long head of the biceps femoris and the semitendinosus tendons).[17] Five suture anchors are placed into the ischial tuberosity, in an X-shaped configuration, by drilling perpendicular to the facet of the hamstring origin. Care is taken not to plunge through both cortices of the tuberosity. The authors prefer bioabsorbable suture anchors with abrasion resistant suture (2.8 mm × 18.0 cm, BioRoc EZ, Dupuy Mitek, Raynham, Massachusetts). The sutures are then passed through the tendon in a similar X-like fashion, using horizontal mattress sutures (Figure 6). The Bunnell, modified Kessler, and modified Mason-Allen stitches are not used because they bunch up the tendon at the bony interface and thus shorten the tendon.
Figure 6.

Hamstring repair: sutures passed through tendon in X-like formation.

Hamstring repair: sutures passed through tendon in X-like formation. At this point, the knee is flexed 30° to 60° to take tension off the proximal hamstring before finalizing the repair. The sutures are then tied, from the inferior position to the superior (Figure 7).
Figure 7.

Hamstring repair: sutures tied, inferior to superior.

Hamstring repair: sutures tied, inferior to superior. After repair, the gluteus fascia is closed. A postoperative hip-knee orthosis is used to limit hip flexion to 15° to reduce stress on the tendon repair. Knee motion is not restricted in the orthosis.

Postoperative Protocol

The first phase of rehabilitation lasts 6 weeks. The patient is kept at touch down weight bearing for 2 weeks and is advanced to 25% weight bearing over the following 3 weeks. This allows slight hip and knee flexion but limits the stress at the repair site. Passive range of motion of the knee and hip begins at 2 weeks, and active hip range of motion begins at 4 weeks. Hip range of motion is advanced 10° each week after surgery in the hip-knee orthosis until the end of the first phase. The second phase starts with full weight bearing at 6 weeks postoperatively. Gait training is initiated. Passive and active range of motion is progressed. Isotonic exercises and aquatherapy are begun within a limited range, avoiding terminal range of hip flexion (more than 110°). At 8 weeks, isotonic strengthening is begun and dynamic training is advanced. At 10 weeks, an isometric strength evaluation is performed at 60° of knee flexion. The final phase of rehabilitation begins at 10 weeks postoperatively. Dry-land jogging is initiated with continued strengthening. A full isokinetic evaluation at 60°, 120°, and 180° is performed and then compared to that of the uninjured leg. Sport-specific activities are emphasized and return to play permitted when isokinetic testing on the repaired leg is 80% of the unaffected side. This typically occurs between 6 and 9 months.
  22 in total

1.  Complete rupture of the hamstring origin from a water skiing injury.

Authors:  R B Blasier; L G Morawa
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The proximal origin of the hamstrings and surrounding anatomy encountered during repair. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Suzanne L Miller; Julie Gill; Gavin R Webb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Acute proximal hamstring rupture.

Authors:  Steven Cohen; James Bradley
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  The proximal origin of the hamstrings and surrounding anatomy encountered during repair. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Suzanne L Miller; Gavin R Webb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Avulsion of the hamstring muscles from the ischial tuberosity. A report of two cases.

Authors:  K Ishikawa; K Kai; H Mizuta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Radiographic imaging of muscle strain injury.

Authors:  K P Speer; J Lohnes; W E Garrett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Hamstring injuries. Proposed aetiological factors, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  J C Agre
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Histochemical correlates of hamstring injuries.

Authors:  W E Garrett; J C Califf; F H Bassett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Avulsion fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  J N Metzmaker; A M Pappas
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Rupture of the ischial origin of the hamstring muscles.

Authors:  S Orava; U M Kujala
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  9 in total

1.  Functional impairment after successful surgical reconstruction for proximal hamstring avulsion.

Authors:  Raymond Best; Julia Eberle; Florian Beck; Johannes Beckmann; Ulrich Becker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the attachment sites of the proximal hamstrings.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Fernando P Ferro; Kevin J Campbell; Max P Michalski; Mary T Goldsmith; Brian M Devitt; Coen A Wijdicks; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Gross anatomical and dimensional characteristics of the proximal hamstring origin.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Johannes E Plath; Gernot Seppel; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Andreas B Imhoff; Peter U Brucker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor.

Authors:  Alexander Otto; Alyssa M DiCosmo; Joshua B Baldino; Julian Mehl; Elifho Obopilwe; Mark P Cote; Andreas B Imhoff; Knut Beitzel; Augustus D Mazzocca; Katherine Coyner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-02

5.  Predictive Factors Influencing Functional Results After Proximal Hamstring Tendon Avulsion Surgery: A Patient-Reported Outcome Study After 227 Operations From a Single Center.

Authors:  Raymond Best; Anorte Meister; Malin Meier; Jochen Huth; Ulrich Becker
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-29

6.  The Efficacy of an Ultrasound-Guided Improved Puncture Path Technique of Nerve Block/Pulsed Radiofrequency for Pudendal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Dan Zhu; Zhenzhen Fan; Fujun Cheng; Yuping Li; Xingyue Huo; Jian Cui
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-18

7.  ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ANTERIOR THIGH SELF-MASSAGE ON HIP RANGE-OF-MOTION IN TRAINED MEN.

Authors:  Estêvão Rios Monteiro; Andrew D Vigotsky; Jefferson da Silva Novaes; Jakob Škarabot
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-02

8.  [Clinical results after refixation of proximal hamstring tendon ruptures comparing different anchor systems].

Authors:  M Irger; P Forkel; A B Imhoff; L Willinger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries.

Authors:  Mitchel R Obey; Stephen M Broski; Robert J Spinner; Mark S Collins; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-01-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.