Literature DB >> 23012465

MR thermometry analysis of sonication accuracy and safety margin of volumetric MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Young-sun Kim1, Hervé Trillaud, Hyunchul Rhim, Hyo K Lim, Willem Mali, Marianne Voogt, Jörg Barkhausen, Thomas Eckey, Max O Köhler, Bilgin Keserci, Charles Mougenot, Shunmugavelu D Sokka, Jouko Soini, Heikki J Nieminen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of the size and location of the ablation zone produced by volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids on the basis of MR thermometric analysis and to assess the effects of a feedback control technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained. Thirty-three women with 38 uterine fibroids were treated with an MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound system capable of volumetric feedback ablation. Size (diameter times length) and location (three-dimensional displacements) of each ablation zone induced by 527 sonications (with [n=471] and without [n=56] feedback) were analyzed according to the thermal dose obtained with MR thermometry. Prospectively defined acceptance ranges of targeting accuracy were ±5 mm in left-right (LR) and craniocaudal (CC) directions and ±12 mm in anteroposterior (AP) direction. Effects of feedback control in 8- and 12-mm treatment cells were evaluated by using a mixed model with repeated observations within patients.
RESULTS: Overall mean sizes of ablation zones produced by 4-, 8-, 12-, and 16-mm treatment cells (with and without feedback) were 4.6 mm±1.4 (standard deviation)×4.4 mm±4.8 (n=13), 8.9 mm±1.9×20.2 mm±6.5 (n=248), 13.0 mm±1.2×29.1 mm±5.6 (n=234), and 18.1 mm±1.4×38.2 mm±7.6 (n=32), respectively. Targeting accuracy values (displacements in absolute values) were 0.9 mm±0.7, 1.2 mm±0.9, and 2.8 mm±2.2 in LR, CC, and AP directions, respectively. Of 527 sonications, 99.8% (526 of 527) were within acceptance ranges. Feedback control had no statistically significant effect on targeting accuracy or ablation zone size. However, variations in ablation zone size were smaller in the feedback control group.
CONCLUSION: Sonication accuracy of volumetric MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids appears clinically acceptable and may be further improved by feedback control to produce more consistent ablation zones. © RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23012465     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Preservation of the endometrial enhancement after magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of submucosal uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Young-Sun Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Hyo Keun Lim; Hyunchul Rhim; Sin-Ho Jung; Joong Hyun Ahn; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Volumetric MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound versus uterine artery embolisation for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: comparison of symptom improvement and reintervention rates.

Authors:  Marlijne E Ikink; Robbert J Nijenhuis; Helena M Verkooijen; Marianne J Voogt; Paul J H M Reuwer; Albert J Smeets; Paul N M Lohle; Maurice A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU) Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  G Pron
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Improving thermal dose accuracy in magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery: Long-term thermometry using a prior baseline as a reference.

Authors:  Rachel R Bitton; Taylor D Webb; Kim Butts Pauly; Pejman Ghanouni
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Accurate MR thermometry by hyperpolarized 129 Xe.

Authors:  Le Zhang; Alex Burant; Andrew McCallister; Victor Zhao; Karl M Koshlap; Simone Degan; Michael Antonacci; Rosa Tamara Branca
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Pediatric Sarcomas Are Targetable by MR-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU): Anatomical Distribution and Radiological Characteristics.

Authors:  Jenny Shim; Robert M Staruch; Korgun Koral; Xian-Jin Xie; Rajiv Chopra; Theodore W Laetsch
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Drift correction for accurate PRF-shift MR thermometry during mild hyperthermia treatments with MR-HIFU.

Authors:  Chenchen Bing; Robert M Staruch; Matti Tillander; Max O Köhler; Charles Mougenot; Mika Ylihautala; Theodore W Laetsch; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 8.  Thermal and mechanical high-intensity focused ultrasound: perspectives on tumor ablation, immune effects and combination strategies.

Authors:  Renske J E van den Bijgaart; Dylan C Eikelenboom; Martijn Hoogenboom; Jurgen J Fütterer; Martijn H den Brok; Gosse J Adema
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.968

9.  An Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Robotic HIFU Ablation Experimental System and Accuracy Evaluations.

Authors:  Chih Yu An; Jia Hao Syu; Ching Shiow Tseng; Chih-Ju Chang
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 1.781

10.  Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring tissue change during magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy in bone applications: an ex-vivo study.

Authors:  Sharon L Giles; Jessica M Winfield; David J Collins; Ian Rivens; John Civale; Gail R Ter Haar; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.