Literature DB >> 23012460

Solid breast lesions: clinical experience with US-guided diffuse optical tomography combined with conventional US.

Wenxiang Zhi1, Xingang Gu, Jianmin Qin, Peihao Yin, Xia Sheng, Sizhi Paul Gao, Qi Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the clinical efficacy of using diffuse optical tomography (DOT) and ultrasonographic (US) localization with conventional US to differentiate malignant solid breast lesions from those that are benign.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board and all patients provided written informed consent. One hundred two consecutive women (mean age, 43 years; range, 18-86 years) who were referred for open biopsy with 136 breast lesions underwent conventional US and DOT with US localization. Total hemoglobin concentration and oxygen saturation were measured for each breast lesion. Sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were determined with surgical pathologic examination results as the verification standard.
RESULTS: Of the 136 biopsied lesions, 54 were carcinomas and 82 were benign. The average total hemoglobin concentration in the malignant group was 223.3 μmol/L±55.8 (standard deviation), and the average hemoglobin concentration in the benign group was 122.5 μmol/L±80.6 (P=.005). When the maximum hemoglobin concentration of 137.8 μmol/L was used as the threshold value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of DOT with US localization were 96.3%, 65.9%, 65.0%, 96.4%, and 76.5%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of conventional US were 96.3%, 92.6%, 89.7%, 97.4%, and 93.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of conventional US combined with DOT were 100%, 93.9%, 91.5%, 100%, and 96.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: US-guided DOT combined with conventional US improves accuracy compared with DOT alone. © RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23012460     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of optical breast imaging: Multi-modality systems for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Steven Poplack
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Prospective assessment of adjunctive ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography in women undergoing breast biopsy: Impact on BI-RADS assessments.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Catherine A Young; Ian S Hagemann; Jingqin Luo; Cheryl R Herman; Kimberly Wiele; Shuying Li; Yifeng Zeng; Matthew F Covington; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.531

3.  Effect of vascular haemoglobin concentrations on ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Ning Lv; Ni He; Yaopan Wu; Chuanmiao Xie; Yue Wang; Yanan Kong; Weidong Wei; Peihong Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Assessment of Functional Differences in Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions and Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy by Using US-guided Diffuse Optical Tomography in Conjunction with Conventional US.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Andrew Ricci; Poornima Hegde; Mark Kane; Edward Cronin; Alex Merkulov; Yan Xu; Behnoosh Tavakoli; Susan Tannenbaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  An investigation of the classification accuracy of a deep learning framework-based computer-aided diagnosis system in different pathological types of breast lesions.

Authors:  Mengsu Xiao; Chenyang Zhao; Qingli Zhu; Jing Zhang; He Liu; Jianchu Li; Yuxin Jiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  US-localized diffuse optical tomography in breast cancer: comparison with pharmacokinetic parameters of DCE-MRI and with pathologic biomarkers.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Min-Ying Su; Hon J Yu; Jeon-Hor Chen; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Ji Soo Choi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  US-guided Diffuse Optical Tomography: Clinicopathological Features Affect Total Hemoglobin Concentration in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wenxiang Zhi; Yu Wang; Cai Chang; Fen Wang; Yaling Chen; Na Hu; Xiaoli Zhu; Li Xie
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.243

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.