Literature DB >> 2301192

Impact of a drug bulletin on the knowledge, perception of drug utility, and prescribing behavior of physicians.

P Denig1, F M Haaijer-Ruskamp, D H Zijsling.   

Abstract

The impact of a drug bulletin was tested in a randomized controlled trial that included 186 family physicians. The length of the trial was six months. It was hypothesized that printed information, such as in drug bulletins, influences physician prescribing behavior by changing their knowledge of drug efficacy and adverse effects and their perceptions of drug utility. Therefore, the impact of a drug bulletin was evaluated on these domains of influence. Interview data were used to assess changes in knowledge, perceived drug utility, and stated prescribing. Health insurance funds' records were used to collect actual prescribing data. Information in the bulletin on the treatment of renal colic changed physicians' knowledge as well as perceived utility of drugs used for renal colic (p less than 0.05). Significant changes in stated prescribing were also found. On the other hand, advice in the same bulletin on the treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) had no impact at all. It did not even improve the knowledge of the physicians about the drugs used for IBS. Apparently, the message about the treatment of IBS failed to gain the attention of the physicians. It is suggested that some messages are sufficiently transmitted through written information, and others that are seen as less relevant or too difficult to implement need more intensive strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2301192     DOI: 10.1177/106002809002400116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DICP        ISSN: 1042-9611


  16 in total

1.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Measuring the impact of medicines information services on patient care: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Anne Spinewine; Bryony Dean
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-10

3.  Doctors perceptions of the influences on their prescribing: a comparison of general practitioners based in rural and urban Australia.

Authors:  Christopher Cutts; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Pharmacoeconomic consequences of measurement and modification of hospital drug use.

Authors:  L L Ioannides-Demos; G M Eckert; A J McLean
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Drug utilisation studies as tools in health economics.

Authors:  J A Sacristán; J Soto
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Impact of feedback and peer review on prescribing.

Authors:  F M Haaijer-Ruskamp; P Denig
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1995-02

7.  Hospital-based adverse drug reaction bulletin : an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jimmy Jose; Padma G M Rao; Beena Jimmy
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Design and results of a group counter-detailing DUR educational program.

Authors:  K B Farris; D M Kirking; L A Shimp; R A Opdycke
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Anik Giguère; France Légaré; Jeremy Grimshaw; Stéphane Turcotte; Michelle Fiander; Agnes Grudniewicz; Sun Makosso-Kallyth; Fredric M Wolf; Anna P Farmer; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

10.  Drug prescription attitudes and behaviour of general practitioners. Effects of a problem-oriented educational programme.

Authors:  A Ekedahl; S I Andersson; B Hovelius; S Mölstad; H Liedholm; A Melander
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.