Literature DB >> 23011599

Coupling between feedback loops in autoregulatory networks affects bistability range, open-loop gain and switching times.

Abhinav Tiwari1, Oleg A Igoshin.   

Abstract

Biochemical regulatory networks governing diverse cellular processes such as stress-response, differentiation and cell cycle often contain coupled feedback loops. We aim at understanding how features of feedback architecture, such as the number of loops, the sign of the loops and the type of their coupling, affect network dynamical performance. Specifically, we investigate how bistability range, maximum open-loop gain and switching times of a network with transcriptional positive feedback are affected by additive or multiplicative coupling with another positive- or negative-feedback loop. We show that a network's bistability range is positively correlated with its maximum open-loop gain and that both quantities depend on the sign of the feedback loops and the type of feedback coupling. Moreover, we find that the addition of positive feedback could decrease the bistability range if we control the basal level in the signal-response curves of the two systems. Furthermore, the addition of negative feedback has the capacity to increase the bistability range if its dissociation constant is much lower than that of the positive feedback. We also find that the addition of a positive feedback to a bistable network increases the robustness of its bistability range, whereas the addition of a negative feedback decreases it. Finally, we show that the switching time for a transition from a high to a low steady state increases with the effective fold change in gene regulation. In summary, we show that the effect of coupled feedback loops on the bistability range and switching times depends on the underlying mechanistic details.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23011599      PMCID: PMC3501141          DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/5/055003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  41 in total

1.  Negative autoregulation linearizes the dose-response and suppresses the heterogeneity of gene expression.

Authors:  Dmitry Nevozhay; Rhys M Adams; Kevin F Murphy; Kresimir Josic; Gábor Balázsi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Building biological memory by linking positive feedback loops.

Authors:  Dong-Eun Chang; Shelly Leung; Mariette R Atkinson; Aaron Reifler; Daniel Forger; Alexander J Ninfa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interlinking positive and negative feedback loops creates a tunable motif in gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Tian; Xiao-Peng Zhang; Feng Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-07-31

4.  The combination of positive and negative feedback loops confers exquisite flexibility to biochemical switches.

Authors:  Benjamin Pfeuty; Kunihiko Kaneko
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  An integrated regulatory network including two positive feedback loops to modulate the activity of sigma(E) in mycobacteria.

Authors:  Riccardo Manganelli; Roberta Provvedi
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Comparison of classical and autogenous systems of regulation in inducible operons.

Authors:  M A Savageau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Two-component signaling circuit structure and properties.

Authors:  Mark Goulian
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Modeling reveals bistability and low-pass filtering in the network module determining blood stem cell fate.

Authors:  Jatin Narula; Aileen M Smith; Berthold Gottgens; Oleg A Igoshin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  Feedback loops shape cellular signals in space and time.

Authors:  Onn Brandman; Tobias Meyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Multistable decision switches for flexible control of epigenetic differentiation.

Authors:  Raúl Guantes; Juan F Poyatos
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  17 in total

1.  Design of a bistable switch to control cellular uptake.

Authors:  Diego A Oyarzún; Madalena Chaves
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Unraveling the regulatory connections between two controllers of breast cancer cell fate.

Authors:  Jinho Lee; Abhinav Tiwari; Victor Shum; Gordon B Mills; Michael A Mancini; Oleg A Igoshin; Gábor Balázsi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Multi-stability in cellular differentiation enabled by a network of three mutually repressing master regulators.

Authors:  Atchuta Srinivas Duddu; Sarthak Sahoo; Souvadra Hati; Siddharth Jhunjhunwala; Mohit Kumar Jolly
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Axon growth regulation by a bistable molecular switch.

Authors:  Pranesh Padmanabhan; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Interlinked GTPase cascades provide a motif for both robust switches and oscillators.

Authors:  Andreas Ehrmann; Basile Nguyen; Udo Seifert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Cell Fate Specification Based on Tristability in the Inner Cell Mass of Mouse Blastocysts.

Authors:  Laurane De Mot; Didier Gonze; Sylvain Bessonnard; Claire Chazaud; Albert Goldbeter; Geneviève Dupont
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A novel TGFβ modulator that uncouples R-Smad/I-Smad-mediated negative feedback from R-Smad/ligand-driven positive feedback.

Authors:  Wenchao Gu; Rui Monteiro; Jie Zuo; Filipa Costa Simões; Andrea Martella; Charlotte Andrieu-Soler; Frank Grosveld; Tatjana Sauka-Spengler; Roger Patient
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Maximization of information transmission influences selection of native phosphorelay architectures.

Authors:  Rui Alves; Baldiri Salvadó; Ron Milo; Ester Vilaprinyo; Albert Sorribas
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  A survey of HK, HPt, and RR domains and their organization in two-component systems and phosphorelay proteins of organisms with fully sequenced genomes.

Authors:  Baldiri Salvado; Ester Vilaprinyo; Albert Sorribas; Rui Alves
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Realization of tristability in a multiplicatively coupled dual-loop genetic network.

Authors:  Bo Huang; Yun Xia; Feng Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.