Literature DB >> 23011495

An uncemented metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: factors affecting survival and outcome.

N D Clement1, A D Duckworth, R C Colling, A N Stirrat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reported survivorship of total shoulder replacement (TSR) is variable. This is probably related to implant design. We report the outcome and survivorship of the uncemented glenoid in patients with osteoarthritis receiving a TSR with an intact or repairable rotator cuff at surgery.
METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients were analysed after TSR using a screw-fixed porous coated metal-back glenoid performed by a single surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of five years. Thirty-three TSRs in 32 patients (19 women) with a mean age of 67 years were analysed, two of whom died before five years of follow-up. Thirty patients (31 shoulders) were monitored for a mean of 95 months (60-173 months).
RESULTS: The Constant score improved by 22 points (p < 0.001). The only significant predictor of outcome on logistic regression analysis was the preoperative Constant score, with better scores resulting in a lesser improvement at last follow-up (p < 0.0001). Implant survivorship at ten years was 93 %. Three were revisions: two for polyethylene wear (both at six years) but with a well-fixed glenoid, and another for loosening of the glenoid at 11 years postoperatively. Univariate analysis identified that younger age (56 year vs. 68 years, p = 0.03) and a higher combined preoperative Constant score (35.7 vs. 21.5, p = 0.03) were both predictors of failure.
CONCLUSION: The uncemented glenoid performs well in the medium term for osteoarthritis of the shoulder in older patients, giving improved and sustained functional outcome. Age and preoperative level of function are predictors of outcome and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23011495     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-012-0308-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  4 in total

Review 1.  Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-01

2.  Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  M O Gauci; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; M Baba; G Walch; P Boileau
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 3.  Do Modern Designs of Metal-Backed Glenoid Components Show Improved Clinical Results in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Fahad Alabdullatif; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Myung Jin Shin; Hyojune Kim; Dongjun Park; Erica Kholinne; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-28

4.  Catastrophic failure of a low profile metal-backed glenoid component after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carley B Vuillermin; Mark E Trump; Shane A Barwood; Gregory A Hoy
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.