Literature DB >> 23009967

Current methods of labor induction.

Geeta K Swamy1.   

Abstract

In 2009, approximately 23% of all pregnant women in the United States underwent induction of labor, which is more than double the incidence of 9.5% in 1990. The ultimate goal of labor induction is to achieve vaginal delivery by stimulating uterine contractions before the spontaneous onset of labor. Labor induction is clearly indicated when the benefits outweigh the maternal and fetal risks of continued gestation, as well as potential risks associated with the procedure. Many women undergoing labor induction require cervical ripening--a method to facilitate softening, thinning, and dilation of an unfavorable cervix--because it reduces the time to delivery and incidence of failed induction. This article summarizes currently available methods for labor induction and cervical ripening, advantages and disadvantages of various methods, and the safety and effectiveness of each method based on well-conducted clinical trials.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23009967     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  7 in total

1.  [Clinical efficacy and safety of controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a multicenter retrospective study].

Authors:  Xue-Yuan Li; Yue-Wen Guo; Yan-Wen Xu; Bin Zhu; Xue-Xue Wu; Xiang Chen; Xiao-Yi Wang; Dun-Jin Chen; Hui Chen; Jian-Ping Zhang; Zhi-Jian Wang; Sheng-Li An
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  Association between length of gestation and cervical DNA methylation of PTGER2 and LINE 1-HS.

Authors:  Heather H Burris; Andrea A Baccarelli; Valeria Motta; Hyang-Min Byun; Allan C Just; Adriana Mercado-Garcia; Joel Schwartz; Katherine Svensson; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Robert O Wright
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Osmotic pump tablets for delivery of antiretrovirals to the vaginal mucosa.

Authors:  Rachna Rastogi; Ryan S Teller; Pedro M M Mesquita; Betsy C Herold; Patrick F Kiser
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 5.970

4.  A simplified cervix model in response to induction balloon in pre-labour.

Authors:  James Andrew Smith
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.432

5.  Sequential Versus Concurrent Use of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ibrahim Abd Elgafor El Sharkwy; Elsayed Hamdy Noureldin; Ekramy Abd Elmoneim Mohamed; Sherine Attia Shazly
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-11-07

6.  Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.

Authors:  Xiu Wang; Aijun Yang; Qingyong Ma; Xuelan Li; Li Qin; Tongqiang He
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.

Authors:  Daniele Bolla; Saskia Vanessa Weissleder; Anda-Petronela Radan; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Luigi Raio; Martin Müller; Daniel Surbek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.