Literature DB >> 23009869

Drain placement can be safely omitted after the majority of robotic partial nephrectomies.

Ronney Abaza1, David Prall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Drain placement after partial nephrectomy is considered standard but it is based on routine and not on evidence. With experience we performed robotic partial nephrectomy and routinely omitted a drain even with significant collecting system violation. We have rarely used drains after robotic partial nephrectomy for several years, and we report our outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a single surgeon, prospective database of all robotic partial nephrectomies from February 2008 to March 2012, including the characteristics of those with and without a drain.
RESULTS: The 150 patients underwent a total of 160 robotic partial nephrectomy procedures with a drain used in 11 patients and omitted in 93%. Mean patient age was 57 years (range 22 to 89), mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.8 (range 2 to 4) and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m(2) (range 18 to 54). Values were similar in patients with and without a drain. In patients without a drain and in those with a drain mean tumor size was 3.5 cm (range 1.0 to 11.0) and 4.6 cm (range 1.1 to 8.6), and mean R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar lines, hilar tumor touching main renal artery or vein) nephrometry score was 7.8 (range 4 to 12) and 8.8 (range 6 to 11), respectively. Collecting system violation occurred in 88 patients (59%), including 78 without a drain. Two patients (1.3%) required transfusion with no intervention for bleeding. All except 5 patients (97%) were discharged home on postoperative day 1 with all drains removed before discharge. In 2 patients (1.3%) without a drain small urinomas without infection developed more than 2 weeks postoperatively, which were treated with a week of Foley catheter drainage and percutaneous drainage, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Drain placement after robotic partial nephrectomy can be routinely omitted with a low rate of urine leaks, which can be managed safely when they rarely occur.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23009869     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Postoperative drainage does not prevent complications after robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Benoit Peyronnet; Benjamin Pradère; Alexandre De La Taille; Franck Bruyère; Nicolas Doumerc; Stéphane Droupy; Christophe Vaessen; Hervé Baumert; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Morgan Rouprêt; Arnaud Mejean; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Elimination of surgical drains following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Amanda E Kahn; Ashley M Shumate; Colleen T Ball; David D Thiel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-01-09

3.  Possible impact of continuous drainage after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hidekazu Tachibana; Shoichi Iida; Tsunenori Kondo; Hironori Fukuda; Toshio Takagi; Junpei Iizuka; Yasunobu Hashimoto; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy without routine drainage does not increase postoperative morbidity.

Authors:  Dong Hyeon An; Jae Hyeon Han; Myoung Jin Jang; Joomin Aum; Yu Seon Kim; Dalsan You
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.