Literature DB >> 23007907

Gene-expression analysis reveals that embryonic stem cells cultured under osteogenic conditions produce mineral non-specifically compared to marrow stromal cells or osteoblasts.

Nicholas D Evans1, Robin J Swain, Eileen Gentleman, Molly M Gentleman, Molly M Stevens.   

Abstract

Pluripotent cells, such as embryonic stem cells (ESCs), divide indefinitely and can differentiate to form mineralised nodules in response to osteogenic supplements. This suggests that they may be used as a cell source for bone replacement strategies. Here, we related the expression of osteogenic and chondrogenic genes in cultures of murine ESCs, marrow stromal cells (MSCs) and calvarial osteoblasts (OBs) cultured under osteogenic conditions to the biochemical composition and quantity of mineral formed. Mineralisation, measured by calcium sequestration, was >2-fold greater in ESC cultures than in either MSCs or OBs. Micro-Raman spectroscopy and spectral mapping revealed a lower mineral-to-matrix ratio and confirmed a more diffuse pattern of mineralisation in ESCs compared to MSCs and OBs. Baseline expression of chondrogenic and osteogenic genes was between 1 and 4 orders of magnitude greater in MSCs and OBs than in ESCs. Osteogenic culture of MSCs and OBs was accompanied by increases in osteogenic gene expression by factors of ~100 compared to only ~10 in ESCs. Consequentially, peak expression of osteogenic and chondrogenic genes was greater in MSCs and OBs than ESCs by factors of 100-1000, despite the fact that mineralisation was more extensive in ESCs than either MSCs or OBs. We also observed significant cell death in ESC nodules. We conclude that the mineralised material observed in cultures of murine ESCs during osteogenic differentiation may accumulate non-specifically, perhaps in necrotic cell layers, and that thorough characterisation of the tissue formed by ESCs must be achieved before these cells can be considered as a cell source for clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23007907      PMCID: PMC5833941          DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v024a15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cell Mater        ISSN: 1473-2262            Impact factor:   3.942


  48 in total

1.  Automated method for subtraction of fluorescence from biological Raman spectra.

Authors:  Chad A Lieber; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Osteoblastic differentiation of monkey embryonic stem cells in vitro.

Authors:  Akihiro Yamashita; Tatsuyuki Takada; Junko Narita; Gaku Yamamoto; Ryuzo Torii
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Bone substitutes: an update.

Authors:  Peter V Giannoudis; Haralambos Dinopoulos; Eleftherios Tsiridis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  Fracture healing: the diamond concept.

Authors:  Peter V Giannoudis; Thomas A Einhorn; David Marsh
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Embryonic origin and Hox status determine progenitor cell fate during adult bone regeneration.

Authors:  Philipp Leucht; Jae-Beom Kim; Raimy Amasha; Aaron W James; Sabine Girod; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 6.  Bone development and its relation to fracture repair. The role of mesenchymal osteoblasts and surface osteoblasts.

Authors:  F Shapiro
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.942

7.  Cultivation of human embryonic stem cells without the embryoid body step enhances osteogenesis in vitro.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Karp; Lino S Ferreira; Ali Khademhosseini; Albert H Kwon; Judy Yeh; Robert S Langer
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 6.277

8.  Differentiation of osteoblasts and in vitro bone formation from murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  L D Buttery; S Bourne; J D Xynos; H Wood; F J Hughes; S P Hughes; V Episkopou; J M Polak
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2001-02

9.  Multipotent adult germ-line stem cells, like other pluripotent stem cells, can be killed by cytotoxic T lymphocytes despite low expression of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules.

Authors:  Ralf Dressel; Kaomei Guan; Jessica Nolte; Leslie Elsner; Sebastian Monecke; Karim Nayernia; Gerd Hasenfuss; Wolfgang Engel
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes.

Authors:  Jo Vandesompele; Katleen De Preter; Filip Pattyn; Bruce Poppe; Nadine Van Roy; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-06-18       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  From blastocyst to gastrula: gene regulatory networks of embryonic stem cells and early mouse embryogenesis.

Authors:  David-Emlyn Parfitt; Michael M Shen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Pluripotent stem cells as a source of osteoblasts for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Hui Zhu; Takaharu Kimura; Srilatha Swami; Joy Y Wu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Pluripotent Stem Cells and Skeletal Regeneration--Promise and Potential.

Authors:  Joy Y Wu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Functional comparison of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal cells and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells from the same donor.

Authors:  Solvig Diederichs; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.272

5.  Composition of Mineral Produced by Dental Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  A A Volponi; E Gentleman; R Fatscher; Y W Y Pang; M M Gentleman; P T Sharpe
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Raman Spectroscopic Analyses of Jaw Periosteal Cell Mineralization.

Authors:  Eva Brauchle; Daniel Carvajal Berrio; Melanie Rieger; Katja Schenke-Layland; Siegmar Reinert; Dorothea Alexander
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.443

7.  An engineered, quantifiable in vitro model for analysing the effect of proteostasis-targeting drugs on tissue physical properties.

Authors:  Sandra Loaiza; Silvia A Ferreira; Tamara M Chinn; Alex Kirby; Elena Tsolaki; Camilla Dondi; Katarzyna Parzych; Adam P Strange; Laurent Bozec; Sergio Bertazzo; Martin A B Hedegaard; Eileen Gentleman; Holger W Auner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Proteomic Analysis of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix: Achieving a Competent Biomaterial for Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Gabriela M Monteiro-Lobato; Pedro S T Russo; Flavia V Winck; Luiz H Catalani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 3.246

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.