Literature DB >> 23006492

Genetic diversity in widespread species is not congruent with species richness in alpine plant communities.

Pierre Taberlet1, Niklaus E Zimmermann, Thorsten Englisch, Andreas Tribsch, Rolf Holderegger, Nadir Alvarez, Harald Niklfeld, Gheorghe Coldea, Zbigniew Mirek, Atte Moilanen, Wolfgang Ahlmer, Paolo Ajmone Marsan, Enzo Bona, Maurizio Bovio, Philippe Choler, Elżbieta Cieślak, Licia Colli, Vasile Cristea, Jean-Pierre Dalmas, Božo Frajman, Luc Garraud, Myriam Gaudeul, Ludovic Gielly, Walter Gutermann, Nejc Jogan, Alexander A Kagalo, Grażyna Korbecka, Philippe Küpfer, Benoît Lequette, Dominik Roman Letz, Stéphanie Manel, Guilhem Mansion, Karol Marhold, Fabrizio Martini, Riccardo Negrini, Fernando Niño, Ovidiu Paun, Marco Pellecchia, Giovanni Perico, Halina Piękoś-Mirkowa, Filippo Prosser, Mihai Puşcaş, Michał Ronikier, Martin Scheuerer, Gerald M Schneeweiss, Peter Schönswetter, Luise Schratt-Ehrendorfer, Fanny Schüpfer, Alberto Selvaggi, Katharina Steinmann, Conny Thiel-Egenter, Marcela van Loo, Manuela Winkler, Thomas Wohlgemuth, Tone Wraber, Felix Gugerli, Mark Vellend.   

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims at the conservation of all three levels of biodiversity, that is, ecosystems, species and genes. Genetic diversity represents evolutionary potential and is important for ecosystem functioning. Unfortunately, genetic diversity in natural populations is hardly considered in conservation strategies because it is difficult to measure and has been hypothesised to co-vary with species richness. This means that species richness is taken as a surrogate of genetic diversity in conservation planning, though their relationship has not been properly evaluated. We tested whether the genetic and species levels of biodiversity co-vary, using a large-scale and multi-species approach. We chose the high-mountain flora of the Alps and the Carpathians as study systems and demonstrate that species richness and genetic diversity are not correlated. Species richness thus cannot act as a surrogate for genetic diversity. Our results have important consequences for implementing the CBD when designing conservation strategies.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23006492     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  26 in total

1.  Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Hanson; Jonathan R Rhodes; Cynthia Riginos; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Systematic conservation planning for intraspecific genetic diversity.

Authors:  Ivan Paz-Vinas; Géraldine Loot; Virgilio Hermoso; Charlotte Veyssière; Nicolas Poulet; Gaël Grenouillet; Simon Blanchet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies.

Authors:  Deborah M Leigh; Charles B van Rees; Katie L Millette; Martin F Breed; Chloé Schmidt; Laura D Bertola; Brian K Hand; Margaret E Hunter; Evelyn L Jensen; Francine Kershaw; Libby Liggins; Gordon Luikart; Stéphanie Manel; Joachim Mergeay; Joshua M Miller; Gernot Segelbacher; Sean Hoban; Ivan Paz-Vinas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Conservation priorities for Prunus africana defined with the aid of spatial analysis of genetic data and climatic variables.

Authors:  Barbara Vinceti; Judy Loo; Hannes Gaisberger; Maarten J van Zonneveld; Silvio Schueler; Heino Konrad; Caroline A C Kadu; Thomas Geburek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Polyploidisation and geographic differentiation drive diversification in a European High Mountain Plant Group (Doronicum clusii Aggregate, Asteraceae).

Authors:  Clemens Pachschwöll; Pedro Escobar García; Manuela Winkler; Gerald M Schneeweiss; Peter Schönswetter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Population Genetic Diversity in the Australian 'Seascape': A Bioregion Approach.

Authors:  Lisa C Pope; Cynthia Riginos; Jennifer Ovenden; Jude Keyse; Simon P Blomberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genetic sorting of subordinate species in grassland modulated by intraspecific variation in dominant species.

Authors:  Danny J Gustafson; Charles Major; Dewitt Jones; John Synovec; Sara G Baer; David J Gibson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Parallel declines in species and genetic diversity driven by anthropogenic disturbance: a multispecies approach in a French Atlantic dune system.

Authors:  David Frey; Nils Arrigo; Gilles Granereau; Anouk Sarr; François Felber; Gregor Kozlowski
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Relationships between adaptive and neutral genetic diversity and ecological structure and functioning: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raj Whitlock
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 6.256

10.  The DNA of coral reef biodiversity: predicting and protecting genetic diversity of reef assemblages.

Authors:  Kimberly A Selkoe; Oscar E Gaggiotti; Eric A Treml; Johanna L K Wren; Mary K Donovan; Robert J Toonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.