Literature DB >> 23002363

High-risk esophageal varices in patients treated with locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment with liver computed tomography.

Hyojin Kim1, Dongil Choi, Joon Hyeok Lee, Soon Jin Lee, Hangi Jo, Geum-Youn Gwak, Kwang Cheol Koh, Moon Seok Choi, Seonwoo Kim.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the diagnostic performance of follow-up liver computed tomography (CT) for the detection of high-risk esophageal varices in patients treated with locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 100 patients with cirrhosis who underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation or both procedures for HCCs. All patients underwent upper endoscopy and subsequently liver CT. Three radiologists independently evaluated the presence of high-risk esophageal varices with transverse images alone and with three orthogonal multiplanar reformation (MPR) images, respectively. With endoscopic grading as the reference standard, diagnostic performance was assessed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: The diagnostic performances (areas under the ROC curve) of three observers with transverse images alone were 0.947 ± 0.031, 0.969 ± 0.024, and 0.916 ± 0.038, respectively. The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value (PPV), and negative predicative value (NPV) with transverse images alone were 90.1%, 86.39%, 70.9%, and 95.9%, respectively. The diagnostic performances, mean sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV with three orthogonal MPR images (0.965 ± 0.025, 0.959 ± 0.027, 0.938 ± 0.033, 91.4%, 89.5%, 76.3%, and 96.6%, respectively) were not superior to corresponding values with transverse images alone (P > 0.05), except for the mean specificity (P = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: Our results showed excellent diagnostic performance, sensitivity and NPV to detect high-risk esophageal varices on follow-up liver CT after locoregional therapy for HCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; High-risk esophageal varices; Liver computed tomography; Locoregional therapy; Multiplanar reformation images

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23002363      PMCID: PMC3447273          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  18 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria.

Authors:  S Nahum Goldberg; Clement J Grassi; John F Cardella; J William Charboneau; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra Gervais; Alice R Gillams; Robert A Kane; Fred T Lee; Tito Livraghi; John McGahan; David A Phillips; Hyunchul Rhim; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients: evaluation with liver CT.

Authors:  Young Jun Kim; Steven S Raman; Nam C Yu; Katherine J To'o; Rome Jutabha; David S K Lu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: multidetector CT esophagography--comparison with endoscopy.

Authors:  Se Hyung Kim; Yoon Jun Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Kee Don Choi; Young Jin Chung; Joon Koo Han; Jae Young Lee; Min Woo Lee; Chang Jin Han; Joon Il Choi; Kyung-Sook Shin; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Evaluation of esophageal varices by multidetector-row CT: correlation with endoscopic 'red color sign'.

Authors:  Hirofumi Mifune; Shiro Akaki; Kentaro Ida; Tetsuro Sei; Susumu Kanazawa; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Acta Med Okayama       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.892

7.  General rules for recording endoscopic findings of esophagogastric varices (1991). Japanese Society for Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Y Idezuki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Computing sample size for receiver operating characteristic studies.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleed: preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B K De; U C Ghoshal; T Das; A Santra; P K Biswas
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.029

10.  A prospective evaluation of computerized tomographic (CT) scanning as a screening modality for esophageal varices.

Authors:  Roman E Perri; Michael V Chiorean; Jeff L Fidler; Joel G Fletcher; Jayant A Talwalkar; Linda Stadheim; Nilay D Shah; Patrick S Kamath
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reporting.

Authors:  Thaworn Dendumrongsup; Andrew A Plumb; Steve Halligan; Thomas R Fanshawe; Douglas G Altman; Susan Mallett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.