Literature DB >> 18393388

A prospective evaluation of computerized tomographic (CT) scanning as a screening modality for esophageal varices.

Roman E Perri1, Michael V Chiorean, Jeff L Fidler, Joel G Fletcher, Jayant A Talwalkar, Linda Stadheim, Nilay D Shah, Patrick S Kamath.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Patients with cirrhosis require endoscopic screening for large esophageal varices. The aims of this study were to determine the cost-effectiveness and patient preferences of a strategy employing abdominal computerized tomography (CT) as the initial screening test for identifying large esophageal varices. In a prospective evaluation,102 patients underwent both CT and endoscopic screening for gastroesophageal varices. Two radiologists read each CT independently; standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was the reference standard. Agreement between radiologists, and between endoscopists regarding size of varices was determined using kappa statistic. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to determine the optimal screening strategy for varices. Patient preference was assessed by questionnaire. CT was found to have approximately 90% sensitivity in the identification of esophageal varices determined to be large on endoscopy, but only about 50% specificity. The sensitivity of CT in detecting gastric varices was 87%. In addition, a significant number of gastric varices, peri-esophageal varices, and extraluminal pathology were identified by CT that were not identified by endoscopy. Patients overwhelmingly preferred CT over endoscopy. Agreement between radiologists was good regarding the size of varices (Kappa = 0.56), and exceeded agreement between endoscopists (Kappa = 0.36). Use of CT as the initial screening modality for the detection of varices was significantly more cost-effective compared to endoscopy irrespective of the prevalence of large varices.
CONCLUSION: Abdominal CT as the initial screening test for varices could be cost-effective. CT also permits evaluation of extra-luminal pathology that impacts management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18393388     DOI: 10.1002/hep.22219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  26 in total

1.  High-risk esophageal varices in patients treated with locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with regular follow-up liver CT.

Authors:  Hyojin Kim; Dongil Choi; Geum-Youn Gwak; Joon Hyeok Lee; Soon Jin Lee; Seong Hyun Kim; Ji Young Lee; Yulri Park; Ilsoo Chang; Hyo K Lim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Screening for esophageal varices.

Authors:  Sara Lemoinne; Dominique Thabut
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-11-09

3.  Life-threatening variceal hemorrhage in a woman with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Bashar Almadani; Namita Sood; Martha Yearsley; William M Lee
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2012-06

4.  High-risk esophageal varices in patients treated with locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment with liver computed tomography.

Authors:  Hyojin Kim; Dongil Choi; Joon Hyeok Lee; Soon Jin Lee; Hangi Jo; Geum-Youn Gwak; Kwang Cheol Koh; Moon Seok Choi; Seonwoo Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Aaron Fischman; Thomas Schiano; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-14

6.  Diagnostic non-invasive model of large risky esophageal varices in cirrhotic hepatitis C virus patients.

Authors:  Hatem Elalfy; Walid Elsherbiny; Ashraf Abdel Rahman; Dina Elhammady; Shaker Wagih Shaltout; Ayman Z Elsamanoudy; Bassem El Deek
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-28

Review 7.  Natural history of pancreatitis-induced splenic vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its incidence and rate of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  James R Butler; George J Eckert; Nicholas J Zyromski; Michael J Leonardi; Keith D Lillemoe; Thomas J Howard
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Detection of esophageal varices using CT and MRI.

Authors:  Michael J Lipp; Arkady Broder; David Hudesman; Pauline Suwandhi; Steven A Okon; Mitchell Horowitz; David J Clain; Patricia Friedmann; Albert D Min
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Esophageal varices on computed tomography and subsequent variceal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ma Somsouk; Katherine To'o; Mujtaba Ali; Eric Vittinghoff; Benjamin M Yeh; Judy Yee; Alex Monto; John M Inadomi; Rizwan Aslam
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-04

10.  Re: Optimal diagnostic tool for surveillance of oesophageal varices during COVID-19 pandemic. A reply.

Authors:  D Jothimani; S Danielraj; B Nallathambi; B Pandurangan; S Kalyanasundaram; K Subbiah; H Ramachandran; R Venugopal; D Dhas; M Rela
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 2.350

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.