PURPOSE: We performed a phase-1 pharmacokinetic optimal dosing study of intraventricular topotecan (IT), administered daily 5×, to determine whether, the maximum tolerated dose of IT topotecan was also the pharmacokinetic optimal dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received topotecan administered through an intraventricular access device (0.1 or 0.2 mg/dose), daily × 5 every other week 2× (Induction); every 3 weeks × 2 (Consolidation); then every 4 weeks for up to 11 courses (Maintenance). Ventricular CSF pharmacokinetic studies were performed on day 1, week 1 of induction, and in a subset of patients after a single intralumbar topotecan dose on day 1, week 3. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. All were evaluable for toxicity and 18 were assessable for pharmacokinetics. Arachnoiditis requiring corticosteroid therapy occurred in or one of three patients at the 0.1 mg dose level and two of the initial three patients enrolled at the 0.2 mg dose level. All subsequent patients were therefore treated with concomitant dexamethasone. Pharmacokinetic evaluation after accrual of the first seven patients revealed that a topotecan lactone concentration >1 ng/ml for 8 hours was attained in all patients and thus, further dose escalation was not pursued. Results of simulation studies showed that at the dose levels evaluated, >99.9% of patients are expected to achieve CSF topotecan lactone concentrations >1 ng/ml for at least 8 hours. CONCLUSION: Intraventricular topotecan, 0.2 mg, administered daily for 5 days with concomitant dexamethasone is well tolerated and was defined to be the pharmacokinetic optimal dose in this trial.
PURPOSE: We performed a phase-1 pharmacokinetic optimal dosing study of intraventricular topotecan (IT), administered daily 5×, to determine whether, the maximum tolerated dose of IT topotecan was also the pharmacokinetic optimal dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received topotecan administered through an intraventricular access device (0.1 or 0.2 mg/dose), daily × 5 every other week 2× (Induction); every 3 weeks × 2 (Consolidation); then every 4 weeks for up to 11 courses (Maintenance). Ventricular CSF pharmacokinetic studies were performed on day 1, week 1 of induction, and in a subset of patients after a single intralumbar topotecan dose on day 1, week 3. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. All were evaluable for toxicity and 18 were assessable for pharmacokinetics. Arachnoiditis requiring corticosteroid therapy occurred in or one of three patients at the 0.1 mg dose level and two of the initial three patients enrolled at the 0.2 mg dose level. All subsequent patients were therefore treated with concomitant dexamethasone. Pharmacokinetic evaluation after accrual of the first seven patients revealed that a topotecan lactone concentration >1 ng/ml for 8 hours was attained in all patients and thus, further dose escalation was not pursued. Results of simulation studies showed that at the dose levels evaluated, >99.9% of patients are expected to achieve CSFtopotecan lactone concentrations >1 ng/ml for at least 8 hours. CONCLUSION: Intraventricular topotecan, 0.2 mg, administered daily for 5 days with concomitant dexamethasone is well tolerated and was defined to be the pharmacokinetic optimal dose in this trial.
Authors: G Stockhammer; W Poewe; S Burgstaller; F Deisenhammer; A Muigg; S Kiechl; E Schmutzhard; H Maier; S Felber; P Schumacher; E Gunsilius; G Gastl Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-04-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: P J Houghton; P J Cheshire; L Myers; C F Stewart; T W Synold; J A Houghton Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 1992 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Eric T Wong; David Alsop; Diana Lee; Angela Tam; Loretta Barron; Julianne Bloom; Shiva Gautam; Julian K Wu Journal: Cerebrospinal Fluid Res Date: 2008-01-11
Authors: Megan O Jacus; Vinay M Daryani; K Elaine Harstead; Yogesh T Patel; Stacy L Throm; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Carol S Palackdkharry; Stephanie Wottrich; Erin Dienes; Mohamad Bydon; Michael P Steinmetz; Vincent C Traynelis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Diana M Byrnes; Fernando Vargas; Christopher Dermarkarian; Ryan Kahn; Deukwoo Kwon; Judith Hurley; Jonathan H Schatz Journal: J Oncol Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 4.375
Authors: Rebecca M Hill; Sabine L A Plasschaert; Beate Timmermann; Christelle Dufour; Kristian Aquilina; Shivaram Avula; Laura Donovan; Maarten Lequin; Torsten Pietsch; Ulrich Thomale; Stephan Tippelt; Pieter Wesseling; Stefan Rutkowski; Steven C Clifford; Stefan M Pfister; Simon Bailey; Gudrun Fleischhack Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: María Belen Cancela; Santiago Zugbi; Ursula Winter; Ana Laura Martinez; Claudia Sampor; Mariana Sgroi; Jasmine H Francis; Ralph Garippa; David H Abramson; Guillermo Chantada; Paula Schaiquevich Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Gregory M Shackleford; Min Y Mahdi; Rex A Moats; Debra Hawes; Hung C Tran; Jonathan L Finlay; Tuan Q Hoang; Ellis F Meng; Anat Erdreich-Epstein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240