Literature DB >> 1464161

Evaluation of 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin against xenografts derived from adult and childhood solid tumors.

P J Houghton1, P J Cheshire, L Myers, C F Stewart, T W Synold, J A Houghton.   

Abstract

The topoisomerase I inhibitor 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan) was evaluated against a panel of xenografts comprising four lines of adult colon adenocarcinoma, three colon tumors derived from adolescents, six childhood rhabdomyosarcomas from previously untreated patients as well as sublines selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine and melphalan, and three lines of childhood osteogenic sarcoma. Efficacy was determined at maximal tolerated dose levels using intermittent i.p. administration [every 4 days for 4 doses (q4dx4)] or daily p.o. or i.p. administration 5 days per week for up to 20 courses. On a q4dx4 schedule, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 12.5 mg/kg per administration, which caused marked weight loss and lethality in approximately 5% of the tumor-bearing mice. This schedule caused significant growth inhibition (but no tumor regression) in advanced adult colon adenocarcinomas. The minimal treated/control (T/C) ratios were 0.49, 0.54, and 0.3 for three of the tumor lines and were achieved at 18-21 days after the initiation of treatment. In contrast, rhabdomyosarcomas were considerably more sensitive, with T/C ratios being < 0.1 for three lines, whereas topotecan was less active against two other rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts (minimal T/C ratios, 0.17 and 0.14). As inhibitors of topoisomerase I have been demonstrated to have activity in the replication phase of the cell cycle (S-phase-specific), prolonged administration schedules were examined. Mice received topotecan 5 days per week for 3 weeks either by i.p. injection or by oral gavage (p.o.). In selected experiments, p.o. administration was continued for up to 20 weeks. Oral administration for 3 weeks (2 mg/kg per dose) resulted in complete regression of all six lines of rhabdomyosarcoma, with two lines demonstrating no regrowth during the period of observation (> or = 84 days). Similar results were obtained after i.p. administration, suggesting significant schedule dependency for these tumors. For colon tumors, the daily administration schedule (i.p. or p.o.) demonstrated some advantage over the intermittent schedule, resulting in partial regressions and significant inhibition of the growth of several colon adenocarcinoma lines. In rhabdomyosarcoma Rh12 and VRC5 colon adenocarcinoma, both of which demonstrated intermediate sensitivity to topotecan, and in osteosarcoma OS33, protracted p.o. administration for 13-20 weeks (1.0-1.5 mg/kg per dose given daily x 5 days) caused complete regression without regrowth in Rh12 and OS33 tumors and partial regression of all VRC5 tumors. No toxicity was observed using this schedule of administration. Topotecan demonstrated significant activity against all three osteosarcoma xenografts examined, with optimal schedules causing complete regression in two lines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1464161     DOI: 10.1007/bf00685553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  28 in total

1.  DNA topoisomerase I--targeted chemotherapy of human colon cancer in xenografts.

Authors:  B C Giovanella; J S Stehlin; M E Wall; M C Wani; A W Nicholas; L F Liu; R Silber; M Potmesil
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Prolonged administration of oral etoposide in patients with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

Authors:  D H Johnson; F A Greco; J Strupp; K R Hande; J D Hainsworth
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of the new antitumour drug SK&F 104864-A (NSC 609699) in plasma.

Authors:  J H Beijnen; B R Smith; W J Keijer; R van Gijn; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; L T Vlasveld; S Rodenhuis; W J Underberg
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  Growth and characterization of childhood rhabdomyosarcomas as xenografts.

Authors:  J A Houghton; P J Houghton; B L Webber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Preliminary pharmacologic and clinical evaluation of camptothecin sodium (NSC-100880).

Authors:  J A Gottlieb; A M Guarino; J B Call; V T Oliverio; J B Block
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1970-12

6.  Phase II testing of melphalan in children with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma: a model for anticancer drug development.

Authors:  M E Horowitz; E Etcubanas; M L Christensen; J A Houghton; S L George; A A Green; P J Houghton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  On the mechanism of cytotoxicity of fluorinated pyrimidines in four human colon adenocarcinoma xenografts maintained in immune-deprived mice.

Authors:  J A Houghton; P J Houghton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Development and characterization of pediatric osteosarcoma xenografts.

Authors:  W H Meyer; J A Houghton; P J Houghton; B L Webber; E C Douglass; A T Look
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  The S-phase cytotoxicity of camptothecin.

Authors:  G Del Bino; P Lassota; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  Melphalan: a potential new agent in the treatment of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  J A Houghton; R L Cook; P J Lutz; P J Houghton
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-01
View more
  48 in total

1.  Chemotherapy of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-02

2.  Evaluation of cytarabine against Ewing sarcoma xenografts by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; Min Kang; C Patrick Reynolds; Catherine A Billups; Edward Favours; Debbie Payne-Turner; Chandra Tucker; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 3.  Challenges and Opportunities for Childhood Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Raushan T Kurmasheva
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Oral Topotecan in Infants and Very Young Children with Brain Tumors Demonstrates a Role of ABCG2 rs4148157 on the Absorption Rate Constant.

Authors:  Jessica K Roberts; Anna V Birg; Tong Lin; Vinay M Daryani; John C Panetta; Alberto Broniscer; Giles W Robinson; Amar J Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  Phase II study of topotecan in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  G R Hudes; R Kosierowski; R Greenberg; H E Ramsey; S C Fox; R F Ozols; C A McAleer; B J Giantonio
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; J Verweij; J H Schellens; H Rosing; B E Davies; M de Boer-Dennert; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Initial testing of topotecan by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Hernan Carol; Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; John M Maris; Stephen T Keir; Amy Watkins; Malcolm A Smith; Richard B Lock
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Intratumoral infusion of topotecan prolongs survival in the nude rat intracranial U87 human glioma model.

Authors:  J Pollina; R J Plunkett; M J Ciesielski; A Lis; T A Barone; S J Greenberg; R A Fenstermaker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Activity of 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin against pediatric and adult central nervous system tumor xenografts.

Authors:  H S Friedman; P J Houghton; S C Schold; S Keir; D D Bigner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Efficacy of topotecan plus vincristine and doxorubicin in children with recurrent/refractory rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  C Meazza; M Casanova; E Zaffignani; R Luksch; M Podda; F Favini; S Catania; V Biassoni; C Morosi; A Ferrari
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.