Literature DB >> 23001504

Can the alpha angle assessment of cam impingement predict acetabular cartilage delamination?

Paul E Beaulé1, Kelly Hynes, Gillian Parker, Kyle A Kemp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substantial acetabular cartilage damage is commonly present in patients suffering from femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). A better understanding of which patient is at risk of developing substantial cartilage damage is critical for establishing appropriate treatment guidelines. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Does the cam deformity severity in FAI as assessed by alpha angle predict acetabular cartilage delamination? And (2) what are the clinical and radiographic findings in patients with acetabular cartilage delamination?
METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven patients (129 males, 38 females) with a mean age of 38 years (range, 17-59 years) underwent joint preservation surgery for cam-type FAI. All data were collected prospectively. We assessed center-edge angle and Tönnis grade on AP radiographs and alpha angle on specialized lateral radiographs. Acetabular cartilage damage was assessed intraoperatively using the classification of Beck et al., with Type 3 and greater qualifying as delamination.
RESULTS: For all hips, mean alpha angle was 65.5° (range, 41°-90°), and mean center-edge angle was 33.3° (range, 21°-52.5°). Patients with an alpha angle of 65° or greater had an odds ratio (OR) of 4.00 (95% CI, 1.26-12.71) of having Type 3 or greater damage. Increased age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07) and male sex (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.09-4.62) were associated with Type 3 or greater damage, while this was the opposite for acetabular coverage as assessed by center-edge angle (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cam-type FAI and an alpha angle of 65° or more are at increased risk of substantial cartilage damage while increasing acetabular coverage appears to have a protective effect. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001504      PMCID: PMC3492595          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2601-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  27 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Hip arthroscopy: an emerging gold standard.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz; Gary G Poehling
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity.

Authors:  Dominik C Meyer; Martin Beck; Tom Ellis; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Yet more evidence that osteoarthritis is not a cartilage disease.

Authors:  K D Brandt; E L Radin; P A Dieppe; L van de Putte
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Quality of life following femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Michel J Le Duff; Edward Zaragoza
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; F Ferner; P C Noble; R F Santore; S Werlen; T C Mamisch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Edward Zaragoza; Kambiz Motamedi; Nathan Copelan; Frederick J Dorey
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement.

Authors:  H P Nötzli; T F Wyss; C H Stoecklin; M R Schmid; K Treiber; J Hodler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-05

9.  Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; B J Thomas; R Jinnah; W Kim; T Grogan; C Yale
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Javad Parvizi; Vincent Boutier; Daniel Wyss; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  39 in total

1.  Morphologic and angular planning for cam resection in femoro-acetabular impingement: value of the omega angle.

Authors:  Paulo Renato Amaral Rego; Vasco Mascarenhas; Filipe S Oliveira; Pedro C Pinto; Augusto Gaspar; Joana Ovídio; Diego G Collado
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Gennaro Fiorentino; Alberto Fontanarosa; Riccardo Cepparulo; Alberto Guardoli; Luca Berni; Gianluca Coviello; Aldo Guardoli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

3.  Does Cartilage Degenerate in Asymptomatic Hips With Cam Morphology?

Authors:  George Grammatopoulos; Gerd Melkus; Kawan Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Femoro-acetabular impingement clinical research: is a composite outcome the answer?

Authors:  Olufemi R Ayeni; Mikael Sansone; Darren de Sa; Nicole Simunovic; Asheesh Bedi; Bryan T Kelly; Forough Farrokhyar; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  CORR Insights(®): The 2015 Frank Stinchfield Award: Radiographic Abnormalities Common in Senior Athletes With Well-functioning Hips but Not Associated With Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Stephanie Y Pun
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Femoro-acetabular impingement: anatomic study of reliability and accuracy of alpha angle and offset ratio on fifty consecutive peri-operatively resected femoral heads.

Authors:  Štěpán Magersky; Adam Král; Radovan Kubeš
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Poor Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography to Detect Hip Chondral Delamination: A Retrospective Follow-Up of 227 FAI-Operated Patients.

Authors:  George Konstantinidis; Michael Mitchell; Gordon Boyd; Catherine Coady; Swagata Ghosh; Ivan Wong
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The myths of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  New perspectives on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Moin Khan; Asheesh Bedi; Freddie Fu; Jon Karlsson; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Increased Hip Stresses Resulting From a Cam Deformity and Decreased Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle During Level Walking.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Giulia Mantovani; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.