Literature DB >> 23001245

Revisiting the time course of inter-trial feature priming in singleton search.

David R Thomson1, Bruce Milliken.   

Abstract

Current theories of the locus of inter-trial priming effects in efficient visual search posit an early perceptual component that reflects the short-term influence of a memory trace for low-level stimulus attributes. Despite the fact that this memory trace is hypothesized to be short term, and should therefore have a diminishing influence on performance over time, there has been relatively little study of the effect of time alone on singleton priming effects. The present series of experiments addresses this issue by systematically examining the effect of time on the priming of pop-out (PoP) effect. In Experiment 1, we show that the PoP effect does indeed diminish with increases in the RSI between trials, and does so in accord with a power-law function. In Experiment 2, we show that temporal discriminability of trial n - 1 from the trial that precedes it does not contribute to PoP effects. The results of Experiment 3 revealed two key results: (1) the PoP effect survives an equivalent number of intervening trials across very different RSI conditions; and (2) the cumulative target repetition benefit does depend on the RSI between trials. Together, the results favor neither a simple passive decay nor a strong episodic retrieval account of the PoP effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001245     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0455-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  24 in total

1.  Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Alex O Holcombe; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

2.  Perceptual distinctiveness produces long-lasting priming of pop-out.

Authors:  David R Thomson; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

3.  Contextual distinctiveness produces long-lasting priming of pop-out.

Authors:  David R Thomson; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Gianluca Campana
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A dual-stage account of inter-trial priming effects.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Amit Yashar; Lital Ruderman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Object- and feature-based priming in visual search.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Arný Ingvarsdóttir; Unnur Diljá Teitsdóttir
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

9.  The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Alon Zivony; Amit Yashar
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  A temporal ratio model of memory.

Authors:  Gordon D A Brown; Ian Neath; Nick Chater
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  The long and the short of priming in visual search.

Authors:  Wouter Kruijne; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Implicit learning modulates attention capture: evidence from an item-specific proportion congruency manipulation.

Authors:  David R Thomson; Karen Willoughby; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-04

3.  Implicit short- and long-term memory direct our gaze in visual search.

Authors:  Wouter Kruijne; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.