Literature DB >> 21784093

The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming.

Dominique Lamy1, Alon Zivony, Amit Yashar.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that intertrial repetition of target and distractors task-relevant properties speeds visual search performance, an effect known as priming of pop-out (PoP). Recent accounts suggest that such priming results, at least in part, from a mechanism that speeds post-selectional, response-related processes, the marker of which is an interaction between repetition of the target and distractor features and repetition of the response from the previous trial. However, this response-based component of inter-trial priming has been elusive, and it remains unclear what its boundary conditions might be. In addition, what information is represented in the episodic memory traces that underlie the response-based component has not yet been characterized. Here, we show that the response-based component of feature priming reflects an episodic memory retrieval mechanism that is not mandatory or automatic but may be described as a heuristic that subjects sometimes use, in particular when the overall difficulty of the search task is high. In addition, we show that the conjunction of the target and distractor features forms the context that is reactivated during episodic retrieval. Finally, we show that target-distractor discriminability is an important modulator of the selection-based component. The findings are discussed within the framework of the dual-stage model of inter-trial priming (Lamy, Yashar, & Ruderman, 2010).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21784093     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Perceptual distinctiveness produces long-lasting priming of pop-out.

Authors:  David R Thomson; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Feature-based attention: it is all bottom-up priming.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Revisiting the time course of inter-trial feature priming in singleton search.

Authors:  David R Thomson; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-09-22

Review 4.  Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Aniruddha Ramgir; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

5.  Element-level features in conjoint episodes in dual-tasking.

Authors:  Lasse Pelzer; Christoph Naefgen; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-08-10

6.  The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: from passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Styrmir Saevarsson; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

7.  The long and the short of priming in visual search.

Authors:  Wouter Kruijne; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Color priming in pop-out search depends on the relative color of the target.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Christian Valuch; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-08

9.  Implicit short- and long-term memory direct our gaze in visual search.

Authors:  Wouter Kruijne; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search.

Authors:  Liana Amunts; Amit Yashar; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.