Literature DB >> 23001151

Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue.

Stefan Schultheis1, Joerg R Strub, Thomas A Gerds, Petra C Guess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors analyzed the effect of fatigue on the survival rate and fracture load of monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate posterior three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) in comparison to the metal-ceramic gold standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors divided 96 human premolars and molars into three equal groups. Lithium-disilicate ceramic (IPS-e.max-CAD) was milled with the CEREC-3-system in full-anatomic FDP dimensions (monolithic: M-LiCAD) or as framework (Bi-layer: BL-LiCAD) with subsequent hand-layer veneering. Metal-ceramic FDPs (MC) served as control. Single-load-to-failure tests were performed before and after mouth-motion fatigue.
RESULTS: No fracture failures occurred during fatigue. Median fracture loads in [N], before and after fatigue were, respectively, as follows: M-LiCAD, 1,298/1,900; BL-LiCAD, 817/699; MC, 1,966/1,818. M-LiCAD and MC FPDs revealed comparable fracture loads and were both significantly higher than BL-LiCAD. M-LiCAD and BL-LiCAD both failed from core/veneer bulk fracture within the connector area. MC failures were limited to ceramic veneer fractures exposing the metal core. Fatigue had no significant effect on any group.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated lithium-disilicate FPDs were shown to be fracture resistant with failure load results comparable to the metal-ceramic gold standard. Clinical investigations are needed to confirm these promising laboratory results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated lithium-disilicate FDPs appeared to be a reliable treatment alternative for the posterior load-bearing area, whereas FDPs in bi-layer configuration were susceptible to low load fracture failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001151     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0830-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  41 in total

1.  Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: a methodologic clinical study.

Authors:  Thomas R Morneburg; Peter A Pröschel
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions.

Authors:  F A Fontijn-Tekamp; A P Slagter; A Van Der Bilt; M A Van 'T Hof; D J Witter; W Kalk; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  ZrO2 three-unit fixed partial dentures: comparison of failure load before and after exposure to a mastication simulator.

Authors:  W Att; M Grigoriadou; J R Strub
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials.

Authors:  R DeLong; W H Douglas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Retrospective survival analysis of 261 lithium disilicate crowns in a private general practice.

Authors:  Marco Valenti; Alessandro Valenti
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.677

6.  Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.

Authors:  Daniel Wolf; Andreas Bindl; Patrick R Schmidlin; Heinz Lüthy; Werner H Mörmann
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Terence E Donovan
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic.

Authors:  Matthias Kern; Martin Sasse; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 9.  Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Al-Amleh; K Lyons; M Swain
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Fracture strength of all-ceramic lithium disilicate and porcelain-fused-to-metal bridges for molar replacement after dynamic loading.

Authors:  Somsak Chitmongkolsuk; Guido Heydecke; Christian Stappert; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent       Date:  2002-03
View more
  21 in total

1.  Three-unit CAD/CAM-generated lithium disilicate FDPs after a mean observation time of 46 months.

Authors:  Sven Reich; Lutz Endres; Claudia Weber; Klaus Wiedhahn; Peter Neumann; Oliver Schneider; Nicole Rafai; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of cavity design and material type on fracture resistance and failure pattern of molars restored by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing inlays/onlays.

Authors:  Roqaia Mohammad Alassar; Amira Mohammad Samy; Fatma Mahmoud Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-03-17

3.  Flexural strength and microstructure of two lithium disilicate glass ceramics for CAD/CAM restoration in the dental clinic.

Authors:  Suk-Ho Kang; Juhea Chang; Ho-Hyun Son
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-08-23

4.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of anterior two-unit cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Filip Keulemans; Akikazu Shinya; Lippo V J Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Cornelis J Kleverlaan; Albert J Feilzer; Roeland J G De Moor
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-03-24

Review 5.  "Digitally Oriented Materials": Focus on Lithium Disilicate Ceramics.

Authors:  Fernando Zarone; Marco Ferrari; Francesco Guido Mangano; Renato Leone; Roberto Sorrentino
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-08-18

6.  Load-bearing capacity of various CAD/CAM monolithic molar crowns under recommended occlusal thickness and reduced occlusal thickness conditions.

Authors:  Sulki Choi; Hyung-In Yoon; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Fracture load and survival of anatomically representative monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with reduced tooth preparation and ceramic thickness.

Authors:  Noor A Nawafleh; Muhanad M Hatamleh; Andreas Öchsner; Florian Mack
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Effect of Different Luting Agents on the Retention of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns.

Authors:  Nicola Mobilio; Alberto Fasiol; Francesco Mollica; Santo Catapano
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  In vitro study of the fracture resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia for three-unit fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Jae-Won Choi; So-Yeun Kim; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Eun-Bin Bae; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Endocrown with Leucite-Reinforced Ceramic: Case of Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Authors:  Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha; José Mondelli; Caroline Moreira Auersvald; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli; Gisele Maria Correr; Adilson Yoshio Furuse
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2015-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.