Literature DB >> 18318617

Highlight disparity contributes to the authenticity and strength of perceived glossiness.

Gunnar Wendt1, Franz Faul, Rainer Mausfeld.   

Abstract

The disparity of highlights on specular reflecting surfaces usually differs from the disparity of the surface points. A. Kirschmann (1895) proposed that this fact may be used as a binocular cue for gloss perception. This was confirmed by A. Blake and H. Bülthoff (1990) who found that subjects judged the glossiness of convex ellipsoidal surfaces as most realistic if the disparity of the highlights was close to the physical correct one. Extending on this finding, we investigate more closely whether the effect of highlight disparity depends on the sharpness of the highlight and the relative amount of diffuse and specular reflection. We measured the effect of highlight disparity on both perceived strength and perceived authenticity of gloss. We used complex, three-dimensional curved surfaces that were stereoscopically presented on a CRT. The reflection characteristics were varied using the Phong lighting model. Highlights were presented either with or without highlight disparity. In a rating experiment, subjects were asked to judge the strength and the authenticity of the perceived surface glossiness. The presence of highlight disparity lead to an enhancement of both the authenticity and the strength of perceived glossiness. The latter finding was confirmed in an additional matching experiment.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318617     DOI: 10.1167/8.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  12 in total

1.  Key characteristics of specular stereo.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The dark side of gloss.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Phillip J Marlow; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Perceived glossiness and lightness under real-world illumination.

Authors:  Maria Olkkonen; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  'Proto-rivalry': how the binocular brain identifies gloss.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Differential processing of binocular and monocular gloss cues in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; Massimiliano Di Luca; Hiroshi Ban; Alexander Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Motion of glossy objects does not promote separation of lighting and surface colour.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Enhancement of glossiness perception by retinal-image motion: additional effect of head-yoked motion parallax.

Authors:  Yusuke Tani; Keisuke Araki; Takehiro Nagai; Kowa Koida; Shigeki Nakauchi; Michiteru Kitazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  fMRI evidence for areas that process surface gloss in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; Hiroshi Ban; Massimiliano Di Luca; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Effects of specular highlights on perceived surface convexity.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; James H Elder
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Lustrous material appearances: Internal and external constraints on triggering conditions for binocular lustre.

Authors:  Rainer Mausfeld; Gunnar Wendt; Jürgen Golz
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.