Literature DB >> 10052585

Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions.

J E Bos1, W Bles.   

Abstract

In an attempt to predict the amount of motion sickness given any kind of motion stimulus, we describe a model using explicit knowledge of the vestibular system. First, the generally accepted conflict theory is restated in terms of a conflict between a vertical as perceived by the sense organs like the vestibular system and the subjective vertical as determined on the basis of previous experience. Second, this concept is integrated with optimal estimation theory by the use of an internal model. If detailed for vertical motions only, the model does predict typical observed motion sickness characteristics, irrespective the parameter setting. By adjusting the nonvestibular parameters, the model can also quantitatively be adapted to seasickness data from the literature. With this concept, sickness severity hypothetically can also be predicted for other motions, irrespective of their origin and complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10052585     DOI: 10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00088-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  25 in total

1.  Motion sickness induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR).

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Sofronis Sofroniou; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Space motion sickness.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul Dizio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vestibular functions in motion sickness susceptible individuals.

Authors:  Fuat Buyuklu; Erkan Tarhan; Levent Ozluoglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Perceptual scaling of visual and inertial cues: effects of field of view, image size, depth cues, and degree of freedom.

Authors:  B J Correia Grácio; J E Bos; M M van Paassen; M Mulder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Inter-hemispheric desynchronization of the human MT+ during visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Jungo Miyazaki; Hiroki Yamamoto; Yoshikatsu Ichimura; Hiroyuki Yamashiro; Tomokazu Murase; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Masahiro Umeda; Toshihiro Higuchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of motion sickness severity on the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Cynthia G Fowler; Amanda Sweet; Emily Steffel
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Sarah M Harmon
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 9.  Brainstem processing of vestibular sensory exafference: implications for motion sickness etiology.

Authors:  Charles M Oman; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Motion sickness diagnostic criteria: Consensus Document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha; John F Golding; Behrang Keshavarz; Joseph Furman; Ji-Soo Kim; Jose A Lopez-Escamez; Måns Magnusson; Bill J Yates; Ben D Lawson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.